Characterization of the neuromuscular block produced by clindamycin and lincomycin

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 937-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Wright ◽  
B. Collier

The site of neuromuscular blockade induced by clindamycin and lincomycin was studied on isolated nerve and nerve–muscle preparations. Clindamycin (3.6 × 10−3 M) but not lincomycin (up to 1.5 × 10−2 M) had a local anaesthetic effect on a frog desheathed nerve preparation. Clindamycin (8 × 10−4 M) and lincomycin (4 × 10−3 M) depressed the response of the rat diaphragm to nerve stimulation and to direct muscle stimulation in parallel. This indicated that the predominant neuromuscular blocking effect of these antibiotics was due to an effect on the muscle. Clindamycin was fivefold more potent than lincomycin in this effect, and the unionized form of both drugs was the active form. Lincomycin (4 × 10−3 M) but not clindamycin (8 × 10−4 M) also had some depressant effect on nerve–muscle transmission as indicated by the interaction of the effects of the antibiotics and d-tubocurarine. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to the acute clinical toxicity of these antibiotics.


1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 926-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Wright ◽  
B. Collier

The site of neuromuscular blockade induced by polymyxin B and rolitetracycline was studied on isolated nerve and nerve–muscle preparations. Polymyxin B (1.8 × 10−4 M) was equipotent to lidocaine as a local anaesthetic on a frog desheathed nerve preparation, while rolitetracycline (up to 3.6 × 10−3 M) had no local anaesthetic effect. Polymyxin B (6 × 10−5 M) and rolitetracycline (7 × 10−4 M) blocked by 50% the response of rat diaphragm induced by phrenic nerve stimulation, but did not decrease the amount of acetylcholine (ACh) released from this preparation during nerve stimulation. Both antibiotics depressed the response of the rat diaphragm to inject ACh, and this response was more sensitive to inhibition by the drugs than was the response to nerve stimulation. With rolitetracycline, a concentration that blocked the response to nerve stimulation by 50% inhibited the response to injected ACh by 85%, and this relationship was similar to that with d-tubocurarine; however, polymyxin B was relatively more effective than d-tubocurarine in inhibiting the effect of ACh. Polymyxin B (1–1.5 × 10−4 M) but not rolitetracycline (1 × 10−3 M) depressed the response of the diaphragm to direct muscle stimulation. It is concluded that polymyxin B and rolitetracycline block neuromuscular transmission predominantly by an effect to depress the muscle's sensitivity to ACh; polymyxin B probably acts by an effect similar to that of local anaesthetics, while rolitetracycline probably acts by an effect similar to that of d-tubocurarinc.



1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Clement ◽  
E. Howard Colhoun

The rat diaphragm has been used to investigate the neuromuscular blocking action of acetylcholine mustard which yields a potent nicotinic agonist, an aziridinium ion, in aqueous medium. Evidence was obtained that the acetylcholine mustard aziridinium ion impaired neuromuscular activity when the phrenic nerve was stimulated and that the ion did not directly inhibit muscle contraction. Impairment of neuromuscular activity was characterized by a latent period and depended both on the concentration of aziridinium ion and the frequency of stimulation of the phrenic nerve. Elevated concentrations of Ca2+ and choline changed the response of the rat diaphragm to the aziridinium ion, the former increasing the rate of development of neuromuscular block and the latter protecting against neuromuscular block. These results indicated that the aziridinium ion may act either at the site of choline uptake or have an effect on acetylcholine synthesis in the nerve ending and that impairment of neuromuscular transmission in the rat diaphragm involved the availability of acetylcholine. Similar results were obtained with acetylcholine mustard aziridinium ion subjected to alkaline hydrolysis. This substance is thought to be choline mustard aziridinium ion. Although difficult to prove with the rat diaphragm it is possible that acetylcholinesterase of this preparation could hydrolyze acetylcholine mustard aziridinium ion at the neurotransmitter site and the resultant choline mustard aziridinium ion would interfere with the uptake of choline and eventually prevent neuromuscular transmission. This hemicholinium-like hypothesis for the mechanism of action of choline mustard aziridinium ion is compatible with reported data for toxicity of acetylcholine mustard aziridinium ion in the mouse.



2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-286
Author(s):  
Hudu G. Mikail ◽  
David D. Akumka ◽  
Muhammed Adamu


1994 ◽  
Vol 269 (33) ◽  
pp. 20971-20976 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Krishnan ◽  
P.N. Nair ◽  
D. Jones
Keyword(s):  


1973 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1022-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.W. EICHBAUM ◽  
W.J. YASAKA


2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 539-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARC VERLEYE ◽  
ISABELLE HEULARD ◽  
JEAN-MARIE GILLARDIN


Nature ◽  
1951 ◽  
Vol 167 (4251) ◽  
pp. 653-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. MONTAGU


1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 865
Author(s):  
Yong Ik Kim ◽  
Kyu Sik Kang ◽  
Kyung Ho Hwang ◽  
Hong Suk Yang ◽  
Sung Yell Kim ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document