Case Studies in Physiology: Cardiovascular function during triplet pregnancy

Author(s):  
Victoria L. Meah ◽  
Rshmi Khurana ◽  
Lisa K. Hornberger ◽  
Craig D. Steinback ◽  
Margie H. Davenport

Pregnancy is recognized as a natural physiological stressor to the maternal cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular adaptation is markedly greater in twin compared to singleton pregnancy; however, these changes are sparsely documented in triplet pregnancy. The aim of this case series was to compare maternal cardiac function, cardioautonomic regulation and blood pressure reactivity in healthy singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies. Resting cardiac structure and function (echocardiography), beat-by-beat blood pressure variability (BPV; photoplethysmography) and heart rate variability (HRV; electrocardiogram) were measured in two triplet, three twin and three singleton pregnancies (matched for maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age). Hemodynamic responses to a 3-minute cold pressor test were also recorded to assess blood pressure reactivity. Due to the small sample size of this case series, statistical comparisons were not made between groups. Compared to singleton and twin pregnancies, individuals pregnant with triplets had greater resting cardiac output but lower cardiac deformation (longitudinal strain, basal circumferential strain, and torsion), sympathetic dominance in cardioautonomic regulation (lower HRV and higher BPV) and elevated blood pressure reactivity in response to the cold pressor test. Taken together, these observations suggest that females with triplet pregnancies may have reduced cardiovascular function, which may contribute to the heightened risk of complications in multifetal pregnancies.

1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Peckerman ◽  
Patrice G. Saab ◽  
Philip M. McCabe ◽  
Jay S. Skyler ◽  
Ray W. Winters ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Ronald K. McMillan ◽  
Matthew C. Babcock ◽  
Kamila U. Migdal ◽  
Austin T. Robinson ◽  
Joseph C. Watso ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1347-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Dongfeng Gu ◽  
Fanghong Lu ◽  
Jianjun Mu ◽  
Xushan Wang ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Parati ◽  
Guido Pomidossi ◽  
Agustin Ramirez ◽  
Bruno Cesana ◽  
Giuseppe Mancia

1. In man evaluation of neural cardiovascular regulation makes use of a variety of tests which address the excitatory and reflex inhibitory neural influences that control circulation. Because interpretation of these tests is largely based on the magnitude of the elicited haemodynamic responses, their reproducibility in any given subject is critical. 2. In 39 subjects with continuous blood pressure (intra-arterial catheter) and heart rate monitoring we measured (i) the blood pressure and heart rate rises during hand-grip and cold-pressor test, (ii) the heart rate changes occurring during baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation by injection of phenylephrine and trinitroglycerine, and (iii) the heart rate and blood pressure changes occurring with alteration in carotid baroreceptor activity by a neck chamber. Each test was carefully standardized and performed at 30 min intervals for a total of six times in each subject. 3. The results showed that the responses to any test were clearly different from one another and that this occurred in all subjects studied. For the group as a whole the average response variability (coefficient of variation) ranged from 10.2% for the blood pressure response to carotid baroreceptor stimulation to 44.2% for the heart rate response to cold-pressor test. The variability of the responses was not related to basal blood pressure or heart rate, nor to the temporal sequence of the test performance. 4. Thus tests employed for studying neural cardiovascular control in man produce responses whose reproducibility is limited. This phenomenon may make it more difficult to define the response magnitude typical of each subject, as well as its comparison in different conditions and diseases.


JAMA ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 183 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul H. Barnett ◽  
Edgar A. Hines ◽  
Alexander Schirger ◽  
Robert P. Gage

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document