Response and receptive-field properties of spinomesencephalic tract cells in the cat

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Yezierski ◽  
R. H. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Primary Afferent Fibers

Recordings were made from 90 identified spinomesencephalic tract (SMT) cells in the lumbosacral spinal cord of cats anesthetized with alpha-chloralose and pentobarbital sodium. Recording sites were located in laminae I-VIII. Antidromic stimulation sites were located in different regions of the rostral and caudal midbrain including the periaqueductal gray, midbrain reticular formation, and the deep layers of the superior colliculus. Twelve SMT cells were antidromically activated from more than one midbrain level or from sites in the medial thalamus. The mean conduction velocity for the population of cells sampled was 45.2 +/- 21.4 m/s. Cells were categorized based on their responses to graded intensities of mechanical stimuli and the location of excitatory and/or inhibitory receptive fields. Four major categories of cells were encountered: wide dynamic range (WDR); high threshold (HT); deep/tap; and nonresponsive. WDR and HT cells had excitatory and/or inhibitory receptive fields restricted to the ipsilateral hindlimb or extending to other parts of the body including the tail, forelimbs, and face. Some cells had long afterdischarges following noxious stimulation, whereas others had high rates of background activity that was depressed by nonnoxious and noxious stimuli. Deep/tap cells received convergent input from muscle, joint, or visceral primary afferent fibers. The placement of mechanical lesions at different rostrocaudal levels of the cervical spinal cord provided information related to the spinal trajectory of SMT axons. Six axons were located contralateral to the recording electrode in the ventrolateral/medial or lateral funiculi while two were located in the ventrolateral funiculus of the ipsilateral spinal cord. Stimulation at sites used to antidromically activate SMT cells resulted in the inhibition of background and evoked responses for 22 of 25 cells tested. Inhibitory effects were observed on responses evoked by low/high intensity cutaneous stimuli and by the activation of joint or muscle primary afferent fibers. Based on the response and receptive-field properties of SMT cells it is suggested that the SMT may have an important role in somatosensory mechanisms, particularly those related to nociception.

Structure-function relationships in rat medullary and cervical dorsal horns. II. Medullary dorsal horn cells

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. E. Renehan ◽  
M. F. Jacquin ◽  
R. D. Mooney ◽  
R. W. Rhoades
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Guard Hair ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Low Threshold

In Nembutal-anesthetized rats, 31 physiologically identified medullary dorsal horn (MDH) cells were labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Ten responded only to deflection of one or more vibrissae. Six cells were activated by guard hair movement only, six by deflection of guard hairs or vibrissa(e), and seven by pinch of facial skin with serrated forceps. Different classes of low-threshold cells could not be distinguished on the basis of their somadendritic morphologies or laminar distribution. Neurons activated by multiple vibrissae were unique, however, in that one sent its axon into the medial lemniscus, and three projected into the trigeminal spinal tract. None of the guard hair-only or vibrissae-plus-guard hair neurons had such projections. Cells that responded best to noxious stimulation were located mainly in laminae I, II, and deep V, while neurons activated by vibrissa(e) and/or guard hair deflection were located in layers III, IV, and superficial V. Low-threshold neurons generally had fairly thick dendrites with few spines, whereas high-threshold cells tended to have thinner dendrites with numerous spines. Moreover, the dendritic arbors of low-threshold cells were, for the most part, denser than those of the noxious cells. Neurons with mandibular receptive fields were located in the dorsomedial portion of the MDH; cells with ophthalmic fields were found in the ventrolateral MDH, and maxillary cells were interposed. Cells sensitive to deflection of dorsal mystacial vibrissae and/or guard hairs were located ventral to those activated by more ventral hairs. Neurons with rostral receptive fields were found in the rostral MDH, while cells activated by hairs of the caudal mystacial pad, periauricular, and periorbital regions were located in the caudal MDH. Receptive-field types were encountered that have not been reported for trigeminal primary afferent neurons: multiple vibrissae; vibrissae plus guard hairs; and wide dynamic range. The latter two can be explained by the convergence of different primary afferent types onto individual neurons. Our failure to find a significant relationship between dendritic area (in the transverse plane) and the number of vibrissae suggests that primary afferent convergence may not be responsible for the synthesis of the multiple vibrissae receptive field. Excitatory connections between MDH neurons may, therefore, account for multiple vibrissae receptive fields in the MDH.

Contralateral projection of primary afferent fibers to mammalian spinal cord

1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Culberson ◽  
D.E. Haines ◽  
D.L. Kimmel ◽  
Paul B. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Contralateral Projection ◽  
Primary Afferent Fibers

scholarly journals Response Properties of Whisker-Associated Trigeminothalamic Neurons in Rat Nucleus Principalis

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon S. Minnery ◽  
Daniel J. Simons
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Response Latencies ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Medial Nucleus ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Primary Afferent Fibers ◽  
Stimulus Features ◽  
Nucleus Principalis

Nucleus principalis (PrV) of the brain stem trigeminal complex mediates the processing and transfer of low-threshold mechanoreceptor input en route to the ventroposterior medial nucleus of the thalamus (VPM). In rats, this includes tactile information relayed from the large facial whiskers via primary afferent fibers originating in the trigeminal ganglion (NV). Here we describe the responses of antidromically identified VPM-projecting PrV neurons ( n = 72) to controlled ramp-and-hold deflections of whiskers. For comparison, we also recorded the responses of 64 NV neurons under identical experimental and stimulus conditions. Both PrV and NV neurons responded transiently to stimulus onset (on) and offset (off), and the majority of both populations also displayed sustained, or tonic, responses throughout the plateau phase of the stimulus (75% of NV cells and 93% of PrV cells). Averageon and off response magnitudes were similar between the two populations. In both NV and PrV, cells were highly sensitive to the direction of whisker deflection. Directional tuning was slightly but significantly greater in NV, suggesting that PrV neurons integrate inputs from NV cells differing in their preferred directions. Receptive fields of PrV neurons were typically dominated by a “principal” whisker (PW), whose evoked responses were on average threefold larger than those elicited by any given adjacent whisker (AW; n = 197). However, of the 65 PrV cells for which data from at least two AWs were obtained, most (89%) displayed statistically significanton responses to deflections of one or more AWs. AW response latencies were 2.7 ± 3.8 (SD) ms longer than those of their corresponding PWs, with an inner quartile latency difference of 1–4 ms (±25% of median). The range in latency differences suggests that some adjacent whisker responses arise within PrV itself, whereas others have a longer, multi-synaptic origin, possibly via the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Overall, our findings reveal that the stimulus features encoded by primary afferent neurons are reflected in the responses of VPM-projecting PrV neurons, and that significant convergence of information from multiple whiskers occurs at the first synaptic station in the whisker-to-barrel pathway.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document