Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of HER-2 is imperative in selecting patients for targeted therapy. Most commonly used test methods for HER-2 are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). We evaluated the concordance between FISH and IHC for HER-2 in breast cancer samples using Food and Drug Administration approved tests.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Archived paraffin tissue blocks from 73 breast cancer patients were used. HER-2 immunostaining was performed using Ventana anti–HER-2 monoclonal antibody. The FISH assay was performed using PathVysion™ HER-2 DNA Probe Kit.RESULTS: Of the 73 cases 68.5% were IHC 0/1+, 15.07% were IHC 2+ and 16.44% were IHC 3+. Successful hybridisation was achieved in 72 cases. HER-2 FISH amplification was determined in 16.67% cases. Ten IHC 3+ and two IHC 2+ cases were FISH positive. Two of the IHC 3+ cases were FISH negative. Concordance rate was 100%, 18.18% and 83.33% for IHC 0/1+, 2+ and 3+ group, respectively. Total concordance was 84.72%, kappa 0.598 (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of IHC in detecting IHC 2+ and IHC 3+ cases was 16.7% and 83.3%, and the specificity was 85% and 96.67%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The consistency between the methods was highest for IHC negative and lowest for IHC equivocal cases. The immunohistochemistry showed high sensitivity for IHC 2+/3+ cases and high specificity for IHC 3+ cases. Our results support the view that false-positive rather than false-negative IHC results are a problem with HER-2/IHC testing, and that IHC should be used as an initial screening test, but IHC 2+/ 3+ results should be confirmed by FISH.

Download Full-text

Comparison of HER2 Status by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Predict Benefit From Dose Escalation of Adjuvant Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2005.11.012 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 23 (19) ◽

pp. 4287-4297 ◽

Cited By ~ 76

Author(s):

Lynn G. Dressler ◽

Donald A. Berry ◽

Gloria Broadwater ◽

David Cowan ◽

Kelly Cox ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

In Situ Hybridization ◽

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Her2 Status ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

Node Positive ◽

Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. Results Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (κ = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. Conclusion FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

Download Full-text

SP3, a reliable alternative to HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status in breast cancer patients

Journal of Clinical Pathology ◽

10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201270 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 66 (5) ◽

pp. 409-414 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Timothy Michael D'Alfonso ◽

Yi-Fang Liu ◽

Zhengming Chen ◽

Ying-Bei Chen ◽

Ashley Cimino-Mathews ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Core Biopsy ◽

In Situ Hybridisation ◽

Excisional Biopsy ◽

Needle Core Biopsy ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Biopsy Specimens ◽

Her 2

Accurate assessment of HER-2/neu gene status in breast cancer patients has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Overexpression/gene amplification of HER-2 is associated with a more aggressive clinical course and eligibility for targeted therapy with trastuzumab. A variety of immunohistochemical (IHC) antibodies and in situ hybridisation (ISH) methods have been employed to assess HER-2 status. SP3 is a rabbit monoclonal antibody that has been shown to have a high level of agreement with other anti-HER-2 antibodies and ISH methods. We assessed HER-2 status by SP3 and HercepTest IHC stains and by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on invasive breast carcinomas from paired needle core biopsy and excisional biopsy specimens from 100 patients. We compared the two antibodies with respect to concordance rates with FISH, concordance rates between samples of the same tumour, and sensitivity and specificity using FISH as the reference test. Concordance between SP3 and FISH in needle core biopsy and excisional biopsy specimens was 96% (95% CI 91.9% to 99.7%) (κ=0.89 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.00)) and 97% (95% CI 90.3% to 99.3%) (κ=0.84 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.00)), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of SP3 for detecting HER-2 overexpression/gene amplification were 78.3% and 100%, respectively, in needle core biopsy and excisional biopsy specimens. Concordance between SP3 results assessed on the needle core biopsy and excisional biopsy was 89% (95% CI 81.2% to 94.4%) (κ=0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.82)). Concordance between SP3 and HercepTest antibodies, after excluding 2+ cases, was 97.6% (95% CI 94.0% to 99.3%) (κ=0.88 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.00)). SP3 is a reliable alternative to HercepTest in evaluating HER-2 status in breast cancer patients. Like other anti-HER-2 antibodies, SP3 may serve as a diagnostic tool in breast pathology and has potential utility as an IHC biomarker in non-mammary malignancies.

Download Full-text