An Engel condition with b-generalized derivations for Lie ideals

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pao-Kuei Liau ◽  
Cheng-Kai Liu

Let [Formula: see text] be a prime ring with the extended centroid [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] a noncommutative Lie ideal of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] a nonzero [Formula: see text]-generalized derivation of [Formula: see text]. For [Formula: see text], let [Formula: see text]. We prove that if [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] are fixed positive integers, then there exists [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] except when [Formula: see text], the [Formula: see text] matrix ring over a field [Formula: see text]. The analogous result for generalized skew derivations is also described. Our theorems naturally generalize the cases of derivations and skew derivations obtained by Lanski in [C. Lanski, An Engel condition with derivation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (1993), 75–80, Skew derivations and Engel conditions, Comm. Algebra 42 (2014), 139–152.]

Author(s):  
Rita Prestigiacomo

Let [Formula: see text] be a prime ring with [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] a non-central Lie ideal of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] its Martindale quotient ring and [Formula: see text] its extended centroid. Let [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be nonzero generalized derivations on [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] Then there exists [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], for any [Formula: see text], unless [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the algebraic closure of [Formula: see text].


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 369-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Xu ◽  
Jing Ma ◽  
Fengwen Niu

Let R be a prime ring with extended centroid C, maximal right ring of quotients U, a nonzero ideal I and a generalized derivation δ. Suppose δ(x)n =(ax)n for all x ∈ I, where a ∈ U and n is a fixed positive integer. Then δ(x)=λax for some λ ∈ C. We also prove two generalized versions by replacing I with a nonzero left ideal [Formula: see text] and a noncommutative Lie ideal L, respectively.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Scudo ◽  
Abu Zaid Ansari

AbstractLet R be a non-commutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2, U the Utumi quotient ring of R, C the extended centroid of R, L a non-central Lie ideal of R, G a non-zero generalized derivation of R.If [G(u), u](1) R satisfies the standard identity s(2) there exists γ ∈ C such that G(x) = γx for all x ∈ R.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (spec01) ◽  
pp. 841-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo De Filippis ◽  
Nadeem ur Rehman

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2 with extended centroid C. Let F be a generalized derivation of R, L a non-central Lie ideal of R, f(x1, …, xn) a polynomial over C and f(R)={f(r1, …, rn): ri ∈ R}. We study the following cases: (1) [F(u), F(v)]k=0 for all u, v ∈ L, where k ≥ 1 is a fixed integer; (2) [F(u), F(v)] = 0 for all u, v ∈ f(R); (3) F(u) ◦ F(v)=0 for all u, v ∈ f(R); (4) F(u) ◦ F(v)=u ◦ v for all u, v ∈ f(R). We obtain a description of the structure of R and information on the form of F.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Shuliang Huang ◽  
Nadeem Ur Rehman

Let $R$ be a prime ring, $I$ a nonzero ideal of $R$ and $m, n$  fixed positive integers.  If $R$ admits a generalized derivation $F$ associated with a  nonzero derivation $d$ such that $(F([x,y])^{m}=[x,y]_{n}$ for  all $x,y\in I$, then $R$ is commutative. Moreover  we also examine the case when $R$ is a semiprime ring.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
V. De Filippis ◽  
G. Scudo ◽  
L. Sorrenti

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, with extended centroid C, U its two-sided Utumi quotient ring, F a nonzero generalized derivation of R, f(x1,…,xn) a noncentral multilinear polynomial over C in n noncommuting variables, and a,b∈R such that a[F(f(r1,…,rn)),f(r1,…,rn)]b=0 for any r1,…,rn∈R. Then one of the following holds: (1) a=0; (2) b=0; (3) there exists λ∈C such that F(x)=λx, for all x∈R; (4) there exist q∈U and λ∈C such that F(x)=(q+λ)x+xq, for all x∈R, and f(x1,…,xn)2 is central valued on R; (5) there exist q∈U and λ,μ∈C such that F(x)=(q+λ)x+xq, for all x∈R, and aq=μa, qb=μb.


Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (19) ◽  
pp. 6251-6266
Author(s):  
S.K. Tiwari ◽  
B. Prajapati

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2 and F a b-generalized derivation on R. Let U be Utumi quotient ring of R with extended centroid C and f (x1,..., xn) be a multilinear polynomial over C which is not central valued on R. Suppose that d is a non zero derivation on R such that d([F(f(r)), f(r)]) ? C for all r = (r1,..., rn) ? Rn, then one of the following holds: (1) there exist a ? U, ? ? C such that F(x) = ax + ?x + xa for all x ? R and f (x1,..., xn)2 is central valued on R, (2) there exists ? ? C such that F(x) = ?x for all x ? R.


Filomat ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1285-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emine Albaş ◽  
Nurcan Argaç ◽  
Filippis de

Let R be a non-commutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2 with Utumi quotient ring U and extended centroid C, L a non-central Lie ideal of R, F and G two non-zero generalized derivations of R. If [F(u),u]G(u) = 0 for all u ? L, then one of the following holds: (a) there exists ? ? C such that F(x) = ?x, for all x ? R; (b) R ? M2(F), the ring of 2 x 2 matrices over a field F, and there exist a ? U and ? ? C such that F(x) = ax + xa + ?x, for all x ? R.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basudeb Dhara ◽  
Shervin Sahebi ◽  
Venus Rahmani

AbstractLet R be a prime ring with center Z(R) and extended centroid C, H a non-zero generalized derivation of R and n ≥ 1 a fixed integer. In this paper we study the situations:(1) H(u(2) H(u


Author(s):  
Huang Shuliang

LetRbe an associative prime ring,Ua Lie ideal such thatu2∈Ufor allu∈U. An additive functionF:R→Ris called a generalized derivation if there exists a derivationd:R→Rsuch thatF(xy)=F(x)y+xd(y)holds for allx,y∈R. In this paper, we prove thatd=0orU⊆Z(R)if any one of the following conditions holds: (1)d(x)∘F(y)=0, (2)[d(x),F(y)=0], (3) eitherd(x)∘F(y)=x∘yord(x)∘F(y)+x∘y=0, (4) eitherd(x)∘F(y)=[x,y]ord(x)∘F(y)+[x,y]=0, (5) eitherd(x)∘F(y)−xy∈Z(R)ord(x)∘F(y)+xy∈Z(R), (6) either[d(x),F(y)]=[x,y]or[d(x),F(y)]+[x,y]=0, (7) either[d(x),F(y)]=x∘yor[d(x),F(y)]+x∘y=0for allx,y∈U.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document