This opinion paper discusses how human–robot interaction (HRI) methodologies can be robustly developed by drawing on insights from fields outside of HRI that explore human–other interactions. The paper presents a framework that draws parallels between HRIs, and human–human, human–animal and human–object interaction literature, by considering the morphology and use of a robot to aid the development of robust HRI methodologies. The paper then briefly presents some novel empirical work as proof of concept to exemplify how the framework can help researchers define the mechanism of effect taking place within specific HRIs. The empirical work draws on known mechanisms of effect in animal-assisted therapy, and behavioural observations of touch patterns and their relation to individual differences in caring and attachment styles, and details how this trans-disciplinary approach to HRI methodology development was used to explore how an interaction with an animal-like robot was impacting a user. In doing so, this opinion piece outlines how useful objective, psychological measures of social cognition can be for deepening our understanding of HRI, and developing richer HRI methodologies, which take us away from questions that simply ask ‘Is this a good robot?’, and closer towards questions that ask ‘What mechanism of effect is occurring here, through which effective HRI is being performed?’ This paper further proposes that in using trans-disciplinary methodologies, experimental HRI can also be used to study human social cognition in and of itself.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human–robot interaction’.
Drawing parallels in human–other interactions: a trans-disciplinary approach to developing human–robot interaction methodologies
