A Latent Space Modeling Approach to Interfirm Relationship Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
Ka Chung Ng ◽  
Mike K. P. So ◽  
Kar Yan Tam

Interfirm relationships are crucial to our understanding of firms’ collective and interactive behavior. Many information systems-related phenomena, including the diffusion of innovations, standard alliances, technology collaboration, and outsourcing, involve a multitude of relationships between firms. This study proposes a latent space approach to model temporal change in a dual-view interfirm network. We assume that interfirm relationships depend on an underlying latent space; firms that are close to each other in the latent space are more likely to develop a relationship. We construct the latent space by embedding two dynamic networks of firms in an integrated manner, resulting in a more comprehensive view of an interfirm relationship. We validate our approach by introducing three business measures derived from the latent space model to study alliance formation and stock comovement. We illustrate how the trajectories of firms provide insights into alliance activities. We also show that our proposed measures have strong predictive power on stock comovement. We believe the proposed approach enriches the methodology toolbox of IS researchers in studying interfirm relationships.

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel K. Sewell ◽  
Yuguo Chen

Author(s):  
Florent Monay ◽  
Pedro Quelhas ◽  
Daniel Gatica-Perez ◽  
Jean-Marc Odobez

Psychometrika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyan Liu ◽  
Ick Hoon Jin ◽  
Zhiyong Zhang ◽  
Ying Yuan

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1454-1459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley C. Wallet ◽  
Marcilio C. de Matos ◽  
J. Timothy Kwiatkowski ◽  
Yoscel Suarez

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Kalah Gade ◽  
Mohammed M Hafez ◽  
Michael Gabbay

Violent conflict among rebels is a common feature of civil wars and insurgencies. Yet, not all rebel groups are equally prone to such infighting. While previous research has focused on the systemic causes of violent conflict within rebel movements, this article explores the factors that affect the risk of conflict between pairs of rebel groups. We generate hypotheses concerning how differences in power, ideology, and state sponsors between rebel groups impact their propensity to clash and test them using data from the Syrian civil war. The data, drawn from hundreds of infighting claims made by rebel groups on social media, are used to construct a network of conflictual ties among 30 rebel groups. The relationship between the observed network structure and the independent variables is evaluated using network analysis metrics and methods including assortativity, community structure, simulation, and latent space modeling. We find strong evidence that ideologically distant groups have a higher propensity for infighting than ideologically proximate ones. We also find support for power asymmetry, meaning that pairs of groups of disparate size are at greater risk of infighting than pairs of equal strength. No support was found for the proposition that sharing state sponsors mitigates rebels’ propensity for infighting. Our results provide an important corrective to prevailing theory, which discounts the role of ideology in militant factional dynamics within fragmented conflicts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel K. Sewell ◽  
Yuguo Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document