Helicopter-based in-water resuscitation with chest compressions: a pilot study

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 553-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd E Winkler ◽  
Frank Hartig ◽  
James DuCanto ◽  
Andreas Koch ◽  
Michael Georgieff ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kate Goulding ◽  
Rosa Marchetti ◽  
Rushan Perera ◽  
Richard Johnson ◽  
Michael Bailey ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 21-32
Author(s):  
Craig Vincent-Lambert ◽  
Andrew Makkink ◽  
Fredrick Kloppers

Background: Recent recommendations made by ILCOR have de-emphasised the role of advanced airway management such as “endotracheal intubation” (ETI) during cardiac arrest in favour of maximising the number of chest compressions performed by rescuers. Maximising time available for compressions is achieved by minimising hands-off time (HOT). This has led to first responders and paramedics performing single rescuer CPR using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) device as opposed to the historical practice of intubating and ventilating via an endotracheal tube. Bag-valve-mask ventilations, especially during single rescuer CPR, are however associated with complications potentially resulting in increased ventilation times. More time spent on ventilations in the single rescuer scenario naturally leads to an increase in HOT and less time being available for compressions. It is postulated that the use of an appropriate supraglottic airway device (SAD) may decrease the time spent on the ventilation component of CPR and result in a decrease in HOT.Objectives: This pilot study evaluated how interruptions to chest compressions or hands-off time (HOT) are affected by the placement of an i-gel® airway vs. simple BVM ventilation during single rescuer CPR.Method: 16 participants performed two, ten-minute single rescuer CPR simulations, firstly using the BVM and later the i-gel® airway for ventilation. Data pertaining to ventilations and HOT in each scenario was statistically analysed and compared.Results: The i-gel® airway demonstrated a superior ease of ventilation compared to BVM alone and resulted in a reduction of time spent on ventilations overall. The i-gel® however took a mean of 29 s, ± 10 s, to secure which contributes considerably to HOT.Conclusion: The use of the i-gel® airway resulted in a considerable decrease in the amount of time spent on ventilations and in more compressions being performed. The overall reduction in HOT was, however, offset by the time it took to secure the device. Further investigation into the use and securing of the i-gel® airway in single rescuer CPR is recommended.


Resuscitation ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Smekal ◽  
Jakob Johansson ◽  
Tibor Huzevka ◽  
Sten Rubertsson

Resuscitation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (9) ◽  
pp. 1203-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Qvigstad ◽  
Jo Kramer-Johansen ◽  
Øystein Tømte ◽  
Tore Skålhegg ◽  
Øyvar Sørensen ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. S8
Author(s):  
T.S. Birkenes ◽  
H. Myklebust ◽  
P. Westnes ◽  
J. Kramer-Johansen

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e047666
Author(s):  
Jennifer Parent-Nichols ◽  
Julia Perez ◽  
Brittany Witherell ◽  
Paula McWilliam ◽  
Louis P Halamek ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe biomechanics of the healthcare professionals (HCPs) performing the life-saving intervention of chest compressions in the neonatal population is poorly understood. The aim of this pilot study was to describe the variations in body position at a self-selected and a predetermined bed height during neonatal chest compressions. Measures of joint angles, time to postural sway and number of postural adjustments were chosen as indices for the stability of the HCP’s position.SettingData were collected at a simulation-based research centre in which the patient care environment was replicated.ParticipantsHCPs with varying roles working in the neonatal intensive care unit and holding a current Neonatal Resuscitation Program Provider certification were recruited for this study.InterventionsFifteen HCPs performed two trials of chest compressions, each lasting 2 min, at a predetermined bed height and a self-selected bed height. Trials were video recorded, capturing upper and lower body movements. Videos were analysed for time to postural sway and number of postural adjustments. Joint angles were measured at the start and end of each trial.ResultsA statistically significant difference was found between the two bed height conditions for number of postural adjustments (p=0.02). While not statistically significant, time postural sway was increased in the choice bed height condition (85 s) compared with the predetermined bed height (45 s). After 30 s of chest compressions, mean shoulder and knee angles were smaller for choice bed height (p=0.03, 95% CI Lower=−12.14, Upper=−0.68 and p=0.05, 95% CI Lower=3.43, Upper=0.01, respectively). After 1 min and 45 s of chest compressions, mean wrist angles were smaller in the choice bed height condition (p=0.01, 95% CI Lower=−9.20, Upper=−1.22), stride length decreased between the 30 s and 1 min 45 s marks of the chest compressions in the predetermined height condition (p=0.02).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document