scholarly journals Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e029965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanie Sims Gould ◽  
Catherine Tong ◽  
Jessica Ly ◽  
Sara Vazirian ◽  
Adriaan Windt ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a group and team-based medical visit programme to lower haemoglobin A1c among patients with T2DM. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implement the GAP intervention within a primary care setting, with an emphasis on patient experience.Research design and methodsThis was a qualitative exploratory study. Data were gathered from semistructured interviews conducted with the first cohort of GAP study participants (n=15) at baseline and intervention completion. GAP participants were aged >65, diagnosed with T2DM and from one primary care clinic. The interview questions identified the patient perspectives and factors relating to their attendance at seven group medical visits that were part of the intervention programme. Data were analysed using framework analysis.ResultsWe identified four themes that captured participants’ experiences: (1) Education: learning with professionals, learning with one another; (2) Social Support: common interests, common problems; (3) Setting: ease of location, ease of conversation and (4) Impact: expectations met, empowerment gained. The GAP intervention increased participants’ self-reported diabetes literacy and self-management skills.ConclusionsWe learnt that: accessible community centres, not primary care offices, were the ideal location for GAP; the consistent leadership of the primary care physician was valued by participants; and, the content related to exercise and healthy diet were viewed as impactful. Also, learning was achieved through content delivered by clinical experts, and by T2DM experts with lived experience—the GAP peers. Our findings highlight the important role of group learning.Trial registration numberNCT02002143

1999 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
NATHAN A. RIDGEWAY ◽  
DONALD R. HARVILL ◽  
LEO M. HARVILL ◽  
THELMA M. FALIN ◽  
GAYLE M. FORESTER ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasliza Abu Hassan ◽  
Hizlinda Tohid ◽  
Rahmah Mohd Amin ◽  
Mohamed Badrulnizam Long Bidin ◽  
Leelavathi Muthupalaniappen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-444
Author(s):  
Ching Li Lee ◽  
◽  
Siew Swee Winnie Chee ◽  
Kanimolli Arasu ◽  
Siew Kim Kwa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hardesh Dhillon ◽  
Rusli Bin Nordin ◽  
Amutha Ramadas

Diabetes complications, medication adherence, and psychosocial well-being have been associated with quality of life (QOL) among several Western and Asian populations with diabetes, however, there is little evidence substantiating these relationships among Malaysia’s unique and diverse population. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a Malaysian public primary care clinic among 150 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Structured and validated questionnaires were used to investigate the associations between demographic, clinical, and psychological factors with QOL of the study participants. Approximately three-quarters of patients had a good-excellent QOL. Diabetes-related variables that were significantly associated with poor QOL scores included insulin containing treatment regimens, poor glycemic control, inactive lifestyle, retinopathy, neuropathy, abnormal psychosocial well-being, higher diabetes complication severity, and nonadherence (p < 0.05). The main predictors of a good-excellent QOL were HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (aOR = 20.78, 95% CI = 2.5175.9, p = 0.005), normal anxiety levels (aOR = 5.73, 95% CI = 1.8–18.5, p = 0.004), medication adherence (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.3–8.7, p = 0.012), and an aDCSI score of one and two as compared to those greater than or equal to four (aOR = 7.78, 95% CI = 1.5–39.2, p = 0.013 and aOR = 8.23, 95% CI = 2.1–32.8, p = 0.003), respectively. Medication adherence has also been found to be an effect modifier of relationships between HbA1c, depression, anxiety, disease severity, and QOL. These predictors of QOL are important factors to consider when managing patients with T2DM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document