PWE-442 Balancing gastroenterology and general internal medicine training in the uk

Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A404-A405 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Biswas ◽  
L Alrubaiy
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon E. Card MD MSc

The vast majority of general internal medicine (GIM) programs in Canada have become distinct entities that provide training in additional competencies and leadership above and beyond those required for the specialty of internal medicine. In December 2010, after many years of effort, GIM finally achieved recognition as a distinct subspecialty by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. A GIM Working Group has finalized the objectives and requirements for a 2-year subspecialty training program in GIM that will follow after the existing 3-year core internal medicine training program. These documents have now been approved by the Royal College.


1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (9) ◽  
pp. 471-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Coni

This paper describes the post-take ward round of a department of medicine for the elderly (DME), to portray the nature of the medical admissions and their immediate management. The data concern the patients seen by one consultant in 28 such ward rounds during the last four months of 1997, in a teaching hospital where the DME is separate from the department of general internal medicine. 254 patients were seen, 107 men and 147 women, with an average age of 82.4 years (range 73–102). The decisions taken included diagnosis, further investigations, treatment, referral, discharge, and resuscitation status. Very few admissions were judged inappropriate, particularly among the majority referred by general practitioners. 101 patients were thought suitable for transfer to the department of general internal medicine, 109 definitely unsuitable. These findings support the view that, if medical beds are to be freed, the initiative must come from facilitating discharge rather than curtailing admission. Generalists are needed to sort and manage these patients. In the UK, these will often be general internal medicine consultant geriatricians, while the younger patients are seen by consultants practising general internal medicine in addition to one of the specialties. Sizeable numbers of these consultants are needed if the post-take ward round is to be efficient and not conflict with their fixed commitments.


1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-169
Author(s):  
Arthur M. Fournier ◽  
Mark Gelbard ◽  
Laurence B. Gardner

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-24
Author(s):  
Adnan Agha ◽  
Baldev Singh ◽  
Wasim Hanif

Diabetes and endocrinology is a medical specialty, and a five-year dual accreditation training programme in diabetes and endocrinology and general internal medicine is offered, with active participation in medical on-call rota. Some deaneries offer some respite from the ever-increasing general medical workload by offering a few months of training focusing only on specialty work in diabetes and endocrinology. The authors wanted to see if this experience is available uniformly to all the trainees in diabetes and endocrinology/ general internal medicine across Great Britain. To assess this, a survey of specialist training registrars on a dual accreditation programme for diabetes and general internal medicine from all deaneries in England, Scotland and Wales was performed by directly interviewing and asking them about any relaxation in either their on-call or ward commitments to focus on diabetes and endocrine specialty during their five years of training. The results showed that the acute take/general medical commitment-free training periodfocusing only on diabetes and endocrinology ranges from zero in some deaneries to nearly three years in others. This simple survey highlights the extent of variability that exists in dual diabetes/endocrinology and general internal medicine training programmes across deaneries in England, Scotland and Wales, which may increase further once the training programme is reduced to four years after new changes from Shape of Training.


Author(s):  
Adnan Agha ◽  
Baldev Singh ◽  
Wasim Hanif

Diabetes and endocrinology is a medical specialty, and a five-year dual accreditation training programme in diabetes and endocrinology and general internal medicine is offered, with active participation in medical on-call rota. Some deaneries offer some respite from the ever-increasing general medical workload by offering a few months of training focusing only on specialty work in diabetes and endocrinology. The authors wanted to see if this experience is available uniformly to all the trainees in diabetes and endocrinology/ general internal medicine across Great Britain. To assess this, a survey of specialist training registrars on a dual accreditation programme for diabetes and general internal medicine from all deaneries in England, Scotland and Wales was performed by directly interviewing and asking them about any relaxation in either their on-call or ward commitments to focus on diabetes and endocrine specialty during their five years of training. The results showed that the acute take/general medical commitment-free training periodfocusing only on diabetes and endocrinology ranges from zero in some deaneries to nearly three years in others. This simple survey highlights the extent of variability that exists in dual diabetes/endocrinology and general internal medicine training programmes across deaneries in England, Scotland and Wales, which may increase further once the training programme is reduced to four years after new changes from Shape of Training.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Abdullah, MD, Med, FRCPC

In 2010, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) recognized General Internal Medicine (GIM) as a distinct subspecialty. Soon after this recognition came a new written certificationexam, the successful completion of which awards the applicant the title of General Internist. For those of us who trained prior to the new status and examination, GIM was the default designation after four years of internal medicine training if a subspecialty was not pursued.What does this new subspecialty status mean for our professional identity, qualifications, and public credibility? Twelve years aftermy successful completion of the Internal Medicine (IM) certification exams, I voluntarily applied for consideration to write the first RCPSC exam in GIM, without a clear reason why. My reflection on the days leading up to the exam and writing the exam itself led me to understand why I did it. The process addressed my skepticism around designating GIM as a unique subspecialty, and through this I have come to appreciate the need for our profession to embrace revalidation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document