Paleomagnetic constraints on the tectonic history of the Foreland Belt, southern Canadian Cordillera: preliminary results

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Enkin ◽  
P. M. Wheadon ◽  
J. Baker ◽  
K. G. Osadetz

In the southern Canadian Cordillera, the paleomagnetic memory of Paleozoic carbonate strata in the Front Ranges and Inner Foothills of the Foreland thrust and fold belt retains no record of their known deposition at low latitudes. Instead, each folded structure exhibits a similar, but asynchronous, sequence of events including an eastwardly progressing, predeformational chemical remagnetization during the Cordilleran orogeny. The remagnetization of a "western Front Ranges" structure occurs during a period of normal polarity before 130 Ma. The paleomagnetic pole requires that the subsequent deformation of the western Front Ranges is Jurassic or younger. The remagnetization of a Front Ranges structure in the Lewis thrust sheet occurs during a period of normal polarity after 130 Ma but before deformation which, from other evidence, occurred around 75 Ma. The predeformational remagnetization of an "Inner Foothills" structure occurs during a reversed magnetic period that we interpret to be after 75 Ma. An Early Cretaceous sill in the Lewis thrust sheet was remagnetized during a reverse-polarity chron prior to the end of Lewis thrust deformation, when about 70% of the present dip of the sill was acquired. Remagnetization consistently predates deformation, whereas it occurs later at more easterly localities. There are also similarities in character and style of the remagnetizations among localities. When coupled with the eastward progression of the deformation, our observations suggest that an important and pervasive, but hitherto unrecognized and unappreciated, orogenic chemical process affected Paleozoic carbonate strata in the van of the deforming Cordilleran tectonic wedge.

1977 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Roy

Chemical, thermal, and alternating field cleaning treatments indicate that the Minudie Point sedimentary beds acquired their initial magnetization slowly and progressively during a lengthy process that lasted from deposition to lithification. The magnetization carried by the pigment is separated vectorially from the magnetization acquired during the early phases and its direction is shown to be a reliable indicator of the direction of the magnetic field during lithification. The agreement between the directions of the magnetizations acquired at the beginning (175°, +15°; α95 = 6°; pole 122° E, 36° N) and at the end (172°, +20°; α95 = 5°; pole 125° E, 33° N) of the process indicates that the direction (irrespective of the sign) of the magnetic field remained virtually unchanged during the magnetization process. Slicing of specimens shows that certain apparently aberrant directions are in reality the directions of the resultant vectors of two magnetizations of opposite polarities.The recording of a normal polarity during the early phase of magnetization places these sediments below (and perhaps immediately below) the magnetic horizon marker at the base of the Permo – Upper Carboniferous interval of reversed polarity. This indicates that these beds which on geological evidence could be of Pictou or Riversdale age belong to the Riversdale Group. This result contributes to the pin-pointing of the stratigraphic position of the Carboniferous magnetic horizon marker which can be most useful for the study of the tectonic history of the ancient Carboniferous basin of eastern Canada. The study shows that this magnetic horizon marker is a valuable stratigraphic tool which can be used most effectively for global correlation of Carboniferous units.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2.1) ◽  
pp. 1-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Manzotti ◽  
Michel Ballèvrei
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Scott Howard ◽  
◽  
Robert H. Morrow ◽  
Donald T. Secor

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Southard ◽  
◽  
Gavin D. Goeler ◽  
Michael L. Williams ◽  
Timothy W. Grover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicky M. Wright ◽  
◽  
Maria Seton ◽  
Simon E. Williams ◽  
R. Dietmar Müller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document