PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT-BASED GAUSSIAN AFFINE TERM STRUCTURE MODELS: CONSTRAINTS AND THEIR FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050008
Author(s):  
RICCARDO REBONATO ◽  
IVAN SAROKA ◽  
VLAD PUTIATYN

This work builds on the work by Joslin et al. [(2011) A new perspective on Gaussian dynamic term structure Models, The Review of Financial Studies 24, 926–970] on the affine dynamics of portfolios of yields and addresses the unresolved issues of ‘internal consistency’ mentioned in the same paper. It shows the unexpected constraints that have to be satisfied by the [Formula: see text]-measure evolution of the yield curve if the portfolio of yields has to be interpreted as their principal components. This choice of state variables is common in the recent literature and so our findings are intrinsically interesting. However, we show that our results also extend to a wide class of choices for state variables, when these are chosen as linear combinations of yields. We show that these constraints have important financial consequences, which, to our knowledge, have not been appreciated. In particular, this paper highlights some puzzling issues of compatibility between the [Formula: see text]- and [Formula: see text]-measure dynamics of Gaussian dynamic term structure models when principal components are chosen as state variables, once the constraints we derive are taken into account.

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caio Ibsen Rodrigues de Almeida

In econometric applications of the term structure, affine models are among the most used ones. Nevertheless, even presenting a closed form characteristic function, its estimation procedure still presents many points to be understood and difficulties to be removed. In this note, we address one of these points. Suppose we estimate an affine dynamic term structure model, and also apply principal component analysis to the interest rate database available. A very plausible question would inquire about the relation (if any) between the principal components obtained assuming no dynamic restrictions, and the dynamic factors estimated using the proposed term structure model. We answer this question when estimating a standard affine model using zero coupon data. We show that each principal component can be approximated by a linear transformation of the dynamic factors. Although simple, this is an important step to the understanding of the mechanics of dynamic affine term structure models. A numerical example using U.S. zero data illustrates the result


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huarong Tang ◽  
Yihong Xia

AbstractWe examine the yield curve behavior and the relative performance of affine term structure models (ATSMs) using government bond yield data from Canada, Germany, Japan, the U.K., and the U.S. We find strong predictability of forward rates for excess bond returns and reject the expectations hypothesis in all five countries. A three-factor model is sufficient to capture movements in the yield curve of Canada, Japan, the U.K., and the U.S., but may not be enough for Germany. An exhaustive comparison among ATSMs with no more than three factors reveals that the three-factor essential affine model (A1(3)E), with only one factor affecting the volatility of the short rate but with all three factors affecting the price of risk, performs best in all five countries. Simulations provide inconclusive evidence on whether this best affine model can successfully generate the rich yield curve behavior observed in the data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document