scholarly journals A Service evaluation of a hospital child death review process to elucidate understanding of contributory factors to child mortality and inform practice in the English National Health Service

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e015802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S Magnus ◽  
Margrid B Schindler ◽  
Robin D Marlow ◽  
James I Fraser

ObjectiveTo describe a novel approach to hospital mortality meetings to elucidate understanding of contributory factors to child death and inform practice in the National Health Service.DesignAll child deaths were separately reviewed at a meeting attended by professionals across the healthcare pathway, and an assessment was made of contributory factors to death across domains intrinsic to the child, family and environment, parenting capacity and service delivery. Data were analysed from a centrally held database of records.SettingAll child deaths in a tertiary children’s hospital between 1 April 2010 and 1 April 2013.Main outcome measuresDescriptive data summarising contributory factors to child deaths.Results95 deaths were reviewed. In 85% cases, factors intrinsic to the child provided complete explanation for death. In 11% cases, factors in the family and environment and, in 5% cases, factors in parenting capacity, contributed to patient vulnerability. In 33% cases, factors in service provision contributed to patient vulnerability and in two patients provided complete explanation for death. 26% deaths were classified as potentially preventable and in those cases factors in service provision were more commonly identified than factors across other domains (OR: 4.89; 95% CI 1.26 to 18.9).ConclusionsHospital child death review meetings attended by professionals involved in patient management across the healthcare pathway inform understanding of events leading to a child’s death. Using a bioecological approach to scrutinise contributory factors the multidisciplinary team concluded most deaths occurred as a consequence of underlying illness. Although factors relating to service provision were commonly identified, they rarely provided a complete explanation for death. Efforts to reduce child mortality should be driven by an understanding of modifiable risk factors. Systematic data collection arising from a standardised approach to hospital reviews should be the basis for national mortality review processes and database development.

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 244-250
Author(s):  
James Fraser ◽  
Vicky Sleap ◽  
Peter Sidebotham

In October 2018, National Health Service England published new operational guidance for reviewing child deaths, which covers all children who die less than 18 years of age regardless of the cause of death. The Guidance is for all healthcare professionals caring for children as well as senior leaders who commission, provide or regulate children’s services. It does not aim to be prescriptive but instead sets out a framework of expectations that intends to be flexible and proportionate. Its essential building blocks will be familiar to practising paediatricians: notification, investigation, review and reporting. It should be regarded as a key pillar in the hospital’s governance program.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth Stephens ◽  
Seth O'Neill ◽  
Chris Clifford ◽  
Andrew Cuff ◽  
Felipe Forte ◽  
...  

Seizure ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon M. Dickson ◽  
Peter A. Scott ◽  
Markus Reuber

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Laurence M.A. Shaw ◽  
Adam Balen ◽  
Elizabeth Lenton ◽  
Clare Brown ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e041275
Author(s):  
Kathrin Cresswell ◽  
Aziz Sheikh ◽  
Bryony Dean Franklin ◽  
Marta Krasuska ◽  
Hung Nguyen ◽  
...  

IntroductionMany countries are launching large-scale, digitally enabled change programmes as part of efforts to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of care. We have been commissioned to conduct an independent evaluation of a major national change programme, the Global Digital Exemplar (GDE) Programme, which aims to develop exemplary digital health solutions and encourage their wider adoption by creating a learning ecosystem across English National Health Service (NHS) provider organisations.Methods and analysisThis theoretically informed, qualitative, longitudinal formative evaluation comprises five inter-related work packages. We will conduct a combination of 12 in-depth and 24 broader qualitative case studies in GDE sites exploring digital transformation, local learning and mechanisms of spread of knowledge within the Programme and across the wider NHS. Data will be collected through a combination of semistructured interviews with managers, implementation staff (clinical and non-clinical), vendors and policymakers, plus non-participant observations of meetings, site visits, workshops and documentary analysis of strategic local and national plans. Data will be analysed through inductive and deductive methods, beginning with in-depth case study sites and testing the findings against data from the wider sample and national stakeholders.Ethics and disseminationThis work is commissioned as part of a national change programme and is therefore a service evaluation. We have ethical approval from the University of Edinburgh. Results will be disseminated at six monthly intervals to national policymakers, and made available via our publicly accessible website. We will also identify lessons for the management and evaluation of large-scale evolving digital health change programmes that are of international relevance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document