Diencephalic Locomotor Region in the Lamprey—Afferents and Efferent Control

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1343-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariane Ménard ◽  
Sten Grillner
Keyword(s):  
Basal Ganglia ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Ventral Root ◽  
The Body ◽  
Tonic Inhibition ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Spinal Level ◽  
Double Labeling ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Stimulation Of

In vertebrates, locomotion can be initiated by stimulation of the diencephalic locomotor region (DLR). Little is known of the different forebrain regions that provide input to the neurons in DLR. In the lamprey, it had been shown previously that DLR provides monosynaptic input to reticulospinal neurons, which in turn elicit rhythmic ventral root activity at the spinal level. To show that actual locomotor movements are produced from DLR, we use a semi-intact preparation in which the brain stem is exposed and the head fixed, while the body is left to generate actual swimming movements. DLR stimulation induced symmetric locomotor movements with an undulatory wave transmitted along the body. To explore if DLR is under tonic GABAergic input under resting conditions, as in mammals, GABAergic antagonists and agonists were locally administered into DLR. Injections of GABA agonists inhibited locomotion, whereas GABA antagonists facilitated the induction of locomotion. These findings suggest that GABAergic projections provide tonic inhibition that once turned off can release locomotion. Double-labeling experiments were carried out to identify GABAergic projections to the DLR. Populations of GABAergic projection neurons to DLR originated in the caudoventral portion of the medial pallium, the lateral and dorsal pallium, and the striatal area. These different GABAergic projection neurons, which also project to other brain stem motor centers, may represent the basal ganglia output to DLR. Moreover, electrical stimulation of striatum induced long-lasting plateau potentials in reticulospinal cells and associated locomotor episodes dependent on DLR being intact, suggesting that striatum may act via the basal ganglia output identified here.

scholarly journals Muscular Movements in Man, and their Evolution in the Infant: a Study of Movement in Man, and its Evolution, together with Inferences as to the Properties of Nerve-Centres and their Modes of Action in expressing Thought

1889 ◽  
Vol 35 (149) ◽  
pp. 23-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Warner
Keyword(s):  
Brain Area ◽  
Muscular Contraction ◽  
The Body ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Modes Of Action ◽  
Central Nerve System ◽  
Nerve System ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Compound Series ◽  
Stimulation Of

(1) Movement in mau has long been a subject of profitable study. Visible movement in the body is produced by muscular contraction following upon stimulation of the muscles by efferent currents passing from the central nerve-system. Modern physiological experiments have demonstrated that when a special brain-area discharges nerve-currents, these are followed by certain visible movements or contraction of certain muscles corresponding. So exact are such reactions, as obtained by experiment upon the brain-areas, that movements similar to those produced by experimental excitation of a certain brain-area may be taken as evidence of action in that area, or as commencing in discharge from that area (see Reinforcement of Movements, 35; Compound Series of Movements, 34).

Symptoms, Related Brain Regions, and Diagnosis

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Eric Ahlskog
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Basal Ganglia ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Electrical Signal ◽  
Brain And Spinal Cord ◽  
The Brain

As a prelude to the treatment chapters that follow, we need to define and describe the types of problems and symptoms encountered in DLB and PDD. The clinical picture can be quite varied: problems encountered by one person may be quite different from those encountered by another person, and symptoms that are problematic in one individual may be minimal in another. In these disorders, the Lewy neurodegenerative process potentially affects certain nervous system regions but spares others. Affected areas include thinking and memory circuits, as well as movement (motor) function and the autonomic nervous system, which regulates primary functions such as bladder, bowel, and blood pressure control. Many other brain regions, by contrast, are spared or minimally involved, such as vision and sensation. The brain and spinal cord constitute the central nervous system. The interface between the brain and spinal cord is by way of the brain stem, as shown in Figure 4.1. Thought, memory, and reasoning are primarily organized in the thick layers of cortex overlying lower brain levels. Volitional movements, such as writing, throwing, or kicking, also emanate from the cortex and integrate with circuits just below, including those in the basal ganglia, shown in Figure 4.2. The basal ganglia includes the striatum, globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus, and substantia nigra, as illustrated in Figure 4.2. Movement information is integrated and modulated in these basal ganglia nuclei and then transmitted down the brain stem to the spinal cord. At spinal cord levels the correct sequence of muscle activation that has been programmed is accomplished. Activated nerves from appropriate regions of the spinal cord relay the signals to the proper muscles. Sensory information from the periphery (limbs) travels in the opposite direction. How are these signals transmitted? Brain cells called neurons have long, wire-like extensions that interface with other neurons, effectively making up circuits that are slightly similar to computer circuits; this is illustrated in Figure 4.3. At the end of these wire-like extensions are tiny enlargements (terminals) that contain specific biological chemicals called neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters are released when the electrical signal travels down that neuron to the end of that wire-like process.

Brain stem responses to electrical stimulation of ventral vagal gastric fibers

1989 ◽  
Vol 257 (1) ◽  
pp. G24-G29
Author(s):  
W. D. Barber ◽  
C. S. Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Time Of Arrival ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Proximal Stomach ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Sensory Modalities ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Stimulation Of

The brain stem neuronal responses to electrical stimulation of gastric branches of the ventral vagal trunk serving the proximal stomach were localized and evaluated in anesthetized cats. The responses were equally distributed bilaterally in the region of nucleus solitarius in the caudal brain stem. The mean latency of the response was 289 +/- 46 (SD) ms, which translated into a conduction velocity of less than 1 m/s based on the distance between the stimulating and recording electrodes. The responses consisted of single and multiple spikes that showed slight variability in the latency, indicating orthodromic activation via a synapse in approximately 98% of the responses recorded. Forty two percent of the units tested showed evidence of convergence of input from vagal afferent fibers in different branches of the ventral vagal trunk that served the proximal stomach. The resultant activity pattern of the unitary response appeared to be the product of 1) the gastric sensory input or modality conveyed by the afferent source and 2) the time of arrival and diversity of modalities served by other gastric afferents impinging on the unit. This provides a mechanism capable of responding on the basis of specific sensory modalities that dynamically reflect ongoing events monitored and conveyed by other gastric afferents in the region.

Differential Patterns of Spinal Sympathetic Outflow Involving a 10-Hz Rhythm

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 841-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard L. Gebber ◽  
Sheng Zhong ◽  
Craig Lewis ◽  
Susan M. Barman
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stem ◽  
Phase Angle ◽  
Sympathetic Nerves ◽  
Phase Relations ◽  
Sympathetic Outflow ◽  
Free Running ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Electrical Stimuli ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Stimulation Of

Time and frequency domain analyses were used to examine the changes in the relationships between the discharges of the inferior cardiac (CN) and vertebral (VN) postganglionic sympathetic nerves produced by electrical activation of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) in urethan-anesthetized, baroreceptor-denervated cats. CN-VN coherence and phase angle in the 10-Hz band served as measures of the coupling of the central oscillators controlling these nerves. The 10-Hz rhythm in CN and VN discharges was entrained 1:1 to electrical stimuli applied to the PAG at frequencies between 7 and 12 Hz. CN 10-Hz discharges were increased, and VN 10-Hz discharges were decreased when the frequency of PAG stimulation was equal to or above that of the free-running rhythm. In contrast, stimulation of the same PAG sites at lower frequencies increased, albeit disproportionately, the 10-Hz discharges of both nerves. In either case, PAG stimulation significantly increased the phase angle between the two signals (VN 10-Hz activity lagged CN activity); coherence values relating their discharges were little affected. However, the increase in phase angle was significantly more pronounced when the 10-Hz discharges of the two nerves were reciprocally affected. Importantly, partialization of the phase spectrum using the PAG stimuli did not reverse the change in CN-VN phase angle. This observation suggests that the increase in the CN-VN phase angle reflected changes in the phase relations between coupled oscillators in the brain stem rather than the difference in conduction times to the two nerves from the site of PAG stimulation. In contrast to the effects elicited by PAG stimulation, stimulation of the medullary lateral tegmental field induced uniform increases in the 10-Hz discharges of the two nerves and no change in the CN-VN phase angle. Our results demonstrate that changes in the phase relations among coupled brain stem 10-Hz oscillators are accompanied by differential patterns of spinal sympathetic outflow. The reciprocal changes in CN and VN discharges produced by PAG stimulation are consistent with the pattern of spinal sympathetic outflow expected during the defense reaction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document