scholarly journals ATU-5 Percutaneous liver biopsy to confirm advanced metastatic cancer: A step too far?

Author(s):  
Dominic King ◽  
Benjamin Coupland ◽  
Anna Lock ◽  
Veronica Nanton ◽  
Prashant Patel ◽  
...  
Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-679
Author(s):  
Shuichi YAMAMOTO ◽  
Hitoshi MARUYAMA ◽  
Ayaka SEZA ◽  
Yoshio MASUYA ◽  
Toshio TUYUGUCHI ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 187 (6) ◽  
pp. W644-W649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Guilherme Amaral ◽  
Jordan Schwartz ◽  
Peter Chait ◽  
Michael Temple ◽  
Philip John ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 1396-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas B. McGill ◽  
Jorge Rakela ◽  
Alan R. Zinsmeister ◽  
Beverly J. Ott

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris V. Kowdley ◽  
Avanish M. Aggarwal ◽  
Peter B. Sachs

Author(s):  
Jana S. Hopstaken ◽  
Leon de Jong ◽  
Jurgen J. Fütterer

Abstract Purpose For the safety and success of an ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy, needle visibility and needle tip identification are critical. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the influence of an innovative echogenic sheath placed over a standard biopsy needle on needle visibility in ultrasound imaging. Materials and methods Ultrasound videos of three sheaths with different coating characteristics (echogenicity) and one conventional liver biopsy needle were recorded at two angles (30° and 60°) and two depths (5 and 10 cm) in a human cadaver. The videos were blinded for needle type and presented to five independent radiologists who used Likert-scale scoring to rank each video for six characteristics on needle visibility. In addition, a phantom model was used to acquire standardized images for quantitative evaluation of the ultrasound visibility. Comparative statistical analysis consisted of a one-way ANOVA. Results The three prototype sheaths were ranked higher than the control needle at 60° with 5 cm depth, with an equal performance for the other conditions. The radiologists expressed more confidence in taking a biopsy with the echogenic sheaths than with the control needle, with 1 Likert score difference at 30°. Contrast analysis in the phantom model showed a statistically significant effect of a sheath (p = 0.004) on echogenic intensity. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that the use of an echogenic sheath may increase needle visibility, particularly for trajectories requiring steeper insertion angles. To investigate the superiority of the echogenic sheath over conventional needles, a clinical study is necessary.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document