On rings whose quasi-injective modules are injective or semisimple

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bülent Saraç
Keyword(s):  
Middle Class ◽  
Direct Product ◽  
Prime Ring ◽  
Artinian Ring ◽  
Type I ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Injective Modules

Two obvious classes of quasi-injective modules are those of semisimples and injectives. In this paper, we study rings with no quasi-injective modules other than semisimples and injectives. We prove that such rings fall into three classes of rings, namely, (i) QI-rings, (ii) rings with no middle class, or (iii) rings that decompose into a direct product of a semisimple Artinian ring and a strongly prime ring. Thus, we restrict our attention to only strongly prime rings and consider hereditary Noetherian prime rings to shed some light on this mysterious case. In particular, we prove that among these rings, QIS-rings which are not of type (i) or (ii) above are precisely those hereditary Noetherian prime rings which are idealizer rings from non-simple QI-overrings.

Some variations of projectivity

2021 ◽  
pp. 2250236
Author(s):  
Nil Orhan Ertaş ◽  
Rachid Tribak
Keyword(s):  
Middle Class ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Artinian Ring ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Commutative Noetherian Ring ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Direct Sum ◽  
Semisimple Modules ◽  
Injective Modules ◽  
Semisimple Ring

We prove that a ring [Formula: see text] has a module [Formula: see text] whose domain of projectivity consists of only some injective modules if and only if [Formula: see text] is a right noetherian right [Formula: see text]-ring. Also, we consider modules which are projective relative only to a subclass of max modules. Such modules are called max-poor modules. In a recent paper Holston et al. showed that every ring has a p-poor module (that is a module whose projectivity domain consists precisely of the semisimple modules). So every ring has a max-poor module. The structure of all max-poor abelian groups is completely determined. Examples of rings having a max-poor module which is neither projective nor p-poor are provided. We prove that the class of max-poor [Formula: see text]-modules is closed under direct summands if and only if [Formula: see text] is a right Bass ring. A ring [Formula: see text] is said to have no right max-p-middle class if every right [Formula: see text]-module is either projective or max-poor. It is shown that if a commutative noetherian ring [Formula: see text] has no right max-p-middle class, then [Formula: see text] is the ring direct sum of a semisimple ring [Formula: see text] and a ring [Formula: see text] which is either zero or an artinian ring or a one-dimensional local noetherian integral domain such that the quotient field [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] has a proper [Formula: see text]-submodule which is not complete in its [Formula: see text]-topology. Then we show that a commutative noetherian hereditary ring [Formula: see text] has no right max-p-middle class if and only if [Formula: see text] is a semisimple ring.

m-potent commutators involving skew derivations and multilinear polynomials

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ashraf ◽  
Sajad Ahmad Pary ◽  
Mohd Arif Raza
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Quotient Ring ◽  
Multilinear Polynomial ◽  
Extended Centroid ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Skew Derivation ◽  
Martindale Quotient Ring ◽  
Multilinear Polynomials ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractLet {\mathscr{R}} be a prime ring, {\mathscr{Q}_{r}} the right Martindale quotient ring of {\mathscr{R}} and {\mathscr{C}} the extended centroid of {\mathscr{R}}. In this paper, we discuss the relationship between the structure of prime rings and the behavior of skew derivations on multilinear polynomials. More precisely, we investigate the m-potent commutators of skew derivations involving multilinear polynomials, i.e.,\big{(}[\delta(f(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n})),f(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n})]\big{)}^{m}=[% \delta(f(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n})),f(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n})],where {1<m\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}}, {f(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n})} is a non-central multilinear polynomial over {\mathscr{C}} and δ is a skew derivation of {\mathscr{R}}.

scholarly journals σ- ideals and generalized derivations in σ-prime rings

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
M. Rais Khan ◽  
Deepa Arora ◽  
M. Ali Khan
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Generalized Derivations ◽  
Prime Rings

Let R be a prime ring and F and G be generalized derivations of R with associated derivations d and g respectively. In the present paper, we shall investigate the commutativity of R admitting generalized derivations F and G satisfying any one of the properties: (i) F(x)x = x G(x), (ii) F(x2) = x2 , (iii) [F(x), y] = [x, G(y)], (iv) d(x)F(y) = xy, (v) F([x, y]) = [F(x), y] + [d(y), x] and (vi) F(x ◦ y) = F(x) ◦ y − d(y) ◦ x for all x, y in some appropriate subset of R.

scholarly journals Generalized Left Jordan ideals In Prime Rings

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (72) ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
Kassim A. Jassim ◽  
Ali Kareem Kadhim
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Prime Rings

     Let R be a prime ring and U be a (σ,τ)-left Jordan ideal .Then in this paper, we proved the following , if aU Z (Ua Z), a R, then a = 0 or U Z. If aU C s,t (Ua  C s,t), a R, then  either a = 0   or   U Z. If  0 ≠ [U,U] s,t .Then U Z. If  0≠[U,U] s,t C s,t, then   U Z  .Also, we checked the converse  some of these theorems and showed that are not true, so we give an example for them.

scholarly journals Multiplicative (generalized)-derivations of prime rings that act as $n$-(anti)homomorphisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
G.S. Sandhu
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Generalized Derivations ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
The Given

Let R be a prime ring. In this note, we describe the possible forms of multiplicative (generalized)-derivations of R that act as n-homomorphism or n-antihomomorphism on nonzero ideals of R. Consequently, from the given results one can easily deduce the results of Gusić ([7]).

scholarly journals On Higher N-Derivation Of Prime Rings

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-219
Author(s):  
Baghdad Science Journal
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Torsion Free

The main purpose of this work is to introduce the concept of higher N-derivation and study this concept into 2-torsion free prime ring we proved that:Let R be a prime ring of char. 2, U be a Jordan ideal of R and be a higher N-derivation of R, then , for all u U , r R , n N .

scholarly journals Semi derivations of prime gamma rings

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Kalyan Kumar Dey ◽  
Akhil Chandra Paul
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Additive Mapping ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Subject Classifications ◽  
Associated Function ◽  
Gamma Rings

Let M be a prime ?-ring satisfying a certain assumption (*). An additive mapping f : M ? M is a semi-derivation if f(x?y) = f(x)?g(y) + x?f(y) = f(x)?y + g(x)?f(y) and f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) for all x, y?M and ? ? ?, where g : M?M is an associated function. In this paper, we generalize some properties of prime rings with semi-derivations to the prime &Gamma-rings with semi-derivations. 2000 AMS Subject Classifications: 16A70, 16A72, 16A10.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/ganit.v31i0.10309GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. Soc. (ISSN 1606-3694) 31 (2011) 65-70

A GENERALIZATION OF BAER'S LOWER NILRADICAL FOR MODULES

2007 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 337-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAHMOOD BEHBOODI
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Artinian Ring ◽  
Prime Radical ◽  
Nilpotent Elements ◽  
Noetherian Domain ◽  
Prime Submodules ◽  
Strongly Nilpotent ◽  
Commutative Domain ◽  
Torsion Modules

Let M be a left R-module. A proper submodule P of M is called classical prime if for all ideals [Formula: see text] and for all submodules N ⊆ M, [Formula: see text] implies that [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text]. We generalize the Baer–McCoy radical (or classical prime radical) for a module [denoted by cl.rad R(M)] and Baer's lower nilradical for a module [denoted by Nil *(RM)]. For a module RM, cl.rad R(M) is defined to be the intersection of all classical prime submodules of M and Nil *(RM) is defined to be the set of all strongly nilpotent elements of M (defined later). It is shown that, for any projective R-module M, cl.rad R(M) = Nil *(RM) and, for any module M over a left Artinian ring R, cl.rad R(M) = Nil *(RM) = Rad (M) = Jac (R)M. In particular, if R is a commutative Noetherian domain with dim (R) ≤ 1, then for any module M, we have cl.rad R(M) = Nil *(RM). We show that over a left bounded prime left Goldie ring, the study of Baer–McCoy radicals of general modules reduces to that of torsion modules. Moreover, over an FBN prime ring R with dim (R) ≤ 1 (or over a commutative domain R with dim (R) ≤ 1), every semiprime submodule of any module is an intersection of classical prime submodules.

Some results on ∗-differential identities in prime rings

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Kumar ◽  
Bharat Bhushan ◽  
Gurninder S. Sandhu
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Generalized Derivation ◽  
Additive Mapping ◽  
Generalized Derivations ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Differential Identities ◽  
Derivation Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a prime ring with involution ∗ of the second kind. An additive mapping [Formula: see text] is called generalized derivation if there exists a unique derivation [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] In this paper, we investigate the structure of [Formula: see text] and describe the possible forms of generalized derivations of [Formula: see text] that satisfy specific ∗-differential identities. Precisely, we study the following situations: (i) [Formula: see text] (ii) [Formula: see text] (iii) [Formula: see text] (iv) [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] Moreover, we construct some examples showing that the restrictions imposed in the hypotheses of our theorems are not redundant.

b-Generalized Derivations Acting on Multilinear Polynomials in Prime Rings

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 681-700
Author(s):  
Basudeb Dhara ◽  
Vincenzo De Filippis
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ring ◽  
Multilinear Polynomial ◽  
Extended Centroid ◽  
Generalized Derivations ◽  
Prime Rings ◽  
Ring Of Quotients ◽  
Multilinear Polynomials

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, Q be its maximal right ring of quotients, and C be its extended centroid. Suppose that [Formula: see text] is a non-central multilinear polynomial over C, [Formula: see text], and F, G are two b-generalized derivations of R. In this paper we describe all possible forms of F and G in the case [Formula: see text] for all [Formula: see text] in Rn.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document