K-theory of coherent rings

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (09) ◽  
pp. 1950161
Author(s):  
Richard G. Swan

We show that some basic results on the K-theory of noetherian rings can be extended to coherent rings.

1989 ◽  
Vol s2-39 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Hodges
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (736) ◽  
pp. 95-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Morrow

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to study pro excision in algebraicK-theory and cyclic homology, after Suslin–Wodzicki, Cuntz–Quillen, Cortiñas, and Geisser–Hesselholt, as well as continuity properties of André–Quillen and Hochschild homology. A key tool is first to establish the equivalence of various pro Tor vanishing conditions which appear in the literature.This allows us to prove that all ideals of commutative, Noetherian rings are pro unital in a suitable sense. We show moreover that such pro unital ideals satisfy pro excision in derived Hochschild and cyclic homology. It follows hence, and from the Suslin–Wodzicki criterion, that ideals of commutative, Noetherian rings satisfy pro excision in derived Hochschild and cyclic homology, and in algebraicK-theory.In addition, our techniques yield a strong form of the pro Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg theorem; an extension to general base rings of the Cuntz–Quillen excision theorem in periodic cyclic homology; a generalisation of the Feĭgin–Tsygan theorem; a short proof of pro excision in topological Hochschild and cyclic homology; and new Artin–Rees and continuity statements in André–Quillen and Hochschild homology.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050007
Author(s):  
Weiqing Li ◽  
Dong Liu

Let [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be arbitrary fixed integers. We prove that there exists a ring [Formula: see text] such that: (1) [Formula: see text] is a right [Formula: see text]-ring; (2) [Formula: see text] is not a right [Formula: see text]-ring for each non-negative integer [Formula: see text]; (3) [Formula: see text] is not a right [Formula: see text]-ring [Formula: see text]for [Formula: see text], for each non-negative integer [Formula: see text]; (4) [Formula: see text] is a right [Formula: see text]-coherent ring; (5) [Formula: see text] is not a right [Formula: see text]-coherent ring. This shows the richness of right [Formula: see text]-rings and right [Formula: see text]-coherent rings, and, in particular, answers affirmatively a problem posed by Costa in [D. L. Costa, Parameterizing families of non-Noetherian rings, Comm. Algebra 22 (1994) 3997–4011.] when the ring in question is non-commutative.


Author(s):  
Eugenia Ellis ◽  
Rafael Parra

Let [Formula: see text] be a strong [Formula: see text]-coherent ring such that each finitely [Formula: see text]-presented [Formula: see text]-module has finite projective dimension. We consider [Formula: see text] the full subcategory of [Formula: see text]-Mod of finitely [Formula: see text]-presented modules. We prove that [Formula: see text] is an exact category, [Formula: see text] for every [Formula: see text] and we obtain an expression of [Formula: see text].


1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Garavaglia

The main theorem of this paper states that if R is a ring and is a totally transcendental R-module, then has a unique decomposition as a direct sum of indecomposable R-modules. Natural examples of totally transcendental modules are injective modules over noetherian rings, artinian modules over commutative rings, projective modules over left-perfect, right-coherent rings, and arbitrary modules over Σ – α-gens rings. Therefore, our decomposition theorem yields as special cases the purely algebraic unique decomposition theorems for these four classes of modules due to Matlis; Warfield; Mueller, Eklof, and Sabbagh; and Shelah and Fisher. These results and a number of other corollaries about totally transcendental modules are covered in §1. In §2, I show how the results of § 1 can be used to give an improvement of Baur's classification of ω-categorical modules over countable rings. In §3, the decomposition theorem is used to study modules with quantifier elimination over noetherian rings.The goals of this section are to prove the decomposition theorem and to derive some of its immediate corollaries. I will begin with some notational conventions. R will denote a ring with an identity element. LR is the language of left R-modules described in [4, p. 251] and TR is the theory of left R-modules. “R-module” will mean “unital left R-module”. A formula will mean an LR-formula.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (07) ◽  
pp. 1950137
Author(s):  
Lixin Mao

Given an [Formula: see text]-module [Formula: see text] and a class of [Formula: see text]-modules [Formula: see text] over a commutative ring [Formula: see text], we investigate the relationship between the existence of [Formula: see text]-envelopes (respectively, [Formula: see text]-covers) and the existence of [Formula: see text]-envelopes or [Formula: see text]-envelopes (respectively, [Formula: see text]-covers or [Formula: see text]-covers) of modules. As a consequence, we characterize coherent rings, Noetherian rings, perfect rings and Artinian rings in terms of envelopes and covers by [Formula: see text]-projective, [Formula: see text]-flat, [Formula: see text]-injective and [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]-injective modules, where [Formula: see text] is a semidualizing [Formula: see text]-module.


Author(s):  
John Cozzens ◽  
CArl Faith
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document