scholarly journals On the Binding Energies of Very Light Nuclei

1955 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 490-492
Author(s):  
Shôta Suekane ◽  
Wataro Watari
2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S268) ◽  
pp. 469-471
Author(s):  
Hubert Reeves

AbstractMy aim is to show how the abundance ratios of the light elements (6 to 11) are related to the properties of the strong nuclear interaction and, in particular, to the major influence of closed shells of neutrons and protons, (the magic numbers : 2, 8, etc) on the binding energies of the nuclei.


1965 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1248-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gilbert ◽  
F. S. Chen ◽  
A. G. W. Cameron

There has been discussion in the literature as to whether the cumulative number of levels in light nuclei varies more nearly as exp(const. [Formula: see text]) or exp(const. E), where E is the excitation energy. The question is examined in this paper. It is found that if one constructs "step diagrams" by plotting the cumulative number versus the energy, both formulas represent the data almost equally well. However, additional consideration of levels counted above neutron and proton binding energies shows that exp(const. [Formula: see text]) fails badly to represent the data, whereas exp(const. E) continues to give good fits. In either case E may be measured above an arbitrary ground-state energy E0. If the satisfactory formula is written in the form exp(E–E0)/T, then it is found that the dependence of the slope on mass number may be expressed in approximately the form T−1 = 0.0165A MeV−1, but there are significant deviations from this relation apparently related to shell structure. The intercepts E0 are quite variable but are roughly clustered according to the oddness or evenness of the neutron and proton numbers of the nucleus.


1951 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 663-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyumpei Sanada ◽  
Yasukazu Yoshizawa

The discovery of the light nuclei n 0 1 H 1 2 H 1 3 He 2 3 has provided additional and much-needed material on which to base and test any theory of the structure and interaction on nuclear particles. The properties of these nuclei which are best known are their masses, the latest values of which are the following: n 0 1 1·0083 H 1 2 2·0142 H 1 3 3·0161 He 2 3 3·0172, assuming the validity of the mass scheme proposed independently by Oliphant, Kempton, and Rutherford, and by Bethe (in which the results of the disintegration experiments are found to be consistent if the He 4 :O 16 ration is taken as 4·0034 :16). From these masses the binding energies of the nuclei, considered as combinations of neutrons and protons, may be obtained. We find, then, that H 1 2 = H 1 1 + n 0 1 - 2·1 x 10 6 e -volts, H 1 3 = H 1 1 + 2 n 0 1 - 8·1 x 10 6 e -volts, He 2 3 = 2H 1 1 + n 0 1 - 6·9 x 10 6 e -volts. The most conspicuous feature of these figures is that the binding energy of both H 1 3 and He 2 3 is considerably greater than twice of H 1 2 , and the question arises as to whether this cab be explained without introducing an attractive force between the neutrons in H 1 3 and between the protons in He 2 3 . In this paper we attempt to answer the question by applying the variation method to calculate the binding energies of H 1 3 and He 2 3 , use being made of all available information bearing on the form of the neutron-porton interaction. It is found that definite results cannot be obtained in this direction, but the calculations would seem to indicate that these additional attractive forces must be introduced, and, in any case, upper limits may be found for their magnitude. Before discussing these calculations it is important to examine the velocity of the variation method as applies to H 1 2 by comparing results obtained by its use with exact solutions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (06) ◽  
pp. 1950039
Author(s):  
K. Wang ◽  
A. Bonasera ◽  
H. Zheng ◽  
G. Q. Zhang ◽  
Y. G. Ma ◽  
...  

We implement the Heisenberg principle into the Constrained Molecular Dynamics model with a similar approach to the Pauli principle using the one-body occupation probability [Formula: see text]. Results of the modified and the original model with comparisons to data are given. The binding energies and the radii of light nuclei obtained with the modified model are more consistent with the experimental data than the original one. The collision term and the density distribution are tested through a comparison to p+[Formula: see text]C elastic scattering data. Some simulations for fragmentation and superheavy nuclei production are also discussed.


The possibility of discussing nuclear structure in terms of neutrons and protons, and so avoiding the awkward difficulties associated with the behavioiur of electrons under nuclear conditions, has greatly stimulated interest in the binding energies of nuclei. Investigation of these energies leads to information about the nature an magnitude of the interactions between neutrons and protons. In a pervious paper, referred to henceforth as Paper I, we considered the binding energies of the nuclei composed of three particles ("ternary" nuclei) He 3 and H 3 . Assuming that the binding forces were of a two-body nature and taking simple short range potential functions to represent the interaction energies which were consistent with the observed mass of H 2 , the variation method was applied to determine the parameters in these potential functions. It was shown that it is improbable that the observed masses of the "ternary" nuclei could be explained without introducing attractive forces between like particles. Since then a more exact variational treatment, due to Thomas, has shown that these conclusions must be modified if the range of interaction between neutron and proton is less than 10 -13 cm. In such circumstances Thomas proved that the binding energies of the ternary nuclei would be greater than the observed, unless repulsions between like particles are included. For greater ranges of interaction the conclusions of Paper I are unaffected; namely, that for ranges of interaction less than 3 X 10- 13 cm the interaction between like particles is less than that between unlike, provided the range of interaction is substantially the same in both cases. The results may be summarized as follows: ( a ) For ranges of the two-body forces less than 10 -13 cm repulsive forces between like particles must exist.


The static interaction of the Møller-Rosenfeld theory is used to calculate approximately the binding energies of the nuclei H 2 , H 3 , He 3 and He 4 . The value of the meson mass and of the two other parameters available in the theory are determined from a comparison with the observed binding energies of the H 3 nucleus and of the singlet and triplet states of the deuteron. The meson mass so determined is between 210 and 220 electron masses which is in fair agreement with cosmic-ray measurements. The binding energy of He 3 calculated from the energy difference H 3 – He 3 is also found to be in fair agreement with the observed value. The theoretical binding energy of He 4 is less than half the observed value, and it is suggested that in this nucleus there exists an additional many-body interaction.


The theory of the scattering of neutrons by deuterons has been worked out for neutrons with energy in the range 0-11.5 MV. It is assumed that the interaction energy of all fundamental particles is the same, and calculations have been carried out assuming three types of such interaction—an ordinary unsaturated force, an exchange force of Majorana-Heisenberg type, and a ‘mixed’ exchange force involved all exchange operators. The space-dependent part of the interaction is taken to be of the form Ae -2 r/a , with the constants A and a as determined by Present and Rarita from a study of the binding energies and collision properties of the light nuclei. To obtain differential equations for the functions describing the relative motion of neutron and deuteron Wheeler’s method of resonating group structure was employed. The resulting integro-differential equations, which include exchange of particles as well as exchange forces, were solved numerically. An exact solution of the deuteron internal wave equation for the exponential interaction was used throughout. Results for the total elastic cross-section, calculated with exchange forces, agree well with the observed values, but ordinary forces give, for 2.2 MV neutrons, a cross-section 1.5 times too large. The calculated angular distribution, in relative co-ordinates, is very much more uniform for exchange forces than for ordinary forces. For 2.2 MV neutrons this difference is so marked as to be easily detectable by experiment, and it is deduced that the measurements by Barschall and Kanner of the angular distribution for such neutrons are compatible only with the assumption of exchange forces. It is pointed out that the result that ordinary forces lead to a much less uniform angular distribution is likely to be a general one, independent of the detailed accuracy of the theory.


1970 ◽  
Vol 28 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Angeli ◽  
J. Csikai ◽  
I. Hunyadi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document