The role of occupational participation for people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the literature

Author(s):  
Ivana Klepo ◽  
Claire Sangster Jokić ◽  
Dubravko Tršinski
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angus Lindsay ◽  
Gregory Baxter-Parker ◽  
Steven P. Gieseg

We performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate pterins as biomarkers of mechanical and impact-induced trauma. MEDLINE and Scopus were searched in March 2019. We included in vivo human studies that measured a pterin in response to mechanical or impact-induced trauma with no underlying prior disease or complication. We included 40 studies with a total of 3829 subjects. Seventy-seven percent of studies measured a significant increase in a pterin, primarily neopterin or total neopterin (neopterin + 7,8-dihydroneopterin). Fifty-one percent of studies measured an increase within 24 h or trauma, while 46% measured increases beyond 48 h. Pterins also showed promise as predictors of post-trauma complications such as sepsis, multi-organ failure and mortality. Exercise-induced trauma and traumatic brain injury caused an immediate increase in neopterin or total neopterin, while patients of multiple trauma had elevated pterin levels that remained above baseline for several days. Pterin concentration changes in response to surgery were variable with patients undergoing cardiac surgery having immediate and sustained pterin increases, while hysterectomy, liver resection or hysterectomy showed no change. This review provides systematic evidence that pterins, in particular neopterin and total neopterin, increase in response to multiple forms of mechanical or impact-induced trauma.


Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1018-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Lawrence ◽  
Paul Comper ◽  
Michael G. Hutchison ◽  
Bhanu Sharma

2020 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 105815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Loggini ◽  
Ruth Tangonan ◽  
Faten El Ammar ◽  
Ali Mansour ◽  
Fernando D. Goldenberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110508
Author(s):  
Olivia A. Keane ◽  
Mauricio A. Escobar ◽  
Lucas P. Neff ◽  
Ian C. Mitchell ◽  
Joshua J. Chern ◽  
...  

Background Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects about 475,000 children in the United States annually. Studies from the 1990s showed worse mortality in pediatric TBI patients not transferred to a pediatric trauma center (PTC), but did not examine mild pediatric TBI. Evidence-based guidelines used to identify children with clinically insignificant TBI who do not require head CT were developed by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). However, which patients can be safely observed at a non-PTC is not directly addressed. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted, focusing on management of pediatric TBI and transfer decisions from 1990 to 2020. Results Pediatric TBI patients make up a great majority of preventable transfers and admissions, and comprise a significant portion of avoidable costs to the health care system. Majority of mild TBI patients admitted to a PTC following transfer do not require ICU care, surgical intervention, or additional imaging. Studies have shown that as high as 83% of mild pediatric TBI patients are discharged within 24 hrs. Conclusions An evidence-based clinical practice algorithm was derived through synthesis of the data reviewed to guide transfer decision. The papers discussed in our systematic review largely concluded that transfer and admission was unnecessary and costly in pediatric patients with mild TBI who met the following criteria: blunt, no concern for NAT, low risk on PECARN assessment, or intermediate risk on PECARN with negative imaging or imaging with either isolated, nondisplaced skull fractures without ICH and/or EDH, or SDH <0.3 cm with no midline shift.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e041581
Author(s):  
Reema Shafi ◽  
Angela Colantonio

IntroductionReturning to work and sustaining employment can be a significant challenge for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. Within the literature, there is recurring support for the role of workplace accommodations in effective and early return-to-work (RTW). To date, however, there has been a lack of systematic reviews exploring the specific role of workplace accommodations within the context of RTW after TBI. The primary objective of this protocol is to outline the methodological approach that will be undertaken to systematically review the literature and to assess the effectiveness of workplace accommodations in facilitating RTW.Methods and analysisA total of nine databases will be searched systematically using the concepts ‘Brain injury,’ ‘RTW’ and ‘Job Accommodations.’ Study selection will be performed independently by three reviewers, based on predetermined eligibility criteria through two rounds of screening using, first, the title and abstract, followed by a full-text search. Extracted information will include the study’s purpose, design, and setting; the data source and type; the severity of TBI and the diagnostic criterion used; a comprehensive description of the intervention provided; the RTW outcome variables and the statistical methods used, etc. The data will be tabulated and narratively synthesised. Systematic review registration: This protocol has been registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.Ethics and disseminationAs this review intends to use pre-existing published studies hence research ethics board approvals will not be required. Nevertheless, this review will follow the ethical and governance standards in the data management and presentation of results. The findings from this review will potentially be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (electronically and in print). The results of this review will be presented at both national/international conferences and shared with stakeholders influencing RTW practices.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016043517.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document