P243 Relative efficacy and safety of inhaled glycopyrronium+formoterol fumarate dihydrate versus other LAMA+LABA fixed-dose combinations in COPD: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

Author(s):  
MK Siddiqui ◽  
I Singh ◽  
M Jenkins ◽  
P Darken ◽  
D Guranlioglu
2020 ◽  
Vol 1;24 (1;1) ◽  
pp. E1-E14

BACKGROUND: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a most common devitalizing complication of diabetes mellitus, which is primarily characterized by sensory loss, paresthesia, prickling, pain, or allodynia. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of the interventions used in the DPN pain management and rank their order. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Randomized, controlled trials were identified through a comprehensive, systematic literature exploration, primarily utilizing the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy and safety outcomes consist of the proportion of patients reporting either 30% or 50% pain reduction and overall withdrawal or withdrawal due to adverse drug events, respectively. Effect estimates from Bayesian NMA were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Heterogeneity and convergence were assessed by using I2 and deviation information criteria. The risk of bias was evaluated by using Pedro Scale. RESULTS: A total of 3,246 potentially relevant trials were identified and screened, finally 43 trials consisting of 7,877 randomized patients met the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant treatment difference for 50% pain reduction was reported for duloxetine vs. placebo (OR: 2.50; CrI: 1.62-3.91), mirogabalin vs. placebo (OR: 3.25; CrI: 1.16-9.35), pregabalin vs. placebo (OR: 2.33; CrI: 1.69-3.27), duloxetine vs. carbamazepine (OR: 3.37; CrI: 1.07-10.90), mirogabalin vs. carbamazepine (OR: 4.39; CrI: 1.01-19.63), mirogabalin vs. lamotrigine (OR: 4.05: CrI: 1.07-15.77), pregabalin vs. lamotrigine (OR: 2.90, CrI: 1.19-7.22) and pregabalin vs. nortriptyline (OR: 4.10, CrI: 1.13-5.28). Nortriptyline reported the highest possibility of achieving 30% and 50% pain reduction. Sodium valproate and benztropine reported the highest probability of total withdrawals and withdrawals due to adverse drug events, respectively. LIMITATION: The different follow-up time of the included studies can result in the variation of intended results. CONCLUSION: Nortriptyline reported the advantage relative to other drugs in achieving 30% and 50% pain reduction from the baseline. Gabapentin reported a significance of 50% pain reduction relative to placebo. KEY WORDS: Diabetic painful neuropathy, network meta-analysis, evidence based medicine, Bayesian analysis


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 952.3-953
Author(s):  
P Thota ◽  
V Pasupuleti ◽  
D Pellegrino ◽  
VA Benites-Zapata ◽  
A Deshpande ◽  
...  

AimThe objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate efficacy and safety of therapies for cerebral toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected adults. Pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine (P-S) combination is considered the mainstay therapy for cerebral toxoplasmosis and pyrimethamine plus clindamycin (P-C) is the most common alternative treatment. Although, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has potential advantages, its use is infrequent.MethodsDesign: Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed and 4 other databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Two independent reviewers searched and identified studies and extracted data. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled across studies using random-effects models.ResultsNine studies were included (5 RCTs, 3 retrospective cohorts, 1 prospective cohort). In comparison to P-S, treatment with P-C or TMP-SMX had similar partial or complete clinical response (P-C: RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.70–1.08; TMP-SMX: RR 0.97, 95%CI 0.78–1.21), radiological response (P-C: RR 0.92, 95%CI 0.82–1.03), skin rash (P-C: RR 0.81, 95%CI 0.56–1.17; TMP-SMX: RR 0.17, 95%CI 0.02–1.29), gastrointestinal impairment (P-C: RR 5.16, 95%CI 0.66–40.11), and drug discontinuation due to adverse events (P-C: RR 0.32, 95%CI 0.07–1.47). Liver impairment was more frequent with P-S than P-C (P-C vs P-S: RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24–0.97).ConclusionsThe current evidence fails to identify one superior regimen in terms of relative efficacy or safety for the treatment of HIV-associated cerebral toxoplasmosis. Use of TMP-SMX as preferred treatment may be consistent with the available evidence and other real world considerations. Larger comparative studies are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document