Numerical upper bounds on growth of automaton groups

Author(s):  
Jérémie Brieussel ◽  
Thibault Godin ◽  
Bijan Mohammadi

The growth of a finitely generated group is an important geometric invariant which has been studied for decades. It can be either polynomial, for a well-understood class of groups, or exponential, for most groups studied by geometers, or intermediate, that is between polynomial and exponential. Despite recent spectacular progresses, the class of groups with intermediate growth remains largely mysterious. Many examples of such groups are constructed using Mealy automata. The aim of this paper is to give an algorithmic procedure to study the growth of such automaton groups, and more precisely to provide numerical upper bounds on their exponents. Our functions retrieve known optimal bounds on the famous first Grigorchuk group. They also improve known upper bounds on other automaton groups and permitted us to discover several new examples of automaton groups of intermediate growth. All the algorithms described are implemented in GAP, a language dedicated to computational group theory.

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Mark Sapir

We show how a recent result of Hrushovsky [Stable group theory and approximate subgroups, J. Amer. Math. Soc.25(1) (2012) 189–243] implies that if an asymptotic cone of a finitely generated group is locally compact, then the group is virtually nilpotent.


2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 73-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURENT BARTHOLDI

In 1980, Rostislav Grigorchuk constructed an infinite finitely generated torsion 2-group G, called the first Grigorchuk group, and in 1983 showed that it is of intermediate growth, with the following estimates on its growth function γ (See [6]): [Formula: see text] where β= log 32(31)≈ 0.991. He conjectured that the lower bound is actually tight. In this paper we improve the lower bound to [Formula: see text] where α≈0.5157, and thus disproves the conjecture.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
STEVEN HURDER ◽  
OLGA LUKINA

A Cantor action is a minimal equicontinuous action of a countably generated group $G$ on a Cantor space $X$ . Such actions are also called generalized odometers in the literature. In this work, we introduce two new conjugacy invariants for Cantor actions, the stabilizer limit group and the centralizer limit group. An action is wild if the stabilizer limit group is an increasing sequence of stabilizer groups without bound and otherwise is said to be stable if this group chain is bounded. For Cantor actions by a finitely generated group $G$ , we prove that stable actions satisfy a rigidity principle and furthermore show that the wild property is an invariant of the continuous orbit equivalence class of the action. A Cantor action is said to be dynamically wild if it is wild and the centralizer limit group is a proper subgroup of the stabilizer limit group. This property is also a conjugacy invariant and we show that a Cantor action with a non-Hausdorff element must be dynamically wild. We then give examples of wild Cantor actions with non-Hausdorff elements, using recursive methods from geometric group theory to define actions on the boundaries of trees.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack O. Button

AbstractWe show, using acylindrical hyperbolicity, that a finitely generated group splitting over


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 595-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. LIRIANO ◽  
S. MAJEWICZ

If G is a finitely generated group and A is an algebraic group, then RA(G) = Hom (G, A) is an algebraic variety. Define the "dimension sequence" of G over A as Pd(RA(G)) = (Nd(RA(G)), …, N0(RA(G))), where Ni(RA(G)) is the number of irreducible components of RA(G) of dimension i (0 ≤ i ≤ d) and d = Dim (RA(G)). We use this invariant in the study of groups and deduce various results. For instance, we prove the following: Theorem A.Let w be a nontrivial word in the commutator subgroup ofFn = 〈x1, …, xn〉, and letG = 〈x1, …, xn; w = 1〉. IfRSL(2, ℂ)(G)is an irreducible variety andV-1 = {ρ | ρ ∈ RSL(2, ℂ)(Fn), ρ(w) = -I} ≠ ∅, thenPd(RSL(2, ℂ)(G)) ≠ Pd(RPSL(2, ℂ)(G)). Theorem B.Let w be a nontrivial word in the free group on{x1, …, xn}with even exponent sum on each generator and exponent sum not equal to zero on at least one generator. SupposeG = 〈x1, …, xn; w = 1〉. IfRSL(2, ℂ)(G)is an irreducible variety, thenPd(RSL(2, ℂ)(G)) ≠ Pd(RPSL(2, ℂ)(G)). We also show that if G = 〈x1, . ., xn, y; W = yp〉, where p ≥ 1 and W is a word in Fn = 〈x1, …, xn〉, and A = PSL(2, ℂ), then Dim (RA(G)) = Max {3n, Dim (RA(G′)) +2 } ≤ 3n + 1 for G′ = 〈x1, …, xn; W = 1〉. Another one of our results is that if G is a torus knot group with presentation 〈x, y; xp = yt〉 then Pd(RSL(2, ℂ)(G))≠Pd(RPSL(2, ℂ)(G)).


1971 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert Baumslag

We exhibit a 3-generator metabelian group which is not finitely related but has a trivial multiplicator.1. The purpose of this note is to establish the exitense of a finitely generated group which is not finitely related, but whose multiplecator is finitely generated. This settles negatively a question whichb has been open for a few years (it was first brought to my attention by Michel Kervaire and Joan Landman Dyer in 1964, but I believe it is somewhat older). The group is given in the follwing theorem.


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1803-1816 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. E. RAJA

AbstractLet K be a compact metrizable group and Γ be a finitely generated group of commuting automorphisms of K. We show that ergodicity of Γ implies Γ contains ergodic automorphisms if center of the action, Z(Γ)={α∈Aut(K)∣α commutes with elements of Γ} has descending chain condition. To explain that the condition on the center of the action is not restrictive, we discuss certain abelian groups which, in particular, provide new proofs to the theorems of Berend [Ergodic semigroups of epimorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.289(1) (1985), 393–407] and Schmidt [Automorphisms of compact abelian groups and affine varieties. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 61 (1990), 480–496].


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadijeh Alibabaei

AbstractWe show that the wreath product of a finitely generated abelian group with a polycyclic group is a LERF group. This theorem yields as a corollary that finitely generated free metabelian groups are LERF, a result due to Coulbois. We also show that a free solvable group of class 3 and rank at least 2 does not contain a strictly ascending HNN-extension of a finitely generated group. Since such groups are known not to be LERF, this settles, in the negative, a question of J. O. Button.


Author(s):  
Patrizia Longobardi ◽  
Mercede Maj ◽  
Akbar Rhemtulla ◽  
Howard Smith

AbstractGroups in which every infinite set of subgroups contains a pair that permute were studied by M. Curzio, J. Lennox, A. Rhemtulla and J. Wiegold. The question whether periodic groups in this class were locally finite was left open. Here we show that if the generators of such a group G are periodic then G is locally finite. This enables us to get the following characterisation. A finitely generated group G is centre-by-finite if and only if every infinite set of subgroups of G contains a pair that permute.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document