Parallel Algorithms for Recognizing P5-free and ${\bar P}_5$-free Weakly Chordal Graphs

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 119-129
Author(s):  
Stavros D. Nikolopoulos ◽  
Leonidas Palios

We prove algorithmic characterizations of weakly chordal graphs, which lead to efficient parallel algorithms for recognizing P5-free and [Formula: see text]-free weakly chordal graphs. For an input graph on n vertices and m edges, our algorithms run in O( log 2n) time and require O(m2/ log n) processors on the EREW PRAM model of computation. The proposed recognition algorithms efficiently detect P5 s and [Formula: see text] in weakly chordal graphs in O( log n) time with O(m2/ log n) processors on the EREW PRAM. Additionally, we show how the algorithms can be augmented to provide a certificate for the existence of a P5 (or a [Formula: see text]) in case the input graph is not P5-free (respectively, [Formula: see text]-free) weakly chordal.

1993 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
STEPHAN OLARIU ◽  
WENHUI SHEN ◽  
LARRY WILSON

We show that the Largest Empty Rectangle problem can be solved by reducing it, in a natural way, to the All Nearest Smaller Values problem. We provide two classes of algorithms: the first one assumes that the input points are available sorted by x (resp. y) coordinate. Our algorithm corresponding to this case runs in O(log log n) time using [Formula: see text] processors in the Common-CRCW-PRAM model. For unsorted input, we present algorithms that run in [Formula: see text] time using [Formula: see text] processors in the Common-CRCW-PRAM, or in O( log n) time using [Formula: see text] processors in the EREW-PRAM model. No sub-logarithmic time parallel algorithms have been previously reported for this problem.


1996 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAOLO FERRAGINA ◽  
FABRIZIO LUCCIO

In this paper we provide three simple techniques to maintain in parallel the minimum spanning tree of an undirected graph under single or batch of edge updates (i.e., insertions and deletions). Our results extend the use of the sparsification data structure to the EREW PRAM model. For proper values of the batch size, our algorithms require less time and work than the best known dynamic parallel algorithms.


2013 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1350013
Author(s):  
SATYAJIT BANERJEE

We present an alternative implementation of the (1 – ϵ) factor NC approximation algorithm for the maximum weight matching by Hougardy et al. [1]. Our implementation, on the EREW PRAM model of computation, achieves an [Formula: see text] factor improvement on both the execution time and the number of processors.


2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 51-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. PANDA ◽  
VIJAY NATARAJAN ◽  
SAJAL K. DAS

In this paper we propose a parallel algorithm to construct a one-sided monotone polygon from a Hamiltonian 2-separator chordal graph. The algorithm requires O( log n) time and O(n) processors on the CREW PRAM model, where n is the number of vertices and m is the number of edges in the graph. We also propose parallel algorithms to recognize Hamiltonian 2-separator chordal graphs and to construct a Hamiltonian cycle in such a graph. They run in O( log 2 n) time using O(mn) processors on the CRCW PRAM model and O( log 2 n) time using O(m) processors on the CREW PRAM model, respectively.


1994 ◽  
Vol 04 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
S.B. YANG ◽  
S.K. DHALL ◽  
S. LAKSHMIVARAHAN

In this paper we present a randomized parallel algorithm for finding the connected components of a random input graph with n vertices in which the edges are chosen with probability p such that [Formula: see text]. The algorithm has O(log2 n) expected time using only O(n) processors on the EREW PRAM model. The probability that the output of our algorithm is correct is at least 1–0.6k, where k is a constant.


1993 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 367-382
Author(s):  
I.W. CHAN ◽  
D.K. FRIESEN

Two parallel geometric algorithms based on the idea of point domination are presented. The first algorithm solves the d-dimensional isothetic rectangles intersection counting problem of input size N/2d, where d>1 and N is a multiple of 2d, in O( log d−1 N) time and O(N log N) space. The second algorithm solves the direct dominance reporting problem for a set of N points in the plane in O( log N+J) time and O(N log N) space, where J denotes the maximum of the number of direct dominances reported by any single point in the set. Both algorithms make use of the EREW PRAM (Exclusive Read Exclusive Write Parallel Random Access Machine) consisting of O(N) processors as the computational model.


1995 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 273-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
HANS-PETER LENHOF ◽  
MICHIEL SMID

Let S be a set of n points in D-dimensional space, where D is a constant, and let k be an integer between 1 and [Formula: see text]. A new and simpler proof is given of Salowe’s theorem, i.e., a sequential algorithm is given that computes the k closest pairs in the set S in O(n log n+k) time, using O(n+k) space. The algorithm fits in the algebraic decision tree model and is, therefore, optimal. Salowe’s algorithm seems difficult to parallelize. A parallel version of our algorithm is given for the CRCW-PRAM model. This version runs in O((log n)2 log log n) expected parallel time and has an O(n log n log log n+k) time-processor product. Finally, actual running times are given of an implementation of our sequential algorithm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document