scholarly journals A quantum interpretation of the physical basis of mass–energy equivalence

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (18) ◽  
pp. 2030002
Author(s):  
Donald C. Chang

We know energy and mass of a particle can be connected by [Formula: see text]. What is the physical basis of this relation? Historically, it was thought to be based on the principle of relativity (PR). A careful examination of the literature, however, indicated that this understanding is not true. Einstein did not derive this relation from PR. Instead, his argument was mainly based on thought experiments, which focused on the similarity between radiation and matter. Following this hint, we suspect that the mass–energy equivalence could be based on the quantum property of wave–particle duality. We know photon and electron can behave as a particle as well as a wave. Such a wave property could make the particle behave differently from Newtonian mechanics. Indeed, using a wave model which treats particles as excitations of the vacuum, we show that the mass–energy equivalence relation can be directly derived based on the quantum relations of Planck and de Broglie. This wave hypothesis has several advantages; not only can it explain naturally why particles can be created in the vacuum; it also predicts that a particle cannot travel faster than the speed of light. This hypothesis can also be tested in experiment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrus Master-Khodabakhsh

The purpose of this paper is to show how the result of an erroneous experiment and the lack of understanding of the basic laws of Newtonian mechanics and its application diverted the progress of an important branch of theoretical physics from its true path and led to the creation of the theory of relativity (SR). Every year, many new papers regarding this theory are published that show its many contradictions and anomalies. This paper shows why Einstein's theory of relativity is theoretically and fundamentally incorrect and why, despite its problems, the theory gives some empirical predictions. A more logical solution based on Newtonian mechanics and on experiments and observations plus the concept of ether, leading to the same results, is proposed. As an example, mass-energy equivalence <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≅</mml:mo> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> is derived to show that Newtonian mechanics is adequate in the domain of high-speed particles. The derivation in this paper is by a similar technique to what has been previously published by the same author but with a different method of calculation. The paper also shows that SR does not explain, as claimed by Einstein, the null result of the Michelson and Morley experiment, which is the basis for the theory. It explains why the error in the experiment is hidden and difficult to detect. It also gives more information about the three previously published papers by the same author and endeavors to give a more comprehensive explanation as to what went wrong in this branch of theoretical physics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit Srečko Šorli

Editor's Note: this Article has been retracted; the Retraction Note is available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80949-z.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoliang Miao

The problem about "who is right in relativity and Newtonian mechanics" is analyzed and discussed, and the theoretical results described in this study are only used as reference. This study reveals that there is no contradiction between relativity and Newtonian mechanics, and the essence of the relativity lies in the mass energy equation. 


1983 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Steck ◽  
Frank Rioux

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document