SYMBOLIC TREATMENT FOR THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR RIGID MULTIBODY SYSTEMS

Author(s):  
Bukoko C. Ikoki ◽  
Marc J. Richard ◽  
Mohamed Bouazara ◽  
Sélim Datoussaïd

The library of symbolic C++ routines is broadly used throughout the world. In this article, we consider its application in the symbolic treatment of rigid multibody systems through a new software KINDA (KINematic & Dynamic Analysis). Besides the attraction which represents the symbolic approach and the effectiveness of this algorithm, the capacities of algebraical manipulations of symbolic routines are exploited to produce concise and legible differential equations of motion for reduced size mechanisms. These equations also constitute a powerful tool for the validation of symbolic generation algorithms other than by comparing results provided by numerical methods. The appeal in the software KINDA resides in the capability to generate the differential equations of motion from the choice of the multibody formalism adopted by the analyst.

2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangamesh R. Deepak ◽  
Ashitava Ghosal

The recursive forward dynamics algorithm (RFDA) for a tree structured rigid multibody system has two stages. In the first stage, while going down the tree, certain equations are associated with each node. These equations are decoupled from the equations related to the node’s descendants. We refer them as the equations of RFDA of the node and the current paper derives them in a new way. In the new derivation, associated with each node, we recursively obtain the coordinates, which describe the system consisting of the node and all its descendants. The special property of these coordinates is that a portion of the equations of motion with respect to these coordinates is actually the equations of RFDA associated with the node. We first show the derivation for a two noded system and then extend to a general tree structure. Two examples are used to illustrate the derivation. While the derivation conclusively shows that equations of RFDA are part of equations of motion, it most importantly gives the associated coordinates and the left out portion of the equations of motion. These are significant insights into the RFDA.


1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. Glocker ◽  
F. Pfeiffer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Pfeiffer

Abstract Constraints in multibody systems are usually treated by a Lagrange I - method resulting in equations of motion together with the constraint forces. Going from non-minimal coordinates to minimal ones opens the possibility to project the original equations directly to the minimal ones, thus eliminating the constraint forces. The necessary procedure is described, a general example of combined machine-process dynamics discussed and a specific example given. For a n-link robot tracking a path the equations of motion are projected onto this path resulting in quadratic form linear differential equations. They define the space of allowed motion, which is generated by a polygon-system.


Author(s):  
E. Bayo ◽  
J. M. Jimenez

Abstract We investigate in this paper the different approaches that can be derived from the use of the Hamiltonian or canonical equations of motion for constrained mechanical systems with the intention of responding to the question of whether the use of these equations leads to more efficient and stable numerical algorithms than those coming from acceleration based formalisms. In this process, we propose a new penalty based canonical description of the equations of motion of constrained mechanical systems. This technique leads to a reduced set of first order ordinary differential equations in terms of the canonical variables with no Lagrange’s multipliers involved in the equations. This method shows a clear advantage over the previously proposed acceleration based formulation, in terms of numerical efficiency. In addition, we examine the use of the canonical equations based on independent coordinates, and conclude that in this second case the use of the acceleration based formulation is more advantageous than the canonical counterpart.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document