Some results for the two disjoint connected dominating sets problem

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950065
Author(s):  
Xianliang Liu ◽  
Zishen Yang ◽  
Wei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Cubic Graph ◽  
Connected Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Dominating Set Problem

As a variant of minimum connected dominating set problem, two disjoint connected dominating sets (DCDS) problem is to ask whether there are two DCDS [Formula: see text] in a connected graph [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and if not, how to add an edge subset with minimum cardinality such that the new graph has a pair of DCDS. The two DCDS problem is so hard that it is NP-hard on trees. In this paper, if the vertex set [Formula: see text] of a connected graph [Formula: see text] can be partitioned into two DCDS of [Formula: see text], then it is called a DCDS graph. First, a necessary but not sufficient condition is proposed for cubic (3-regular) graph to be a DCDS graph. To be exact, if a cubic graph is a DCDS graph, there are at most four disjoint triangles in it. Next, if a connected graph [Formula: see text] is a DCDS graph, a simple but nontrivial upper bound [Formula: see text] of the girth [Formula: see text] is presented.

scholarly journals Claw-free graphs with equal 2-domination and domination numbers

Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2795-2801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Bert Randerath ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Line Graphs ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

For a graph G a subset D of the vertex set of G is a k-dominating set if every vertex not in D has at least k neighbors in D. The k-domination number k(G) is the minimum cardinality among the k-dominating sets of G. Note that the 1-domination number 1(G) is the usual domination number (G). Fink and Jacobson showed in 1985 that the inequality ?k(G)?(G)+k?2 is valid for every connected graph G. In this paper, we concentrate on the case k = 2, where k can be equal to ?, and we characterize all claw-free graphs and all line graphs G with ?(G) = ?2(G).

scholarly journals Bipartite graphs with close domination and k-domination numbers

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 873-885
Author(s):  
Gülnaz Boruzanlı Ekinci ◽  
Csilla Bujtás
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Bipartite Graphs ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient Condition ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
The Given

Abstract Let k be a positive integer and let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) . A subset D\subseteq V(G) is a k -dominating set if every vertex outside D is adjacent to at least k vertices in D . The k -domination number {\gamma }_{k}(G) is the minimum cardinality of a k -dominating set in G . For any graph G , we know that {\gamma }_{k}(G)\ge \gamma (G)+k-2 where \text{Δ}(G)\ge k\ge 2 and this bound is sharp for every k\ge 2 . In this paper, we characterize bipartite graphs satisfying the equality for k\ge 3 and present a necessary and sufficient condition for a bipartite graph to satisfy the equality hereditarily when k=3 . We also prove that the problem of deciding whether a graph satisfies the given equality is NP-hard in general.

scholarly journals Distance Domination and Distance Irredundance in Graphs

10.37236/953 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Hansberg ◽  
Dirk Meierling ◽  
Lutz Volkmann
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Distance Domination

A set $D\subseteq V$ of vertices is said to be a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set of $G$ if the distance between each vertex $u\in V-D$ and $D$ is at most $k$ (and $D$ induces a connected graph in $G$). The minimum cardinality of a (connected) distance $k$-dominating set in $G$ is the (connected) distance $k$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $\gamma_k(G)$ ($\gamma_k^c(G)$, respectively). The set $D$ is defined to be a total $k$-dominating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V$ is within distance $k$ from some vertex of $D$ other than itself. The minimum cardinality among all total $k$-dominating sets of $G$ is called the total $k$-domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $\gamma_k^t(G)$. For $x\in X\subseteq V$, if $N^k[x]-N^k[X-x]\neq\emptyset$, the vertex $x$ is said to be $k$-irredundant in $X$. A set $X$ containing only $k$-irredundant vertices is called $k$-irredundant. The $k$-irredundance number of $G$, denoted by $ir_k(G)$, is the minimum cardinality taken over all maximal $k$-irredundant sets of vertices of $G$. In this paper we establish lower bounds for the distance $k$-irredundance number of graphs and trees. More precisely, we prove that ${5k+1\over 2}ir_k(G)\geq \gamma_k^c(G)+2k$ for each connected graph $G$ and $(2k+1)ir_k(T)\geq\gamma_k^c(T)+2k\geq |V|+2k-kn_1(T)$ for each tree $T=(V,E)$ with $n_1(T)$ leaves. A class of examples shows that the latter bound is sharp. The second inequality generalizes a result of Meierling and Volkmann and Cyman, Lemańska and Raczek regarding $\gamma_k$ and the first generalizes a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $ir_1$. Furthermore, we shall show that $\gamma_k^c(G)\leq{3k+1\over2}\gamma_k^t(G)-2k$ for each connected graph $G$, thereby generalizing a result of Favaron and Kratsch regarding $k=1$.

The minimum eccentric distance sum of trees with given distance k-domination number

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidan Pei ◽  
Xiangfeng Pan
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Simple Connected Graph ◽  
Eccentric Distance ◽  
Distance Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a positive integer and [Formula: see text] be a simple connected graph. The eccentric distance sum of [Formula: see text] is defined as [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the maximum distance from [Formula: see text] to any other vertex and [Formula: see text] is the sum of all distances from [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is a distance [Formula: see text]-dominating set of [Formula: see text] if for every vertex [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] for some vertex [Formula: see text]. The minimum cardinality among all distance [Formula: see text]-dominating sets of [Formula: see text] is called the distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, the trees among all [Formula: see text]-vertex trees with distance [Formula: see text]-domination number [Formula: see text] having the minimal eccentric distance sum are determined.

On the minimum vertex covering transversal dominating sets in graphs and their classification

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750069 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasanthi ◽  
K. Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Covering ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Covering Set ◽  
Simple Connected Graph

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple and connected graph. A dominating set [Formula: see text] is said to be a vertex covering transversal dominating set if it intersects every minimum vertex covering set of [Formula: see text]. The vertex covering transversal domination number [Formula: see text] is the minimum cardinality among all vertex covering transversal dominating sets of [Formula: see text]. A vertex covering transversal dominating set of minimum cardinality [Formula: see text] is called a minimum vertex covering transversal dominating set or simply a [Formula: see text]-set. In this paper, we prove some general theorems on the vertex covering transversal domination number of a simple connected graph. We also provide some results about [Formula: see text]-sets and try to classify those sets based on their intersection with the minimum vertex covering sets.

scholarly journals Graphs with Constant Sum of Domination and Inverse Domination Numbers

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tamizh Chelvam ◽  
T. Asir
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Degree ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Complete Characterization ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Domination Numbers

A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G, is a dominating set if every vertex in V−D is adjacent to at least one vertex in D. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G. A subset of V−D, which is also a dominating set of G is called an inverse dominating set of G with respect to D. The inverse domination number γ′(G) is the minimum cardinality of the inverse dominating sets. Domke et al. (2004) characterized connected graphs G with γ(G)+γ′(G)=n, where n is the number of vertices in G. It is the purpose of this paper to give a complete characterization of graphs G with minimum degree at least two and γ(G)+γ′(G)=n−1.

New Self-Stabilizing Algorithms for Minimal Weakly Connected Dominating Sets

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 229-240
Author(s):  
Yihua Ding ◽  
James Z. Wang ◽  
Pradip K. Srimani
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Graph Algorithm ◽  
Connected Dominating Set ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Time And Space ◽  
Stabilization Time ◽  
Connected Dominating Sets ◽  
Space Requirement ◽  
Weakly Connected Dominating Set

In this paper, we propose two new self-stabilizing algorithms, MWCDS-C and MWCDS-D, for minimal weakly connected dominating sets in an arbitrary connected graph. Algorithm MWCDS-C stabilizes in O(n4) steps using an unfair central daemon and space requirement at each node is O(log n) bits at each node for an arbitrary connected graph with n nodes; it uses a designated node while other nodes are identical and anonymous. Algorithm MWCDS-D stabilizes using an unfair distributed daemon with identical time and space complexities, but it assumes unique node IDs. In the literature, the best reported stabilization time for a minimal weakly connected dominating set algorithm is O(nmA) under a distributed daemon [1], where m is the number of edges and A is the number of moves to construct a breadth-first tree.

scholarly journals Co-Secure Set Domination in Graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S5) ◽  
pp. 66-68
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Secure Set ◽  
Domination In Graphs

Throughout this paper, consider G = (V,E) as a connected graph. A subset D of V(G) is a set dominating set of G if for every M  V / D there exists a non-empty set N of D such that the induced sub graph <MUN> is connected. A subset D of the vertex set of a graph G is called a co-secure dominating set of a graph if D is a dominating set, and for each u' D there exists a vertex v'V / D such that u'v' is an edge and D \u'v' is a dominating set. A co-secure dominating set D is a co-secure set dominating set of G if D is also a set dominating set of G. The co-secure set domination number G s cs γ is the minimum cardinality of a co-secure set dominating set. In this paper we initiate the study of this new parameter & also determine the co-secure set domination number of some standard graphs and obtain its bounds.

scholarly journals The edge-to-edge geodetic domination number of a graph

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-658
Author(s):  
J. John ◽  
V. Sujin Flower
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Dominating Sets ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
General Properties ◽  
Geodetic Number ◽  
Geodetic Set ◽  
Positive Integers

Let G = (V, E) be a connected graph with at least three vertices. A set S ⊆ E(G) is called an edge-to-edge geodetic dominating set of G if S is both an edge-to-edge geodetic set of G and an edge dominating set of G. The edge-to-edge geodetic domination number γgee(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of its edge-to-edge geodetic dominating sets. Some general properties satisfied by this concept are studied. Connected graphs of size m with edge-to-edge geodetic domination number 2 or m or m − 1 are characterized. We proved that if G is a connected graph of size m ≥ 4 and Ḡ is also connected, then 4 ≤ γgee(G) + γgee(Ḡ) ≤ 2m − 2. Moreover we characterized graphs for which the lower and the upper bounds are sharp. It is shown that, for every pair of positive integers a, b with 2 ≤ a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with gee(G) = a and γgee(G) = b. Also it is shown that, for every pair of positive integers a and b with 2 < a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with γe(G) = a and γgee(G) = b, where γe(G) is the edge domination number of G and gee(G) is the edge-to-edge geodetic number of G.

Restrained geodetic domination in graphs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 2050084
Author(s):  
John Joy Mulloor ◽  
V. Sangeetha
Keyword(s):  
Connected Graph ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Cartesian Product ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Geodetic Set ◽  
Vertex Set ◽  
Isolated Vertex ◽  
Join Of Graphs ◽  
Domination In Graphs ◽  
Corona Product

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph with edge set [Formula: see text] and vertex set [Formula: see text]. For a connected graph [Formula: see text], a vertex set [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is said to be a geodetic set if every vertex in [Formula: see text] lies in a shortest path between any pair of vertices in [Formula: see text]. If the geodetic set [Formula: see text] is dominating, then [Formula: see text] is geodetic dominating set. A vertex set [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is said to be a restrained geodetic dominating set if [Formula: see text] is geodetic, dominating and the subgraph induced by [Formula: see text] has no isolated vertex. The minimum cardinality of such set is called restrained geodetic domination (rgd) number. In this paper, rgd number of certain classes of graphs and 2-self-centered graphs was discussed. The restrained geodetic domination is discussed in graph operations such as Cartesian product and join of graphs. Restrained geodetic domination in corona product between a general connected graph and some classes of graphs is also discussed in this paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document