Abdominal pain after attempted endoscopic mucosal resection of a right-sided colonic lesion

Gut ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sarkar ◽  
V Tagore ◽  
D White
2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. e177-e178
Author(s):  
JML Williamson ◽  
P Dunkley ◽  
D Hewin

A 25-year-old woman underwent routine day-case endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of two ascending colonic polyps. Six hours later she re-presented with severe abdominal pain. On examination she was tachycardic with tenderness and peritonism in the right lower quadrant. Urgent abdominal computed tomography (CT) did not reveal any signs of free intra-abdominal gas or fluid but did detect transmural thickening and oedema in the ascending colon and caecum. As there was no radiological evidence of perforation, the patient was managed conservatively and made a full recovery. The exact aetiology of this patient’s symptoms is not known. She may have developed post-polypectomy electrocoagulation (a transmural diathermy injury), localised ischaemia of the colonic wall (secondary to the adrenaline used during EMR) or an allergic reaction to the dye used during EMR. As EMR is an increasingly used treatment modality in the management of colonic polyps, clinicians should have an awareness of the complications of treatment. We would advocate a low threshold for prompt CT investigation in any patient presenting with abdominal pain after EMR to detect any evidence of free intraperitoneal air. Patients without signs of perforation may be managed conservatively, as in this case.


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Kuwabara ◽  
Hideyuki Chiba ◽  
Jun Tachikawa ◽  
Naoya Okada ◽  
Jun Arimoto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-197
Author(s):  
Luciano LENZ ◽  
Bruno MARTINS ◽  
Fabio Shiguehisa KAWAGUTI ◽  
Alexandre TELLIAN ◽  
Caterina Maria Pia Simoni PENNACHI ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has emerged as a revolutionary method allowing resection of colorectal lesions without submucosal injection. Brazilian literature about this technique is sparse. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR technique for removing non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in two Brazilian tertiary centers. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between June 2016 and May 2017. Naïve and non-pedunculated lesions without signs of submucosal invasion were resected using UEMR technique. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients with 65 lesions were included. All lesions, except one, were successfully and completely removed by UEMR (success rate 98.5%). During UEMR, two cases of bleeding were observed (3.0%). One patient had abdominal pain on the day after resection without pneumoperitoneum. There was no perforation or delayed bleeding. CONCLUSION: This study supports the existing data indicating acceptable rates of technical success, and low incidence of adverse events with UEMR. The results of this Brazilian study were consistent with previous abroad studies.


Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luiz Paccos ◽  
Daniela Suppo de Oliveira ◽  
Fernando J. S. de Oliveira ◽  
Eduardo M. A. Pereira Junior ◽  
Fernando L. Mota ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsinelos ◽  
Chatzimavroudis ◽  
Katsinelos ◽  
Panagiotopoulou ◽  
Kotakidou ◽  
...  

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is an overt or occult source of gastrointestinal bleeding. Despite several therapeutic approaches have been successfully tested for preventing chronic bleeding, some patients present recurrence of GAVE lesions. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case, of a 86-year-old woman who presented severe iron-deficiency anemia due to GAVE and showed recurrence of GAVE lesion despite the intensive argon plasma coagulation treatment. We performed endoscopic mucosal resection of bleeding GAVE with resolution of anemia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document