scholarly journals High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the early rule out of myocardial infarction: time for action

Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (13) ◽  
pp. 955-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R Chapman ◽  
Nicholas L Mills
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 570-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Mueller ◽  
Martin Möckel ◽  
Evangelos Giannitsis ◽  
Kurt Huber ◽  
Johannes Mair ◽  
...  

Copeptin is currently understood as a quantitative marker of endogenous stress. It rises rapidly in multiple acute disorders including acute myocardial infarction. As a single variable, it has only modest diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction. However, the use of copeptin within a dual-marker strategy together with conventional cardiac troponin increases the diagnostic accuracy and particularly the negative predictive value of cardiac troponin alone for acute myocardial infarction. The rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction is the only application in acute cardiac care mature enough to merit consideration for routine clinical care. However, the dual-marker approach seems to provide only very small incremental value when used in combination with sensitive or high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. This review aims to update and educate regarding the potential and the procedural details, as well as the caveats and challenges of using copeptin in clinical practice.


2015 ◽  
Vol 187 (8) ◽  
pp. E243-E252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Reichlin ◽  
Raphael Twerenbold ◽  
Karin Wildi ◽  
Maria Rubini Gimenez ◽  
Nathalie Bergsma ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Marco Marchetti ◽  
Laura Camoni ◽  
Luz Irene Urbina ◽  
Alessia Biondi ◽  
Tiziana Grassi ◽  
...  

Introduction:Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. The European Society of Cardiology Guidelines have established a new definition of myocardial infarction and have strengthened the central role of cardiac troponins in cardiology diagnostics for rule-in and rule-out of non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays (hsTnI) should increase diagnostic sensitivity, and a shorter interval for ruling-in and ruling-out AMI. This analysis aims to provide an overview of the clinical, economic, organizational and ethical impact of the use of hsTnI in clinical practice of Emergency Departments (ED) in Italy.Methods:HsTnl for rule-in and rule-out of AMI in the ED is being evaluated using the EUnetHTA Core Model® framework for health technology assessment. The hsTnI HTA assessment will be completed with real-world evidence derived from a multicenter observational study which has been designed to be conducted in 12 Italian EDs, enrolling 6000 patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin, aiming to provide data from the Italian context on clinical, organizational and economic aspects of the use of the test in the ED. Endpoints of the study include: time lapses related to diagnosis, admission, treatment and discharge of patients; number of tests performed; and number of patients diagnosed with AMI.Results:Initial results from a literature review confirm the usefulness of the hsTnI assay in diagnosing AMI. Generated real-world data will be collected, analyzed and integrated to existing evidence to assess the utility of the test in real contexts, providing details relevant for organizational aspects of the use of the test in the ED.Conclusions:The use of hsTnl could improve diagnosis of AMI by allowing a faster ruling-in or ruling-out, and reducing inappropriate hospitalizations. Furthermore, this technology could represent an opportunity to reduce overall costs for the healthcare system.


Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (17) ◽  
pp. 1597-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper Boeddinghaus ◽  
Thomas Nestelberger ◽  
Raphael Twerenbold ◽  
Karin Wildi ◽  
Patrick Badertscher ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Atul Anand ◽  
Kuan Ken Lee ◽  
Andrew R. Chapman ◽  
Amy V. Ferry ◽  
Philip D. Adamson ◽  
...  

Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable myocardial infarction to be ruled out earlier, but the safety and efficacy of this approach is uncertain. We investigated whether an early-rule out pathway is safe and effective for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods: We performed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial in the Emergency Departments of seven acute care hospitals in Scotland. Consecutive patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome between December 2014 and December 2016 were included. Sites were randomized to implement an early rule-out pathway where myocardial infarction was excluded if high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations were <5 ng/L at presentation. During a prior validation phase, myocardial infarction was ruled out where troponin concentrations were <99th centile at 6-12 hours after symptom onset. The co-primary outcome was length of stay (efficacy), and myocardial infarction or cardiac death after discharge at 30 days (safety). Patients were followed for 1 year to evaluate safety and other secondary outcomes. Results: We enrolled 31,492 patients (59±17 years, 45% women) with troponin concentrations <99th centile at presentation. Length of stay was reduced from 10.1±4.1 to 6.8±3.9 hours (adjusted geometric mean ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73 to 0.83, P<0.001) following implementation, and the proportion of patients discharged increased from 50% to 71% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.75). Non-inferiority was not demonstrated for the 30-day safety outcome (upper limit of one-sided 95% CI for adjusted risk difference 0.70%, non-inferiority margin 0.50%, P=0.068), but the observed differences favoured the early rule-out pathway (0.4% [57/14,700] versus 0.3% [56/16,792]). At 1 year, the safety outcome occurred in 2.7% (396/14,700) and 1.8% (307/16,792) of patients before and after implementation (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.40, P=0.894), and there were no differences in hospital reattendance or all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and hospital admission. Whilst non-inferiority for the safety outcome was not demonstrated at 30 days, there was no increase in cardiac events at 1 year. Adoption of this pathway would have major benefits for patients and healthcare providers. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT03005158


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document