The relationships of the M and Mu genomes of Triticum

1983 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kimber ◽  
D. Pignone ◽  
P. J. Sallee

Triploid, tetraploid, and pentaploid hybrids involving M and Mu genome species were examined for meiotic chromosome pairing. Values of the relative affinity of the genomes involved were calculated and it is concluded that there is no preferential pairing of the M and Mu genomes. Consequently it is suggested that the Mu genome of Triticum uniaristatum be changed to Un.


Genome ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholi Vorsa

Mathematical models have been developed to predict meiotic configuration frequency distributions for autoploid (random chromosome pairing) or preferential chromosome pairing behavior. Meiotic chromosome pairing was quantitatively analysed, relative to these models, in six highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) triploid (2n = 3x = 36) hybrids derived from three unrelated 4x × 2x crosses. Mean trivalent per cell frequencies ranged from 3.59 to 7.89. Excess univalents were observed in triploids of one cross and are probably a result of disturbance in chiasma formation or maintenance and (or) random pairing failure. Arm chiasmate association values (a and b) ranged from 0.72 to 1.00, with the greatest difference in arm values being 0.18. Trivalent to ring bivalent (r) ratios ranged from 0.59 to 2.02. The observed configuration frequency distributions of three triploids having r-values greater than 1 did not deviate significantly from the autoploid pairing (p = 0) model frequency distribution. Frequency distributions of three triploids having r-values less than 1 deviated significantly from the autoploid model. Ranges for pairing affinity relationships include the possibility of two genomes pairing preferentially at a frequency of 77.7% (0.444 points over the random frequency of 0.333), which suggests the presence of genome divergence in blueberry. However, violation of model assumptions could seriously bias preferential pairing estimates. Segregating genetic factors also appear to be of significance in chromosome pairing behavior.Key words: autotriploids, chromosome pairing, preferential pairing, genome divergence, meiotic configurations.



Meiotic chromosome pairing is a process that is amenable to genetic and experimental analysis. The combined use of these two approaches allows for the process to be dissected into several finite periods of time in which the developmental stages of pairing can be precisely located. Evidence is now available, in particular in plants, that shows that the pairing of homologous chromosomes, as observed at metaphase I, is affected by events occurring as early as the last premeiotic mitosis; and that the maintenance of this early determined state is subsequently maintained by constituents (presumably proteins) that are sensitive to either colchicine, temperature or gene control. A critical assessment of this evidence in wheat and a comparison of the process of pairing in wheat with the course of meiotic pairing in other plants and animals is presented.



1986 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Nowick

Meiotic chromosome pairing was examined in F1 hybrid regenerants from Oryza sativa (AA) × O. latifolia (CCDD) and O. glumaepatula (AcuAcu) × O. latifolia (CCDD) crosses produced through embryo culture. The average number of chromosome pairs in the O. sativa × O. latifolia regenerants ranged from 13.79 to 14.79. Ten to 18 bivalents were observed per cell. The average number of bivalents in the O. glumaepatula × O. latifolia regenerants ranged from 12.44 to 13.87, with 10–17 bivalents per cell. Some desynapsis occurred but 10 to 12 true bivalents remained at late metaphase in most cells. The high number of bivalents observed in the hybrids from these divergent parents indicates that a genetic system for pairing control similar to that in Triticum may be present in the Oryza genus.Key words: Oryza, embryo culture, meiosis.



1999 ◽  
Vol 262 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 781-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nara ◽  
T. Saka ◽  
T. Sawado ◽  
H. Takase ◽  
Y. Ito ◽  
...  


Nature ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 216 (5119) ◽  
pp. 1028-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. HAYTER ◽  
RALPH RILEY


Heredity ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Loidl ◽  
F Ehrendorfer ◽  
D Schweizer




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document