scholarly journals Current state of emergency medicine education in China

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 573-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Shao ◽  
H Y Shen ◽  
X Y Shi
2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 665-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukihiro Ikegami ◽  
Shinichi Konno ◽  
Tsuyoshi Isosu ◽  
Shinju Obara ◽  
Takahiro Hakozaki ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (06) ◽  
pp. 431-438 ◽  
Author(s):  

In April 2001, the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada was established. The Honorable Roy Romanow was given the mandate to “inquire into and undertake dialogue with Canadians on the future of Canada’s public health care system” and “to develop recommendations that will ensure the long-term sustainability of a high quality, universally accessible, publicly administered health care system, for all Canadians.” The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) recognized an obligation to share in this public dialogue, to communicate the current state of emergency medicine, and to identify the components necessary to achieve excellence in emergency care. The CAEP Advocacy Committee was asked to develop a document that would educate and enlighten the Commissioner. Basic themes were identified, and authors from across the country were invited to write brief, factual essays with achievable recommendations. The resulting series of essays was presented on April 30, 2002, at the Health Care Commission’s open public hearing in Calgary, Alberta. This article, part 2 of a 2-part series, includes discussions on Emergency Department Overcrowding, Human Resources Issues in Emergency Medicine, Standardization of Care and Clinical Practice Guidelines, Informatics and the Electronic Health Record, and Research in Emergency Medicine.


Author(s):  
Paul L Weygandt ◽  
Jaime Jordan ◽  
Holly Caretta‐Weyer ◽  
Anwar Osborne ◽  
Kristen Grabow Moore

OTO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473974X1877040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Nhan ◽  
Meredith Young ◽  
Ilana Bank ◽  
Peter Nugus ◽  
Rachel Fisher ◽  
...  

Objective Emergent medical crises, such as acute airway obstruction, are often managed by interdisciplinary teams. However, resident training in crisis resource management traditionally occurs in silos. Our objective was to compare the current state of interdisciplinary crisis resource management (IDCRM) training of otolaryngology residents with other disciplines. Methods A survey study examining (1) the frequency with which residents are involved in interdisciplinary crises, (2) the current state of interdisciplinary training, and (3) the desired training was conducted targeting Canadian residents in the following disciplines: otolaryngology, anesthesiology, emergency medicine, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, pediatric emergency medicine, and pediatric/neonatal intensive care. Results A total of 474 surveys were completed (response rate, 12%). On average, residents were involved in 13 interdisciplinary crises per year. Only 8% of otolaryngology residents had access to IDCRM training, as opposed to 66% of anesthesiology residents. Otolaryngology residents reported receiving an average of 0.3 hours per year of interdisciplinary training, as compared with 5.4 hours per year for pediatric emergency medicine residents. Ninety-six percent of residents desired more IDCRM training, with 95% reporting a preference for simulation-based training. Discussion Residents reported participating in crises managed by interdisciplinary teams. There is strong interest in IDCRM and crisis resource management training; however, it is not uniformly available across Canadian residency programs. Despite their pivotal role in managing critical emergencies such as acute airway obstruction, otolaryngology residents received the least training. Implication IDCRM should be explicitly taught since it reflects reality and may positively affect patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document