Historical development of radiation safety practices in radiology.

Radiographics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1267-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Brodsky ◽  
R L Kathren
2021 ◽  
Vol 259 (8) ◽  
pp. 919-926
Author(s):  
Alexandra F. Belotta ◽  
Monique N. Mayer ◽  
Niels K. Koehncke ◽  
James Carmalt ◽  
Fernando P. Freitas ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. rapm-2020-102002
Author(s):  
David Anthony Provenzano ◽  
Samuel Ambrose Florentino ◽  
Jason S Kilgore ◽  
Jose De Andres ◽  
B Todd Sitzman ◽  
...  

IntroductionInterventional pain procedures have increased in complexity, often requiring longer radiation exposure times and subsequently higher doses. The practicing physician requires an in-depth knowledge and evidence-based knowledge of radiation safety to limit the health risks to themselves, patients and healthcare staff. The objective of this study was to examine current radiation safety practices and knowledge among interventional pain physicians and compare them to evidence-based recommendations.Materials and methodsA 49-question survey was developed based on an extensive review of national and international guidelines on radiation safety. The survey was web-based and distributed through the following professional organizations: Association of Pain Program Directors, American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, European Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy, International Neuromodulation Society, and North American Neuromodulation Society. Responses to radiation safety practices and knowledge questions were evaluated and compared with evidence-based recommendations. An exploratory data analysis examined associations with radiation safety training/education, geographical location, practice type, self-perceived understanding, and fellowship experience.ResultsOf 708 responding physicians, 93% reported concern over the health effects of radiation, while only 63% had ever received radiation safety training/education. Overall, ≥80% physician compliance with evidence-based radiation safety practice recommendations was demonstrated for only 2/15 survey questions. Physician knowledge of radiation safety principles was low, with 0/10 survey questions having correct response rates ≥80%.ConclusionWe have identified deficiencies in the implementation of evidence-based practices and knowledge gaps in radiation safety. Further education and training are warranted for both fellowship training and postgraduate medical practice. The substantial gaps identified should be addressed to better protect physicians, staff and patients from unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional pain procedures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e000128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyantha Edison ◽  
Pi Sun Chang ◽  
Guan Hong Toh ◽  
Li Na Lee ◽  
Sarat Kumar Sanamandra ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam E. Van Dyke ◽  
Vladimir Drozdovitch ◽  
Michele M. Doody ◽  
Hyeyeun Lim ◽  
Norman E. Bolus ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. e38-e39
Author(s):  
Collins Melissa ◽  
Corridon Emily ◽  
Reene Samantha

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1014-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie H Chen ◽  
Marie-Christine Brunet

BackgroundThe prevalence of women physicians is steadily rising, but the field of neurointervention remains one of the most male-dominated subspecialties in medicine. A fear of radiation exposure, particularly during pregnancy and childbearing years, may be responsible for deterring some of the best and brightest. This is the first study to examine the amount of maternal and fetal radiation exposure during a pregnant neurointerventional fellow’s training.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the radiation exposure of a neurointerventional fellow prior to and during pregnancy from February 2018 to May 2019 in 758 neurointerventional cases. The collar dosimeter was used to measure overall maternal exposure and an additional fetal dosimeter was worn under two lead apron skirts to estimate fetal radiation exposure.ResultsThere was not a significant difference between pre- and post-pregnancy overall maternal radiation exposure as measured by the collar dosimeter (151 mrem pre-pregnancy and 105 mrem during pregnancy, p=0.129). Mean fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopy emission per procedure also did not differ prior to and during pregnancy. Fetal radiation exposure measurements from both the Mirion Genesis Ultra TLD dosimeter as well as the Mirion Instadose dosimeters worn under double lead apron skirts were 0 mrem for all 6 months.ConclusionThese findings suggest that, when optimal radiation safety practices are implemented, the fetal dose of a pregnant neurointerventionalist is negligible. Further studies and education are necessary to encourage women to choose neurointervention and allow practicing women neurointerventionalists to maintain their productivity during their reproductive years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document