Validation of seismic data processing and interpretation with integration of gravity and magnetic data

1996 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Horscroft ◽  
J. E. Bain
2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 746
Author(s):  
Irina Borissova ◽  
Gabriel Nelson

In 2008–9, under the Offshore Energy Security Program, Geoscience Australia (GA) acquired 650 km of seismic data, more than 3,000 km of gravity and magnetic data, and, dredge samples in the southern Carnarvon Basin. This area comprises the Paleozoic Bernier Platform and southern part of the Mesozoic Exmouth Sub-basin. The new seismic and potential field data provide a new insight into the structure and sediment thickness of the deepwater southernmost part of the Exmouth Sub-basin. Mesozoic depocentres correspond to a linear gravity low, in water depths between 1,000–2,000 m and contain between 2–3 sec (TWT) of sediments. They form a string of en-echelon northeast-southwest oriented depressions bounded by shallow-dipping faults. Seismic data indicates that these depocentres extend south to at least 24°S, where they become more shallow and overprinted by volcanics. Potential plays in this part of the Exmouth Sub-basin may include fluvio-deltaic Triassic sandstone and Lower–Middle Jurassic claystone source rocks sealed by the regional Early Cretaceous Muderong shale. On the adjoining Bernier Platform, minor oil shows in the Silurian and Devonian intervals at Pendock–1a indicate the presence of a Paleozoic petroleum system. Ordovician fluvio-deltaic sandstones sealed by the Silurian age marine shales, Devonian reef complexes and Miocene inversion anticlines are identified as potential plays. Long-distance migration may contribute to the formation of additional plays close to the boundary between the two provinces. With a range of both Mesozoic and Paleozoic plays, this under-explored region may have a significant hydrocarbon potential.


Geophysics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 1693-1705
Author(s):  
Alan O. Ramo ◽  
James W. Bradley

Spatially discontinuous high‐amplitude seismic reflections were encountered in seismic data acquired in the early 1970s in northeast Louisiana and southwest Arkansas. Large acoustic impedance contrasts are known to result from gaseous hydrocarbon accumulations. However, amplitude anomalies may also result from large density and velocity contrasts which are geologically unrelated to hydrocarbon entrapment. A well drilled on the northeast Louisiana amplitude anomaly encountered 300 ft of rhyolite at a depth of 6170 ft. Subsequent gravity and total field magnetic profiles across the feature revealed the presence of 0.2 mgal and 17 gamma anomalies, respectively. The measured magnetic susceptibility of the rhyolite was 0.0035 emu and the measured density contrast was [Formula: see text]. Model studies based on the seismically determined areal extent of the anomaly and the measured thickness of rhyolite accounted for the observed gravity and magnetic anomalies. The southwest Arkansas amplitude anomaly was a sheet‐like reflection which terminated to the north and west within the survey area. Two north‐south gravity profiles exhibited a negative character over the sheet‐like reflector but did not exhibit a clear spatial correlation with the north limit of the seismic anomaly. Two north‐south magnetic profiles exhibited tenuous 4 gamma anomalies which appeared to be spatially correlated with the interpreted north edge of the seismic anomaly. A subsequent wildcat well encountered no igneous material but did penetrate 200 ft of salt at about 7500 ft. Reassessment of the gravity and magnetic data indicated that this seismic amplitude anomaly is not attributable to an intrasedimentary igneous source; it suggested a salt‐related 0.2 to 0.3 mgal minimum coextensive with the observed seismic amplitude anomaly. Present amplitude analysis technology would treat these seismic data with suspicion. However, gravity and magnetic data acquisition can provide a relatively inexpensive means for evaluation and verification of amplitude anomalies and thus should be an adjunct for land seismic exploration utilizing amplitude analysis.


1983 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
H.C Larsen

During August and September 1982 a marine geophysical survey was conducted on the East Greenland Shelf. The survey was part of the ongoing regional project NAD (Larsen & Andersen, 1982; Andersen et al., 1981; Risum, 1980; Larsen & Thorning, 1980). In all 2794 km of 30-fold multi-channel seismic data and marine gravity and magnetic data were acquired (fig. 33). The object of the NAD programme is to acquire regional coverage of aeromagnetic, multichannel seismic refiection, seismic refraction (sonobuoy), marine gravity and magnetic data of the East Greenland Shelf between latitudes 60° N and 78°N. Aeromagnetic data comprising 63000 line kilometres were acquired in 1979 (Larsen & Thorning, 1980) and 5000 km of marine geophysical data were acquired in 1980 and 1981 (Larsen & Andersen, 1982; Andersen et al., 1981). This year the final data for the project were collected. Thus, a total of 7800 km of multi-channel refiection seismic data and 50 sonobuoy refraction seismic profiles of 20 to 70 km length have been acquired (fig. 33). In addition, marine gravity and magnetics were run at most lines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saâd Soulaimani ◽  
Saïd Chakiri ◽  
Ahmed Manar ◽  
Ayoub Soulaimani ◽  
Abdelhalim Miftah ◽  
...  

1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
E.R. Crain

The application of high speed computer processing and computer graphics is reviewed and discussed in relation to manipulating and present geophysical, and geological mapping data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-210
Author(s):  
Wiji Raharjo ◽  
Indiati Retno Palupi ◽  
Oktavia Dewi Alfiani

Separation between Regional and Residual anomaly in Gravity and Magnetic data processing is very important to get the best result in geological interpretation. Several method were used to solve this problem like upward continuation and polynomial fitting. With the same principle, 2D FFT is applied by make an interactive tools based on Matlab Language Programming, named “Oasis Ala-Ala”. It adopt the algorithm from software Oasis. It started with make visualization map or the original data, then the map divide into some grids. Each of grid contain gravity or magnetic data. Then it transformed from special to wavenumber domain. After that, it convolve with our own filter matrix. And the last step is inverse it to get the regional and residual anomaly map. However, Matlab is powerful in facilitate this process in the GUI Toolbox. One important thing is the size of gravity and magnetic data. It will improve to Filter matrix size before do inverse process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document