scholarly journals Advance care planning in Dutch primary care: a pre/post-implementation study

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002762
Author(s):  
Annicka van der Plas ◽  
Jolien Glaudemans ◽  
Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Clear Idea

BackgroundDespite known advantages of advance care planning (ACP) and a positive attitude towards ACP by older people living in the community and general practitioners (GPs), such conversations are not yet commonplace in GP practices.AimTo implement ACP as part of routine care in general practice and thereby increasing the number of ACP conversations and advance directives; to investigate characteristics of older people with and without an ACP conversation.Methods(1) A pre-evaluation and post-evaluation study using questionnaire data from people aged 75 years or older living in the community. (2) A prospective study using data provided by healthcare professionals (people they started an ACP conversation with).ResultsAfter implementation of ACP, significantly more people had spoken to their GP about hospitalisations, intensive care admission and treatment preferences in certain circumstances, compared with before. Advance directives were drawn up more often. People who had an ACP conversation were older, have had a cerebrovascular accident, had a clear idea about future health problems, had a preference to start ACP before they were ill, already had an ACP conversation at pre-measurement and indicated at pre-measurement that their GP knows their preferences.ConclusionResults in number of ACP conversations and advance drectives were modest but positive. ACP was implemented as routine care. GPs select people with whom they have a conversation. This can be an efficient use of time, but there is a risk that certain groups may be underserved (for example, patients with multimorbidity or patients with less health skills).

Documentation of Advance Directives and Code Status in Electronic Medical Records to Honor Goals of Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghann S. Weaver ◽  
Betty Anderson ◽  
Anne Cole ◽  
Maureen E. Lyon
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Current Approach ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Record System ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Advance Care

Advance care planning is a process that supports conversations about the values that matter most to patients and their family members. The documentation of advance directives and code status in a patient’s electronic health record (EHR) is a critical step to ensure treatment preferences are honored in the medical care received. The current approach to advanced care planning documentation in electronic medical records often remains disparate within and across EHR systems. Without a standardized format for documentation or centralized location for documentation, advance directives and even code status content are often difficult to access within electronic medical records. This case report launched our palliative care team into partnership with the Information Technology team for implementation of a centralized, standardized, longitudinal, functional documentation of advance care planning and code status in the electronic medical record system.

scholarly journals Information meetings on end-of-life care for older people by the general practitioner to stimulate advance care planning: a pre-post evaluation study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annicka G. M. van der Plas ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
Roosmarijne M. K. Kox ◽  
Marianne Ponstein ◽  
Bea Dame ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Post Evaluation ◽  
Information Meeting ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background To increase knowledge about options people have concerning end-of-life-care issues, General Practitioners (GPs) can organise meetings to inform their older patients. We evaluated these meetings, using the following research questions: How did the attendees experience the information meeting? Was there a rise in Advance Care Planning (ACP) behaviour after the information meeting? Was there a change in trust people have that physicians will provide good care at the end of life and that they will follow their end-of-life wishes after the information meetings? Methods Four GPs invited all patients of 75 years and older registered in their GP practices to the meeting via a written letter. Four meetings of 2 h took place in 2016. Meetings started with a presentation on end-of-life topics and ACP by the GP followed by time for questions. A pre-post evaluation study was done using written questionnaires distributed and filled in at the start of the meeting (T0) at the end of the meeting (T1) and 6 months after the meeting (T2). Results In total 225 older people attended a meeting of which 154 (68%) filled in the questionnaire at T0 and 145 (64%) filled in the questionnaire at T1. After six months, 90 of the 121 people who approved of being sent another questionnaire at T2, returned it (40%). The average age of the respondents was 80 years (T0). The meetings were evaluated positively by the attendees (T1). ACP issues (appointing a proxy, resuscitation, hospitalisation, euthanasia, treatment preferences under certain circumstances, preferred place of care and nursing home admittance) were discussed with a physician, a relative or both more often in the 6 months after having attended the meeting (T2), compared to before (T0). Compared to before the meeting (T0), trust in the GP providing good end-of-life care and following end-of-life wishes was higher immediately after the meeting (T1), but not after 6 months (T2). Conclusion Information meetings on end-of-life care by GPs have a positive influence on the occurrence of ACP, both with the physician and others. Although, this method especially reaches the older people that are already interested in the subject, this seems a relatively easy way to stimulate ACP.

P-43 Capacity assessment for advance care planning in older people with cognitive impairment

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A56.3-A57
Author(s):  
O Kiriaev ◽  
Emme Chacko ◽  
JD Jurgens ◽  
Meagan Ramages ◽  
P Malpas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Older People ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Capacity Assessment ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals Prevalence of Advance Care Planning Practices Among People with Chronic Diseases in Hospital and Community Settings: A Quasi-Experimental Design

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Yeun-Sim Jeong ◽  
Tomiko Barrett ◽  
Se Ok Ohr ◽  
Peter Cleasby ◽  
Ryan Davey
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Diseases ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) enables healthcare professionals to embrace the important process where patients think about their values in life and goals for health care, and discuss their future health care preferences with family members for a time when they are not able to make health care decisions. Despite the promotion of ACP last two decades, and well-known benefits of ACP and a written Advance Care Directive (ACD), they are still underutilised in Australia and across the world. Previous studies have provided some insights, however, an uptake of ACP and prevalence of ACDs in community setting is rarely reported.Methods: The aim of this study was to determine the uptake of ACP and prevalence of ACDs among people with chronic diseases in hospital and community settings. A retrospective medical record audit of eligible patients looking for evidence of ACP was conducted in 16 research sites (eight intervention and eight control) in hospital and community care settings. Participants included those who were admitted to one of the research sites, and who were aged 18 years and over with at least one of nine nominated chronic diseases. The primary outcome measures included the number of patients with evidence of ACP through the following practices: completion of an ACD, appointment of an Enduring Guardian (EG), or completion of a resuscitation plan. Results: The overall prevalence of ACD was 2.8% (n=28) out of 1006 audited records, and only 10 of them were legally binding. The number of EGs legally appointed was 39 (3.9%) across the sites. A total of 151 (15.4%) resuscitation plans were found across the eight hospital sites. 95% (n=144) of the resuscitation plans advised ‘Not-for-resuscitation’. Conclusions: The uptake of ACP is very low. Current medical recording system reveals the challenges in ACP lie in the process of storage, access and execution of the ACDs. Given that having an ACD or EG in place is only useful if the treating physician knows how and where to access the information, it has implications for policy, information system, and healthcare professionals’ education. Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618001627246). The URL of the trial registry record http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial/MyTrial.aspx

scholarly journals Advance Care Planning for Older People with Cancer and Its Implications in Asia: Highlighting the Mental Capacity and Relational Autonomy

Geriatrics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Pei Lin ◽  
Shao-Yi Cheng ◽  
Ping-Jen Chen
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Capacity Assessment ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Relational Autonomy ◽  
Healthcare Outcomes ◽  
Advance Care

With dramatically increasing proportions of older people, global ageing has remarkably influenced healthcare services and policy making worldwide. Older people represent the majority of patients with cancer, leading to the increasing demand of healthcare due to more comorbidities and inherent frailty. The preference of older people with cancer are often ignored, and they are considered incapable of making choices for themselves, particularly medical decisions. This might impede the provision of their preferred care and lead to poor healthcare outcomes. Advance care planning (ACP) is considered an effective intervention to assist older people to think ahead and make a choice in accordance with their wishes when they possess capacity to do so. The implementation of ACP can potentially lead to positive impact for patients and families. However, the assessment of mental capacity among older adults with cancer might be a crucial concern when implementing ACP, as loss of mental capacity occurs frequently during disease deterioration and functional decline. This article aims to answer the following questions by exploring the existing evidence. How does ACP develop for older people with cancer? How can we measure mental capacity and what kind of principles for assessment we should apply? What are the facilitators and barriers when implementing an ACP in this population? Furthermore, a discussion about cultural adaptation and relevant legislation in Asia is elucidated for better understanding about its cultural appropriateness and the implications. Finally, recommendations in relation to early intervention with routine monitoring and examination of capacity assessment in clinical practice when delivering ACP, reconciling patient autonomy and family values by applying the concept of relational autonomy, and a corresponding legislation and public education should be in place in Asia. More research on ACP and capacity assessment in different cultural contexts and policy frameworks is highlighted as crucial factors for successful implementation of ACP.

Decision-Making Toolkit

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-76
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Myers
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Physician Assistant ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Collaborative Partnership ◽  
Advance Care

Physician assistant (PA) training is rooted in treating the whole patient and developing a trusting and collaborative partnership with patients and their families. This foundation is critical in the advance care planning (ACP) process for patients who are seriously or terminally ill. Understanding the ACP process, the components and reasons behind them, and the tools for successful discussions and decision-making is a key skill set for all healthcare providers, including PAs. This chapter examines the components of ACP, including advance directives, the POLST paradigm, decision-makers, prognostication, documentation, and legacy planning. ACP is key in capturing what is most important to our patients in terms of their health, their life, and their goals related to both.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document