scholarly journals Cost of maternal health services in low and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e027822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ◽  
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde ◽  
Oluwasola Banke-Thomas ◽  
Adamu Maikano ◽  
Charles Anawo Ameh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Service ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Health Service Provision ◽  
Middle Income Countries

IntroductionThere is substantial evidence that maternal health services across the continuum of care are effective in reducing morbidities and mortalities associated with pregnancy and childbirth. There is also consensus regarding the need to invest in the delivery of these services towards the global goal of achieving Universal Health Coverage in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited evidence on the costs of providing these services. This protocol describes the methods and analytical framework to be used in conducting a systematic review of costs of providing maternal health services in LMICs.MethodsAfrican Journal Online, CINAHL Plus, EconLit, Embase, Global Health Archive, Popline, PubMed and Scopus as well as grey literature databases will be searched for relevant articles which report primary cost data for maternal health service in LMICs published from January 2000 to June 2019. This search will be conducted without implementing any language restrictions. Two reviewers will independently search, screen and select articles that meet the inclusion criteria, with disagreements resolved by discussions with a third reviewer. Quality assessment of included articles will be conducted based on cost-focused criteria included in globally recommended checklists for economic evaluations. For comparability, where feasible, cost will be converted to international dollar equivalents using purchasing power parity conversion factors. Costs associated with providing each maternal health services will be systematically compared, using a subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis will also be conducted. Where heterogeneity is observed, a narrative synthesis will be used. Population contextual and intervention design characteristics that help achieve cost savings and improve efficiency of maternal health service provision in LMICs will be identified.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this review. The plan for dissemination is to publish review findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present findings at high-level conferences that engage the most pertinent stakeholders.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018114124

scholarly journals Cost of Utilising Maternal Health Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas ◽  
Francis Ifeanyi Ayomoh ◽  
Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde ◽  
Oluwasola Banke-Thomas ◽  
Ejemai Amaize Eboreime ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Service ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Cost Drivers ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: Cost is a major barrier to maternal health service utilisation for many women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, comparable evidence of the available cost data in these countries is limited. We conducted a systematic review and comparative analysis of costs of utilising maternal health services in these settings. Methods: We searched peer-reviewed and grey literature databases for articles reporting cost of utilising maternal health services in LMICs published post-2000. All retrieved records were screened and articles meeting the inclusion criteria selected. Quality assessment was performed using the relevant cost-specific criteria of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. To guarantee comparability, disaggregated costs data were inflated to 2019 US dollar equivalents. Total adjusted costs and cost drivers associated with utilising each service were systematically compared. Where heterogeneity in methods or non-disaggregated costs was observed, narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. Results: Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. Many of the studies costed multiple services. However, the most frequently costed services were utilisation of normal vaginal delivery (22 studies), caesarean delivery (13), and antenatal care (ANC) (10). The least costed services were post-natal care (PNC) and post-abortion care (PAC) (5 each). Studies used varied methods for data collection and analysis and their quality ranged from low to high with most assessed as average or high. Generally, across all included studies, cost of utilisation progressively increased from ANC and PNC to delivery and PAC, and from public to private providers. Medicines and diagnostics were main cost drivers for ANC and PNC while cost drivers were variable for delivery. Women experienced financial burden of utilising maternal health services and also had to pay some unofficial costs to access care, even where formal exemptions existed. Conclusion: Consensus regarding approach for costing maternal health services will help to improve their relevance for supporting policy-making towards achieving universal health coverage. If indeed the post-2015 mission of the global community is to "leave no one behind," then we need to ensure that women and their families are not facing unnecessary and unaffordable costs that could potentially tip them into poverty.

scholarly journals Maternal health services utilization among mothers in a rural municipality

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-131
Author(s):  
Nirmala Ghimire ◽  
Roshani Agrawal Khatry ◽  
Vivechana Shakya
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Health ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Service Utilization ◽  
Health Service Utilization ◽  
Maternal Health Services ◽  
Maternal Health Service ◽  
Rural Municipality ◽  
Good Utilization ◽  
The Government

Introduction: Maternal health is essential to ensure the good health of the mother as well as children and by extension, the whole family. Despite the various measures launched by the government to enhance maternal care services, the utilization remains at large. Method: A community-based face to face interview was conducted using a pre-tested structured survey questionnaire to find out maternal health service utilization among mothers in Mahankal Rural Municipality, Lalitpur, Nepal, during Feb-Jun 2020. A probability simple random sampling was used to select mothers having children aged between 1 to 3 y. A score of  ≥mean was considered good utilization and below it a poor utilization. The study was approved by the ethical committee. The SPSS 16 was used for descriptive (frequency, mean) and comparative analysis by chi square between demographics and health service utilization. Result: There were a total of 178 mothers surveyed, the mean age of 25.9±4.4 y, 77(43.3%) had completed elementary school, and 147(82.6%) were farmers. Good utilization of maternal health service 98(55%) and poor utilization 80(45%). The majority 153(86%) had ≥4 Antenatal checkups, 55(30.9%) had delivered at home despite the government incentive for institutional delivery, 105(59%) had postnatal visits ≥1, and 18(10%) had 3 postnatal visits.   Conclusion: The study revealed that slightly more than half (55%) of mothers surveyed had good utilization of maternal health services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document