scholarly journals Gender distribution and leadership trends in trauma surgery societies

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000433
Author(s):  
Shannon Marie Foster ◽  
Jennifer Knight ◽  
Catherine Garrison Velopulos ◽  
Stephanie Bonne ◽  
D'Andrea Joseph ◽  
...  

IntroductionWomen are under-represented in the surgical disciplines and gender bias is believed to play a factor. We aimed to understand the gender distribution of membership, leadership opportunities, and scientific contributions to annual trauma professional meetings as a case study of gender issues in trauma surgery.MethodsRetrospective collection of membership, leadership, presentation and publication data from 2016 to 2018 Trauma/Acute Care Surgery/Surgical Critical Care (TACSCC) Annual Meetings. Gender was assigned based on self-identification in demographic information, established relationships, or public sources.ResultsWomen remain under-represented with only 28.1% of those ascertaining American Board of Surgery certification in critical care self-identifying as female. The proportion of female members in Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) was comparable (29.4%), slightly lower for Western Trauma Association (WTA) (19.0%), and lowest for American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) (12.8%, p<0.05). In contrast, AAST had the highest proportion of female participants in executive leadership (AAST 32.5%, WTA 19.0%, EAST 18.8%) and WTA the highest for committee chairs (WTA 33.3%, AAST 27.8%, EAST 20.5%). AAST had the most significant increase in executive leadership during the last 3 years (AAST 28.6% to 41.6%). Invited lectureships, masters, panelists and senior author scientific contributions demonstrated the largest gap of academic representation of female TACSCC surgeons.ConclusionFewer women than men pursue careers in the trauma field. Continuing to provide mentorship, leadership, and scientific recognition will increase gender diversity in TACSCC. We must continue to promote, sponsor, recognize, invite, and elect ‘her’.Level of evidenceIII, Epidemiology.

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482094950
Author(s):  
Amanda Baroutjian ◽  
Mason Sutherland ◽  
John J. Hoff ◽  
Tyler Bean ◽  
Carol Sanchez ◽  
...  

Background Research productivity is critical to academic surgery and essential for advancing surgical knowledge and evidence-based practice. We aim to determine if surgeon affiliation with top US universities/hospitals (TOPS) is associated with increased research productivity measured by numbers of peer-reviewed publications in PubMed (PMIDs). Methods A bibliometric analysis was performed for PMIDs. Affiliated authors who published in trauma surgery (TS), surgical critical care (SCC), acute care surgery (ACS), and emergency general surgery (EGS) were evaluated for publications between 2015 and 2019, and lifetime productivity. Our analysis included 3443 authors from 443 different institutions. Our main outcome was PMIDs of first author (FA) and senior author (SA) in each field (2015-2019) and total lifetime publications. Results Significant differences exist between PMIDs from TOPS vs non-TOPS in FA-TS (1.34 vs 1.23, P = .001), SA-TS (1.71 vs 1.46, P < .001), total SA-PMIDs (44.10 vs 26.61, P < .001), and SA-lifetime PMIDs (90.55 vs 59.03, P < .001). There were no significant differences in PMIDs for FA or SA-SCC, FA or SA-ACS, FA or SA-EGS, FA-total PMIDs 2015-2019, or FA-lifetime PMIDs ( P > .05 for all). Conclusion There were significantly higher TS PMIDs among FAs and SAs affiliated with top US institutions in 2015-2019, along with higher total PMIDs (2015-2019) and lifetime PMIDs. These findings are of significance to future graduate medical applicants and academic surgeons who need to make decisions about training and future career opportunities.


2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Cohn ◽  
Michelle A. Price ◽  
Ronald M. Stewart ◽  
Basil A. Pruitt ◽  
Daniel L. Dent

Less than 50 per cent of surgical critical care (SCC) fellowship positions are filled each year. We surveyed senior surgical residents to determine their opinions regarding a career in SCC and acute care surgery. A survey was sent to 1348 postgraduate year 3, 4, and 5 residents in the United States. Two hundred fifty-one surveys were returned (19% response rate). Whereas 78 per cent were planning to complete a fellowship, 21 per cent expressed interest in SCC. Fifty-six per cent plan to handle SCC problems only for their own patients, whereas 39 per cent plan to turn this management over to a critical care provider. SCC fellowships were considered to be potentially more appealing if the following changes could be made to the existing structure: adding more general surgery (70% of respondents); adding more trauma experience (50%); adding emergency neurosurgery (44%); adding more emergency orthopedics (42%); or decreasing months of critical care (36%). Increasing salary enhanced appeal for 82 per cent. SCC has limited appeal for most senior surgical residents. Theoretical expansion of surgical critical fellowships to include more general or trauma surgery (acute care surgery) increased the level of interest among senior surgical residents.


2018 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 160-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin K. Cantrell ◽  
Nicholas J. Dahlgren ◽  
Bradley L. Young ◽  
Kimberly M. Hendershot

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi L. Frankel ◽  
Karyn L. Butler ◽  
Joseph Cuschieri ◽  
Randall S. Friese ◽  
Toan Huynh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 84-90
Author(s):  
Ashley M. Tameron ◽  
Kevin B. Ricci ◽  
Wendelyn M. Oslock ◽  
Amy P. Rushing ◽  
Angela M. Ingraham ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
James R. Gardner ◽  
John D. Wolfe ◽  
William C. Beck ◽  
Kevin W. Sexton ◽  
Avi Bhavaraju ◽  
...  

Objective: Communication in the hospital setting is an easy target for quality improvement. Capturing this change via communication between providers during hand-offs is necessary to reduce delays and errors. While this process has been more widely characterized in medical specialties, we designed this study to address the knowledge gap in surgical specialties.Methods: Our institution’s division of Acute Care Surgery (ACS) implemented Morning Report (MR) in October of 2015. At MR, all admissions and service transfers were discussed from Trauma, Emergency General Surgery (EGS), and Surgical Critical Care services from the previous 24 hours. This study compared patients who underwent a surgical procedure during their hospital stay before and after protocol implementation.Results: 974 patients were included in this study. The average patient was 50.3 years of age, 65.4% were white, and 51.7% were male. The average length of stay (LOS) was 8.3 days with 1.75 days to procedure. The post-MR cohort LOS was 2.7 shorter and had 0.85 fewer days to procedure. In an adjusted regression analysis, days to procedure and LOS decreased by 33% (p < .01) and 17% (p < .01) respectively.Conclusions: Implementation of MR led to a decrease in the overall LOS and days to procedure for operative patients. Our results advocate for the standard use of structured hand-offs in surgical units.


2017 ◽  
pp. 277-290
Author(s):  
Kathryn L. Butler ◽  
George Velmahos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document