scholarly journals Instantaneous Order Impact and High-Frequency Strategy Optimization in Limit Order Books

2017 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Gonzalez ◽  
Mark Schervish

We propose a limit order book (LOB) model with dynamics that account for both the impact of the most recent order and volume imbalance. To model these effects jointly we introduce a discrete Markov chain model. We then find the policy for optimal order choice and control. The optimal policy derived uses limit orders, cancellations and market orders. It looks to avoid non-execution and adverse selection risk simultaneously. Using ultra high-frequency data from the NASDAQ stock exchange we compare our policy with other submission strategies that use a subset of all available order types and show that ours significantly outperforms.

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 1750007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Frey ◽  
Patrik Sandås

We examine the impact of iceberg orders on the price and order flow dynamics in limit order books. Iceberg orders allow traders to simultaneously hide a large portion of their order size and signal their interest in trading to the market. We show that when market participants detect iceberg orders they tend to strongly respond by submitting matching market orders consistent with iceberg orders facilitating the search for latent liquidity. The greater the fraction of an iceberg order that is executed, the smaller is its price impact consistent with liquidity rather than informed trading. The presence of iceberg orders is associated with increased trading consistent with a positive liquidity externality, but the reduced order book transparency associated with iceberg orders also creates an adverse selection cost for limit orders that may partly offset any gains.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devlina Chatterjee ◽  
Chiranjit Mukhopadhyay

In an electronic stock market, an equity trader can submit two kinds of orders: a market order or a limit order. In a market order, the trade occurs at the best available price on the opposite side of the book. In a limit order, on the other hand, the trader specifies a price (lower limit in case of sell orders and higher limit in case of buy orders) beyond which they are not willing to transact. Limit orders supply liquidity to the market and aid in price discovery since they indicate the prices that traders are willing to pay at any point of time. One of the risks that a trader placing a limit order faces is the risk of delayed execution or non-execution. If the execution is delayed, then the trader also faces a “picking-off” risk, in the event of the arrival of new information. With these issues in the background, a trader placing a limit order at a certain price, given various economic variables such as recent price movements as well as characteristics of the company in question, is interested in the probability of execution of the order as a function of subsequent elapsed time. For example, if she places a small sell order at 0.5 percent above the last traded price for a given stock, what is the probability that the order will be executed in the next t minutes? With this motivation, this paper considers execution times of small limit orders in an electronic exchange, specifically the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India. Order execution times have been studied in several other works, where they are modeled by reconstructing the history of the order book using high-frequency data. Here, for the first time, the much simpler approach of small hypothetical orders placed at certain prices at certain points of time has been used. Given that an order has been placed at a certain price, subsequent price movements determine the lower and upper bounds of the time to execution based on when (and if) the order price is first reached and when it is first crossed. Survival analysis with interval censoring is used to model the execution probability of an order as a function of time. Several Accelerated Failure Time models are built with historical trades and order book data for 50 stocks over 63 trading days. Additionally, choice of distributions, relative importance of covariates, and model reduction are discussed; and results qualitatively consistent with studies that did not use hypothetical orders are obtained. Interestingly, for the data, the differences between the above-mentioned bounds are not very large. Directly using them without interval censoring gives survival curves that bracket the correct curve obtained with interval censoring. The paper concludes that this approach, though data- and computation-wise much less intensive than traditional approaches, nevertheless yields useful insights on execution probabilities of small limit orders in electronic exchanges.


2016 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 1650004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lakner ◽  
Josh Reed ◽  
Sasha Stoikov

We study the one-sided limit order book corresponding to limit sell orders and model it as a measure-valued process. Limit orders arrive to the book according to a Poisson process and are placed on the book according to a distribution which varies depending on the current best price. Market orders to buy periodically arrive to the book according to a second, independent Poisson process and remove from the book the order corresponding to the current best price. We consider the above described limit order book in a high frequency regime in which the rate of incoming limit and market orders is large and traders place their limit sell orders close to the current best price. Our first set of results provide weak limits for the unscaled price process and the properly scaled measure-valued limit order book process in the high frequency regime. In particular, we characterize the limiting measure-valued limit order book process as the solution to a measure-valued stochastic differential equation. We then provide an analysis of both the transient and long-run behavior of the limiting limit order book process.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jusselin Paul ◽  
Mastrolia Thibaut ◽  
Rosenbaum Mathieu

Optimal Auction Duration in Financial Markets In the considered auction market, market makers fill the order book during a given time period while some other investors send market orders. The clearing price is set to maximize the exchanged volume at the clearing time according to the supply and demand of each market participant. The error made between this clearing price and the efficient price is derived as a function of the auction duration. We study the impact of the behavior of market takers on this error to minimize their transaction costs. We compute the optimal duration of the auctions for 77 stocks traded on Euronext and compare the quality of the price formation process under this optimal value to the case of a continuous limit order book. Continuous limit order books are usually found to be suboptimal. Order of magnitude of optimal auction durations is from 2–10 minutes.


2004 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 191-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Li Liang ◽  
Ching-Hai Jiang ◽  
Yen-Sheng Huang

This paper examines the performance of limit orders versus market orders using intraday transaction prices for all stocks listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange over the first three months of 1999. The results indicate that executed limit orders significantly outperform market orders. Moreover, even after including the impact of unfilled limit orders, the unconditional limit orders still perform slightly better than the corresponding market orders. The superior performance of limit orders is consistent with the explanation that limit order traders benefit from the bid-ask bounce driven by liquidity trading in the Taiwan stock market. By replacing the buy and sell prices by the bid-ask average, the superior profitability of limit orders decline significantly.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-233
Author(s):  
Cheng-Yi Chien ◽  
Tzu-Hsiang Liao ◽  
Hsiu-Chuan Lee

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the impact of a reduction in tick size on the information content of the order book by using data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE). Design/methodology/approach – To estimate the information content of the order book, the modified information share proposed by Hasbrouck and extended by Lien and Shrestha is used in this paper. Findings – The empirical results show that the limit order book is informative. Furthermore, the results indicate that a reduction in tick size will decrease the information content of the order book and the decrease in the information content of the order book is positively related to the thinner order book. Originality/value – This paper suggests that, in order to enhance the information content of the order book, the TWSE should disclose the full limit order book.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenta Yamada ◽  
Takayuki Mizuno

We analyzed the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) for a 29-month period from August 2014 to December 2016, including every transaction and order book snapshot, and confirmed through a simple statistical test that the market impact depends on each stock. Based on a correlation analysis, we found that the market impact slowly changes over time. From an order book analysis, negative correlations were found between the market impact and the averaged limit order volumes in the order book. We also clarified that one of the factors of market impact is the volume of limit orders in the order book.


Author(s):  
Matteo Aquilina ◽  
Eric Budish ◽  
Peter O’Neill

Abstract We use stock exchange message data to quantify the negative aspect of high-frequency trading, known as “latency arbitrage.” The key difference between message data and widely familiar limit order book data is that message data contain attempts to trade or cancel that fail. This allows the researcher to observe both winners and losers in a race, whereas in limit order book data you cannot see the losers, so you cannot directly see the races. We find that latency arbitrage races are very frequent (about one per minute per symbol for FTSE 100 stocks), extremely fast (the modal race lasts 5–10 millionths of a second), and account for a remarkably large portion of overall trading volume (about 20%). Race participation is concentrated, with the top six firms accounting for over 80% of all race wins and losses. The average race is worth just a small amount (about half a price tick), but because of the large volumes the stakes add up. Our main estimates suggest that races constitute roughly one-third of price impact and the effective spread (key microstructure measures of the cost of liquidity), that latency arbitrage imposes a roughly 0.5 basis point tax on trading, that market designs that eliminate latency arbitrage would reduce the market’s cost of liquidity by 17%, and that the total sums at stake are on the order of $5 billion per year in global equity markets alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document