scholarly journals Registry-based randomised clinical trial: efficient evaluation of generic pharmacotherapies in the contemporary era

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (19) ◽  
pp. 1562-1567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troels Yndigegn ◽  
Robin Hofmann ◽  
Tomas Jernberg ◽  
Chris P Gale

Randomised clinical trials are the gold standard for testing the effectiveness of clinical interventions. However, increasing complexity and associated costs may limit their application in the investigation of key cardiovascular knowledge gaps such as the re-evaluation of generic pharmacotherapies. The registry-based randomised clinical trial (RRCT) leverages data sampling from nationwide quality registries to facilitate high participant inclusion rates at comparably low costs and, therefore, may offer a mechanism by which such clinical questions may be answered. To date, a number of studies have been conducted using such trial designs, but uncritical use of the RRCT design may lead to erroneous conclusions. The current review provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the RRCT, as well as provides an exploratory example of how a trial may be designed to test the long-term effectiveness of beta blockers in patients with myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function.

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Dor ◽  
M Haim ◽  
O Barrett ◽  
V Novack ◽  
Y Konstantino

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None Background Patients with preserved LVEF and atrioventricular block (AVB) who are anticipated for high-burden of right ventricular (RV) pacing possess a risk to develop pacing induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Aims To evaluate the incidence and outcomes of RV-PICM in this patient"s population. Methods 1013 patients with AVB underwent first time pacemaker (PM) implantation between 2002 and 2016. A total of 203 patients with normal LVEF were included. Follow-up echocardiography was examined for a decrease in LVEF > 10%. Alternative causes for cardiomyopathy were excluded. Patient"s characteristics, mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) were compared between the PICM and non-PICM groups.  Results 51 patients (25%) developed PICM, with 22 patients (11%) showing LVEF < 40%. During mean follow-up of 49.2 months, the risk of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the PICM group (35.3% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.009). LVEDD was independently associated with PICM (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17, p = 0.01) and CAD was nearly associated with PICM (HR = 2.19, 95% CI: 0.98-4.90, p = 0.06).  Conclusions The incidence of PICM in patients with normal LVEF and AVB is alarmingly high. PICM in patients with a previously normal LVEF is associated with unfavorable outcomes. Table 1 Characteristics Cohort without PICM (152) n (%) Cohort with PICM (51) n(%) p Age mean ± SD 74.6 ± 10.5 71 ± 13 0.04 Gender (male) 80 (52.6) 29 (56.9) 0.6 Pacing modeDDDVDDVVI 108 (71.1) 38 (25) 6 (3.9) 34 (66.7) 15 (29.4) 2(3.9) 0.83 Hypertension 112 (73.7) 36 (70.6) 0.67 PVD 16 (10.5) 5 (8.9) 0.88 CAD 36 (23.7) 19 (37.3) 0.01 CVA / TIA 17 (11.2) 7 (13.7) 0.63 Atrial fibrillation / flutter 18 (11.8) 9 (17.6) 0.29 COPD 15 (9.9) 2 (3.9) 0.25 Diabetes Mellitus 56 (36.8) 27 (52.9) 0.04 Chronic Kidney Disease 27 (17.9) 14 (27.5) 0.14 Statins 65 (43) 30(60) 0.04 ACE inhibitors / ARBs 52 (34.4) 18 (36) 0.84 Beta Blockers 42 (28) 10 (20) 0.26 LVEDD mm 45.13 ± 5.53 48.46 ± 5.97 <0.001 LVESD mm 25.68 ± 5.28 27.72 ± 4.67 0.02 Baseline characteristics Abstract Figure. HF and Mortality outcomes


2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 1008-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harshith R. Avula ◽  
Thomas K. Leong ◽  
Keane K. Lee ◽  
Sue Hee Sung ◽  
Alan S. Go

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document