scholarly journals Prevalence of antimicrobial use and active healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals: a multicentre prevalence survey in Japan

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e027604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junpei Komagamine ◽  
Taku Yabuki ◽  
Masaki Kobayashi ◽  
Taro Okabe
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Drugs ◽  
Infection Treatment ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Healthcare Associated

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of antimicrobial drug use and active healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and to evaluate the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in acute care hospitals in Japan.DesignA prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.ParticipantsAll hospitalised patients on a survey day.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving any antimicrobial agents. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with active HAIs. The reasons for antimicrobial drug use and appropriateness of antibiotic therapy were also investigated.ResultsEight hundred twenty eligible patients were identified. The median patient age was 70 years (IQR 55–80); 380 (46.3%) were women, 150 (18.3%) had diabetes mellitus and 107 (13.1%) were immunosuppressive medication users. The proportion of patients receiving any antimicrobial drugs was 33.5% (95% CI 30.3% to 36.8%). The proportion of patients with active HAIs was 7.4% (95% CI 5.6% to 9.2%). A total of 327 antimicrobial drugs were used at the time of the survey. Of those, 163 (49.8%), 101 (30.9%) and 46 (14.1%) were used for infection treatment, surgical prophylaxis and medical prophylaxis, respectively. The most commonly used antimicrobial drugs for treatment were ceftriaxone (n=25, 15.3%), followed by piperacillin–tazobactam (n=22, 13.5%) and cefmetazole (n=13, 8.0%). In the 163 antimicrobial drugs used for infection treatment, 62 (38.0%) were judged to be inappropriately used.ConclusionsThe prevalence of antimicrobial use and active HAIs and the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in Japan were similar to those of other developed countries. A strategy to improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy provided to hospitalised patients is needed.Trial registration numberUMIN000033568

scholarly journals A trend in prevalence of antimicrobial use and appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in an acute care hospital from 2018 to 2019: repeated prevalence surveys in Japan

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junpei Komagamine ◽  
Taku Yabuki ◽  
Taku Hiraiwa
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Drug ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Drugs ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Appropriate Antimicrobial Use

Abstract Objectives The supply of cefazolin has been reduced dramatically since March 2019 in Japan. However, no studies have evaluated the effects of cefazolin shortage on the appropriateness of antimicrobial use. Therefore, we compared the appropriateness of inpatient antimicrobial drug use between the two surveys conducted in August 2018 and August 2019 in a Japanese hospital with no supply of cefazolin since the cefazolin shortage. Results In the 2019 survey, a total of 275 patients were included, and 256 patients were included in the 2018 survey. The prevalence of antimicrobial drug use did not change from 2018 to 2019 (28.5% versus 28.7%; p = 0.96). The proportion of cefazolin in all antimicrobial drugs used on the survey date significantly decreased from 2018 to 2019 (24.1% versus 0.0%; p < 0.001). The proportion of appropriate antimicrobial use in all antimicrobial therapies tended to be lower in 2019 than in 2018 (41.2% versus 60.6%; p = 0.06), and the proportion of unnecessary use of a broader spectrum of antimicrobial drugs significantly increased from 2018 to 2019 (4.7% versus 37.3%; p = 0.002). The shortage of cefazolin might lead to inappropriate use of other antimicrobial drugs.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial use in acute care hospitals: national point prevalence survey on healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use, Switzerland, 2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (33) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Zingg ◽  
Aliki Metsini ◽  
Céline Gardiol ◽  
Carlo Balmelli ◽  
Michael Behnke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey ◽  
Broad Spectrum Antibiotics ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Background A point prevalence survey (PPS) on healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antimicrobial use was conducted in Swiss acute care hospitals in 2017. Aim Our objective was to assess antimicrobial use in Swiss acute care hospitals. Methods All patients hospitalised in any acute care hospital in Switzerland were eligible. We used the most recent version of the PPS protocol of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Results Data from 12,931 patients of 96 hospitals were collected. Of these, 4,265 (33%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 32.2–33.8) were on 5,354 antimicrobials for 4,487 indications. Most of the 2,808 therapeutic indications addressed 1,886 community-acquired infections (67.2%; 95% CI: 65.4–68.9). Of the 1,176 surgical prophylaxes, 350 (29.8%; 95% CI: 27.1–32.4) exceeded the duration of 1 day. Of the 1,090 antimicrobial regimens that were changed, 309 (28.3%; 95% CI: 25.7–31.0) were escalated and 337 (30.9%; 95% CI: 28.2–33.7) were de-escalated. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most frequent antimicrobial (18.8%; 95% CI: 17.7–19.8), prescribed mainly for therapeutic indications (76.0%; 95% CI: 73.3–78.7). A total of 1,931 (37.4%; 95% CI: 36.1–38.8) of the 5,158 antimicrobials for systemic use were broad-spectrum antibiotics, most frequently third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (35.9%; 95% CI: 33.8–38.1). Conclusions Antimicrobial consumption was at European average, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the lower third. Swiss acute care hospitals should invest in antimicrobial stewardship, particularly in reducing the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals: results from the second point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use, 2016 to 2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (46) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diamantis Plachouras ◽  
Tommi Kärki ◽  
Sonja Hansen ◽  
Susan Hopkins ◽  
Outi Lyytikäinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Surgical Prophylaxis ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Antimicrobial agents used to treat infections are life-saving. Overuse may result in more frequent adverse effects and emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms. In 2016–17, we performed the second point-prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals. We included 1,209 hospitals and 310,755 patients in 28 of 31 European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries. The weighted prevalence of antimicrobial use in the EU/EEA was 30.5% (95% CI: 29.2–31.9%). The most common indication for prescribing antimicrobials was treatment of a community-acquired infection, followed by treatment of HAI and surgical prophylaxis. Over half (54.2%) of antimicrobials for surgical prophylaxis were prescribed for more than 1 day. The most common infections treated by antimicrobials were respiratory tract infections and the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents were penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors. There was wide variation of patients on antimicrobials, in the selection of antimicrobial agents and in antimicrobial stewardship resources and activities across the participating countries. The results of the PPS provide detailed information on antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals, enable comparisons between countries and hospitals, and highlight key areas for national and European action that will support efforts towards prudent use of antimicrobials.

scholarly journals A nationwide assessment of the burden of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use among surgical patients: results from Serbian point prevalence survey, 2017

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Šuljagić ◽  
Milica Bajčetić ◽  
Vesna Mioljević ◽  
Gorana Dragovac ◽  
Biljana Mijović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Extrinsic Factors ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background As the only non-European Union (EU) country, Serbia participated in a second point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use (AMU) organized by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) in the EU countries. Here, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of HAI and AMU in patients who had recently undergone a surgery and to compare risk profile, HAI rates, and AMU among surgical patients and non-surgical patients. Methods A national PPS was performed in 65 Serbian acute-care hospitals, in November 2017. In this paper, the data of 61 hospitals for adult acute-care were analyzed. To ensure the comparability of study design we used the Serbian translation of ECDC case definitions and ECDC PPS protocol. The trained infection control staff, led by a hospital coordinator, reviewed medical records to identify HAI active at the time of the survey and AMU. Only inpatients admitted to the ward before 8 a.m. on the day if the survey were included. Results A total of 12,478 patients from 61 hospitals for adult acute-care were eligible for inclusion in this study. Significantly higher proportions of surgical patients were female, belonged to the 60-to-79 age group, and were less severely ill. Also, extrinsic factors (invasive devices, hospitalization at the ICU, and prior antibiotics therapy) were more frequent in surgical patients. Prevalence of HAIs was higher among surgical patients (261/3626; 7.2%) than among non-surgical patients (258/8852; 2.9%) (p < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of all HAIs was noted in patients who had kidney transplantation (4/11; 36.4%), while SSIs were the most prevalent among patients who had peripheral vascular bypass surgery (3/15; 20.0%). Non-surgical patients received treatment for community-acquired infections in significantly higher proportion (2664/8852; 64.3) (p < 0.001). Surgical prophylaxis for more than 1 day was applied in 71.4% of surgical patients. Conclusion We have provided an insight into the burden of HAIs and AMU among Serbia acute-care hospitals, and highlighted several priority areas and targets for quality improvement.

scholarly journals Pathogens Associated With Repeat Versus Single Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections, Acute-Care Hospitals, NHSN

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s343-s344
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
National Level ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Healthcare Associated Infections ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Repeat Infection ◽  
Single Versus

Background: The NHSN is the nation’s largest surveillance system for healthcare-associated infections. Since 2011, acute-care hospitals (ACHs) have been required to report intensive care unit (ICU) central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) to the NHSN pursuant to CMS requirements. In 2015, this requirement included general medical, surgical, and medical-surgical wards. Also in 2015, the NHSN implemented a repeat infection timeframe (RIT) that required repeat CLABSIs, in the same patient and admission, to be excluded if onset was within 14 days. This analysis is the first at the national level to describe repeat CLABSIs. Methods: Index CLABSIs reported in ACH ICUs and select wards during 2015–2108 were included, in addition to repeat CLABSIs occurring at any location during the same period. CLABSIs were stratified into 2 groups: single and repeat CLABSIs. The repeat CLABSI group included the index CLABSI and subsequent CLABSI(s) reported for the same patient. Up to 5 CLABSIs were included for a single patient. Pathogen analyses were limited to the first pathogen reported for each CLABSI, which is considered to be the most important cause of the event. Likelihood ratio χ2 tests were used to determine differences in proportions. Results: Of the 70,214 CLABSIs reported, 5,983 (8.5%) were repeat CLABSIs. Of 3,264 nonindex CLABSIs, 425 (13%) were identified in non-ICU or non-select ward locations. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in both the single and repeat CLABSI groups (14.2% and 12%, respectively) (Fig. 1). Compared to all other pathogens, CLABSIs reported with Candida spp were less likely in a repeat CLABSI event than in a single CLABSI event (P < .0001). Insertion-related organisms were more likely to be associated with single CLABSIs than repeat CLABSIs (P < .0001) (Fig. 2). Alternatively, Enterococcus spp or Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca were more likely to be associated with repeat CLABSIs than single CLABSIs (P < .0001). Conclusions: This analysis highlights differences in the aggregate pathogen distributions comparing single versus repeat CLABSIs. Assessing the pathogens associated with repeat CLABSIs may offer another way to assess the success of CLABSI prevention efforts (eg, clean insertion practices). Pathogens such as Enterococcus spp and Klebsiella spp demonstrate a greater association with repeat CLABSIs. Thus, instituting prevention efforts focused on these organisms may warrant greater attention and could impact the likelihood of repeat CLABSIs. Additional analysis of patient-specific pathogens identified in the repeat CLABSI group may yield further clarification.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document