scholarly journals Assessing the effectiveness of workplace accommodations in facilitating return to work after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e041581
Author(s):  
Reema Shafi ◽  
Angela Colantonio

IntroductionReturning to work and sustaining employment can be a significant challenge for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. Within the literature, there is recurring support for the role of workplace accommodations in effective and early return-to-work (RTW). To date, however, there has been a lack of systematic reviews exploring the specific role of workplace accommodations within the context of RTW after TBI. The primary objective of this protocol is to outline the methodological approach that will be undertaken to systematically review the literature and to assess the effectiveness of workplace accommodations in facilitating RTW.Methods and analysisA total of nine databases will be searched systematically using the concepts ‘Brain injury,’ ‘RTW’ and ‘Job Accommodations.’ Study selection will be performed independently by three reviewers, based on predetermined eligibility criteria through two rounds of screening using, first, the title and abstract, followed by a full-text search. Extracted information will include the study’s purpose, design, and setting; the data source and type; the severity of TBI and the diagnostic criterion used; a comprehensive description of the intervention provided; the RTW outcome variables and the statistical methods used, etc. The data will be tabulated and narratively synthesised. Systematic review registration: This protocol has been registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.Ethics and disseminationAs this review intends to use pre-existing published studies hence research ethics board approvals will not be required. Nevertheless, this review will follow the ethical and governance standards in the data management and presentation of results. The findings from this review will potentially be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (electronically and in print). The results of this review will be presented at both national/international conferences and shared with stakeholders influencing RTW practices.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016043517.

Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1018-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Lawrence ◽  
Paul Comper ◽  
Michael G. Hutchison ◽  
Bhanu Sharma

2020 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 105815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Loggini ◽  
Ruth Tangonan ◽  
Faten El Ammar ◽  
Ali Mansour ◽  
Fernando D. Goldenberg ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e035513
Author(s):  
Dawn Shu Hui Looi ◽  
Mark Sen Liang Goh ◽  
Sharon Si Min Goh ◽  
Jia Ling Goh ◽  
Rehena Sultana ◽  
...  

IntroductionChildren who suffer from traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at risk of permanent brain damage and developmental deficits. Reports on neurodevelopmental outcomes in paediatric TBI suffer from small sample size and varying outcome definitions in the neurocognitive domains tested. This protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis of paediatric TBI in the following key neurocognitive domains: executive function, perceptual–motor function, language, learning and memory, social cognition and complex attention.MethodsA comprehensive search comprising studies from Medline, Cochrane, Embase and PsycINFO published from 1988 to 2019 will be conducted. We will include studies on children ≤18 years old who suffer from mild, moderate and severe TBI as determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale that report neurocognitive outcomes in domains predetermined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition criteria. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, case–control, cohort and cross-sectional studies will be included. References from systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be hand-searched for relevant articles. A meta-analysis will be performed and effect sizes will be calculated to summarise the magnitude of change in each neurocognitive domain compared at different timepoints and stratified by severity of TBI. Included studies will be pooled using pooled standardised mean differences with a random effects model to determine an overall effect. In the scenario that we are unable to pool the studies, we will perform a narrative analysis.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study.The authors of this study will publish and present the findings in a peer-reviewed journal as well as national and international conferences. The results of this study will provide understanding into the association between different severities of paediatric TBI and long-term neurocognitive outcomes.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020152680.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn W. Graham ◽  
Michael D. West ◽  
Jessica L. Bourdon ◽  
Katherine J. Inge ◽  
Hannah E. Seward

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam M. Treggiari ◽  
Nicolas Schutz ◽  
N. David Yanez ◽  
Jacques-Andre Romand

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document