Structure-function relationships in rat medullary and cervical dorsal horns. II. Medullary dorsal horn cells

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. E. Renehan ◽  
M. F. Jacquin ◽  
R. D. Mooney ◽  
R. W. Rhoades
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Guard Hair ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Low Threshold

In Nembutal-anesthetized rats, 31 physiologically identified medullary dorsal horn (MDH) cells were labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Ten responded only to deflection of one or more vibrissae. Six cells were activated by guard hair movement only, six by deflection of guard hairs or vibrissa(e), and seven by pinch of facial skin with serrated forceps. Different classes of low-threshold cells could not be distinguished on the basis of their somadendritic morphologies or laminar distribution. Neurons activated by multiple vibrissae were unique, however, in that one sent its axon into the medial lemniscus, and three projected into the trigeminal spinal tract. None of the guard hair-only or vibrissae-plus-guard hair neurons had such projections. Cells that responded best to noxious stimulation were located mainly in laminae I, II, and deep V, while neurons activated by vibrissa(e) and/or guard hair deflection were located in layers III, IV, and superficial V. Low-threshold neurons generally had fairly thick dendrites with few spines, whereas high-threshold cells tended to have thinner dendrites with numerous spines. Moreover, the dendritic arbors of low-threshold cells were, for the most part, denser than those of the noxious cells. Neurons with mandibular receptive fields were located in the dorsomedial portion of the MDH; cells with ophthalmic fields were found in the ventrolateral MDH, and maxillary cells were interposed. Cells sensitive to deflection of dorsal mystacial vibrissae and/or guard hairs were located ventral to those activated by more ventral hairs. Neurons with rostral receptive fields were found in the rostral MDH, while cells activated by hairs of the caudal mystacial pad, periauricular, and periorbital regions were located in the caudal MDH. Receptive-field types were encountered that have not been reported for trigeminal primary afferent neurons: multiple vibrissae; vibrissae plus guard hairs; and wide dynamic range. The latter two can be explained by the convergence of different primary afferent types onto individual neurons. Our failure to find a significant relationship between dendritic area (in the transverse plane) and the number of vibrissae suggests that primary afferent convergence may not be responsible for the synthesis of the multiple vibrissae receptive field. Excitatory connections between MDH neurons may, therefore, account for multiple vibrissae receptive fields in the MDH.

Response and receptive-field properties of spinomesencephalic tract cells in the cat

1986 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Yezierski ◽  
R. H. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Primary Afferent Fibers

Recordings were made from 90 identified spinomesencephalic tract (SMT) cells in the lumbosacral spinal cord of cats anesthetized with alpha-chloralose and pentobarbital sodium. Recording sites were located in laminae I-VIII. Antidromic stimulation sites were located in different regions of the rostral and caudal midbrain including the periaqueductal gray, midbrain reticular formation, and the deep layers of the superior colliculus. Twelve SMT cells were antidromically activated from more than one midbrain level or from sites in the medial thalamus. The mean conduction velocity for the population of cells sampled was 45.2 +/- 21.4 m/s. Cells were categorized based on their responses to graded intensities of mechanical stimuli and the location of excitatory and/or inhibitory receptive fields. Four major categories of cells were encountered: wide dynamic range (WDR); high threshold (HT); deep/tap; and nonresponsive. WDR and HT cells had excitatory and/or inhibitory receptive fields restricted to the ipsilateral hindlimb or extending to other parts of the body including the tail, forelimbs, and face. Some cells had long afterdischarges following noxious stimulation, whereas others had high rates of background activity that was depressed by nonnoxious and noxious stimuli. Deep/tap cells received convergent input from muscle, joint, or visceral primary afferent fibers. The placement of mechanical lesions at different rostrocaudal levels of the cervical spinal cord provided information related to the spinal trajectory of SMT axons. Six axons were located contralateral to the recording electrode in the ventrolateral/medial or lateral funiculi while two were located in the ventrolateral funiculus of the ipsilateral spinal cord. Stimulation at sites used to antidromically activate SMT cells resulted in the inhibition of background and evoked responses for 22 of 25 cells tested. Inhibitory effects were observed on responses evoked by low/high intensity cutaneous stimuli and by the activation of joint or muscle primary afferent fibers. Based on the response and receptive-field properties of SMT cells it is suggested that the SMT may have an important role in somatosensory mechanisms, particularly those related to nociception.

Alteration of Medullary Dorsal Horn Neuronal Activity Following Inferior Alveolar Nerve Transection in Rats

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 2868-2877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Iwata ◽  
Takao Imai ◽  
Yoshiyuki Tsuboi ◽  
Akimasa Tashiro ◽  
Akiko Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Neuronal Activity ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Escape Behavior ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Whisker Pad ◽  
Wdr Neurons

The effects of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) transection on escape behavior and MDH neuronal activity to noxious and nonnoxious stimulation of the face were precisely analyzed. Relative thresholds for escape from mechanical stimulation applied to the whisker pad area ipsilateral to the transection were significantly lower than that for the contralateral and sham-operated whisker pad until 28 days after the transection, then returned to the preoperative level at 40 days after transection. A total of 540 neurons were recorded from the medullary dorsal horn (MDH) of the nontreated naive rats [low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM), 27; wide dynamic range (WDR), 31; nociceptive specific (NS), 11] and sham-operated rats with skin incision (LTM, 34; WDR, 30; NS, 23) and from the ipsilateral (LTM, 82; WDR, 82; NS, 31) and contralateral MDH relative to the IAN transection (LTM, 77; WDR, 82; NS, 33). The electrophysiological properties of these neurons were precisely analyzed. Background activity of WDR neurons on the ipsilateral side relative to the transection was significantly increased at 2–14 days after the operation as compared with that of naive rats. Innocuous and noxious mechanical-evoked responses of LTM and WDR neurons were significantly enhanced at 2–14 days after IAN transection. The mean area of the receptive fields of WDR neurons was significantly larger on the ipsilateral MDH at 2–7 days after transection than that of naive rats. We could not observe any modulation of thermal responses of WDR and NS neurons following IAN transection. Also, no MDH neurons were significantly affected in the rats with sham operations. The present findings suggest that the increment of neuronal activity of WDR neurons in the MDH following IAN transection may play an important role in the development of the mechano-allodynia induced in the area adjacent to the area innervated by the injured nerve.

Lateral cervical nucleus in the cat: functional organization and characteristics

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1511-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Craig ◽  
D. N. Tapper
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Receptor Type ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Lateral Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The lateral cervical nucleus (LCN) was investigated with extracellular recordings in the anesthetized cat. A total of 556 LCN units were characterized; the locations of most of these were histologically verified. Half of these had receptive fields on the rostral third of the ipsilateral body surface including the face; 14% had fields on the thorax or abdomen, 33% had fields on the hindlimb or tail, and about 3% had receptive fields larger than one limb. 2. The LCN was observed to be somatotopically organized in experiments using angled microelectrode penetrations. Hindlimb units were dorsolateral, forelimb units ventromedial, and face units most medial within the LCN. In regions where LCN cells were present only in the medial portion of the dorsolateral funiculus, they were all forelimb units. 3. A special subpopulation (17%) of cells were clustered most ventromedially in the LCN. These units had large or disjoint receptive fields, and/or responded to deep, visceral, or noxious stimulation. A third of these did not project in the medial lemniscus (ML); many were synaptically activated by stimulation of the ML. Those that did project in the ML had significantly longer latencies than all other LCN units. It is suggested that this subpopulation contains local LCN interneurons. 4. The specific mechanoreceptor inputs were identified for each of 121 projecting LCN units. Receptor inputs were uniform across each receptive field; that is, each unit that responded to a given receptor type was observed to respond to receptors of that type throughout its receptive field. Input from large-fiber-diameter, velocity-sensitive mechanoreceptors was predominant. The absence of input from slowly adapting type I and II receptors and from joint receptors was confirmed. A significant number of units (17.3%) could be driven by only one receptor type. The LCN sample profile agrees closely with the receptor representation in the hindlimb portion of the spinocervical tract. It is concluded that these data that anatomic specification of convergence occurs in the LCN with respect to receptor connectivity, and that this specification originates in lamina IV of the dorsal horn. 5. Stimulation of the dorsal column nuclei synaptically excited 23% of the LCN units tested. In two cases it was possible to demonstrate, by collision, that this occurred via collaterals of spinocervical tract axons. It is concluded that some spinocervical axons have collaterals terminating in the rostral parts of the dorsal column nuclei.

The modulation of sensory transmission through the medullary dorsal horn during cortically driven mastication

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joong Soo Kim ◽  
M. Catherine Bushnell ◽  
Gary H. Duncan ◽  
James P. Lund
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Unit Activity ◽  
Sensorimotor Cortex ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Cortical Stimulation ◽  
Motor Nucleus ◽  
Trigeminal Motor Nucleus ◽  
Sensory Transmission ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Low Threshold

During mastication, reflexes are modulated and sensory transmission is altered in interneurons and ascending pathways of the rostral trigeminal sensory complex. The current experiment examines the modulation of sensory transmission through the most caudal part of the trigeminal sensory system, the medullary dorsal horn, during fictive mastication produced by cortical stimulation. Extracellular single unit activity was recorded from the medullary dorsal horn, and multiple unit activity was recorded from the trigeminal motor nucleus in anesthetized, paralyzed rabbits. The masticatory area of sensorimotor cortex was stimulated to produce rhythmic activity in the trigeminal motor nucleus (fictive mastication). Activity in the dorsal horn was compared in the presence and absence of cortical stimulation. Fifty-two percent of neurons classified as low threshold and 83% of neurons receiving noxious inputs were influenced by cortical stimulation. The cortical effects were mainly inhibitory, but 21% of wide dynamic range and 6% of low threshold cells were excited by cortical stimulation. The modulation produced by cortical stimulation, whether inhibitory or excitatory, was not phasically related to the masticatory cycle. It is likely that, when masticatory movements are commanded by the sensorimotor cortex, the program includes tonic changes in sensory transmission through the medullary dorsal horn.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Surgical Incision on Dorsal Horn Neuronal Receptive Field Size and Responses during Postnatal Development

2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 698-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Ririe ◽  
Lindsay R. Bremner ◽  
Maria Fitzgerald
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Spike Activity ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neuron ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Rat Pups

Background Pain behavior in response to skin incision is developmentally regulated, but little is known about the underlying neuronal mechanisms. The authors hypothesize that the spatial activation and intensity of dorsal horn neuron responses to skin incision differ in immature and adult spinal cord. Methods Single wide-dynamic-range dorsal horn cell spike activity was recorded for a minimum of 2 h from anesthetized rat pups aged 7 and 28 days. Cutaneous pinch and brush receptive fields were mapped and von Frey hair thresholds were determined on the plantar hind paw before and 1 h after a skin incision was made. Results Baseline receptive field areas for brush and pinch were larger and von Frey thresholds lower in the younger animals. One hour after the incision, brush and pinch receptive field area, spontaneous firing, and evoked spike activity had significantly increased in the 7-day-old animals but not in the 28-day-old animals. Von Frey hair thresholds decreased at both ages. Conclusions Continuous recording from single dorsal horn cells both before and after injury shows that sensitization of receptive fields and of background and afferent-evoked spike activity at 1 h is greater in younger animals. This difference is not reflected in von Frey mechanical thresholds. These results highlight the importance of studying the effects of injury on sensory neuron physiology. Injury in young animals induces a marked and rapid increase in afferent-evoked activity in second-order sensory neurons, which may be important when considering long-term effects and analgesic interventions.

Fos-like immunoreactivity in the superficial medullary dorsal horn induced by noxious and innocuous thermal stimulation of facial skin in the rat

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1811-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Strassman ◽  
B. P. Vos ◽  
Y. Mineta ◽  
S. Naderi ◽  
D. Borsook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Primary Afferent ◽  
Lamina I ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Cold Receptors ◽  
Warm Receptors ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Fos Expression ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. To examine further the ability of different classes of nociceptive and nonnociceptive primary afferent neurons to induce c-fos expression in central neurons, fos-like immunoreactivity was examined in the medullary dorsal horn (laminae I-IV) of the rat after facial application of a range of warming and cooling thermal stimuli. Urethan-anesthetized rats received 15 30-s thermal pulses (53, 50, 47, 41, 25, or 10 degrees C) applied to the vibrissal pad over a period of 30 min and were perfused 2 h after the end of stimulation. 2. Stimulation of 41 degrees C produced no significant increase in the number of fos-LI-labeled cells in lamina I or II compared with control (35 degrees C) animals. 3. Stimulation of 47 degrees C produced a significant increase in the number of fos-LI-labeled cells in both laminae I and II. Stimulation of 50 degrees C produced a significant increase in labeling, compared with that produced by 47 degrees C, which was primarily in lamina II. Stimulation of 53 degrees C produced no further increase in the number of labeled cells, compared with that produced by 50 degrees C, in lamina I or II. 4. In the cooling direction, 25 degrees C produced a significant increase in labeling above control levels in both lamina I and II, whereas 10 degrees C produced a further increase compared with 25 degrees C, which was restricted to lamina I. 5. None of the stimuli produced a significant increase in labeling in laminae III-IV. 6. The results are interpreted as providing evidence that low-threshold cold receptors, high-threshold cold receptors, and nociceptors are capable of inducing fos expression in dorsal horn neurons, whereas warm receptors are relatively ineffective. The results also provide evidence that neurons that receive input from C polymodal nociceptors are present in both laminae I and II, as are neurons that receive input from low-threshold cold receptors. Neurons that receive input from high-threshold cold receptors, but not from low-threshold cold receptors, appear to be located preferentially in lamina I. The shape of the curve relating fos-LI labeling to stimulus temperature in the warming direction is consistent with the expected pattern of recruitment of primary afferent nociceptors.

Low-threshold neuronal activity of spinal dorsal horn neurons increases during REM sleep in cats: comparison with effects of anesthesia

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 763-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kishikawa ◽  
H. Uchida ◽  
Y. Yamamori ◽  
J. G. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Slow Wave ◽  
Rem Sleep ◽  
Spinal Dorsal Horn ◽  
Neuronal Response ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spinal Dorsal ◽  
Tungsten Microelectrode ◽  
Low Threshold

1. Cats were prepared for chronic recordings from the lumbar enlargement of the spinal dorsal horn. At the beginning of each recording session, a tungsten microelectrode was advanced through the dura in a physiologically intact, awake, drug-free animal, until amplitude discrimination provided a single neuron with a receptive field on the hindquarters. 2. Extracellular recordings of activity of each neuron were made during receptive field stimulation with tactile and thermal nonnoxious and noxious stimuli. 3. Baseline responses obtained in the awake state were compared with responses of the same neurons during slow-wave or rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep. In a subpopulation of neurons, the effects of anesthesia (propofol, 7.5 mg/kg iv) were observed after the completion of sleep studies. 4. The low-threshold receptive fields of the seven neurons studied during REM sleep were all increased in size when compared with the baseline value. The average increase was 52.6% (range 26.2–96.7%). 5. The low-threshold receptive fields of the seven neurons studied during REM sleep were reduced by propofol anesthesia by an average of 49.1% (range 29–74%). 6. Neuronal response to receptive field brushing was observed in 15 neurons during REM sleep. The effect of propofol on receptive field brushing was observed in 8 of those neurons. In only one of those eight neurons were the effects of REM sleep and anesthesia in the same direction. 7. Changes in neuronal responses were less consistent during slow-wave sleep but still differed from changes induced by propofol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of responses of cutaneous nociceptive and nonnociceptive brain stem neurons in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) and subnucleus oralis to natural and electrical stimulation of tooth pulp

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Hu ◽  
B. J. Sessle
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Tooth Pulp ◽  
Canine Tooth ◽  
Nociceptive Neurons ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Stimulation Of

The activity of 160 single neurons excited by electrical stimulation of the canine tooth pulp was studied in the subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) and the subnucleus oralis of the trigeminal (V) spinal tract nucleus in chloralose-anesthetized cats to test the effects of natural as well as electrical stimulation of the tooth pulp. The neurons were functionally classified on the basis of their cutaneous receptive-field properties as low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM), wide dynamic range (WDR), or nociceptive specific (NS). The orofacial receptive-field properties and responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the tooth pulp indicated that the oralis and caudalis neurons examined had characteristics typical of those previously documented for oralis LTM neurons and for caudalis LTM, WDR, and NS neurons. Each neuron was also tested with cold and warm stimulation of the canine tooth, and some neurons were also tested for responsiveness to thermal stimulation of the premolar tooth or to mechanical and chemical stimuli delivered to the dentine of the canine tooth. Although all the neurons could be excited by electrical stimulation of the pulp, we found that the only neurons that consistently responded to thermal pulp stimuli were those located in the V subnucleus caudalis. Moreover, only those caudalis neurons that had been functionally classified as nociceptive (4 WDR and 21 NS neurons) showed this responsiveness. Heating of the canine or premolar tooth excited 24 of these 25 nociceptive neurons; cooling activated only 3, and none of the small number of neurons tested with mechanical and chemical stimulation of the dentine was excited. The response of the nociceptive neurons to heating of the tooth contrasted with the responses of the same neurons to pinching and heating of their cutaneous receptive field.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effect of Propofol on Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons: Comparison with Lack of Ketamine Effects

1995 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1312-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Uchida ◽  
Kazuhiro Kishikawa ◽  
J. G. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Spinal Dorsal Horn ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
General Anesthetics ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons ◽  
Spinal Dorsal ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons

Abstract Background Pentobarbital reduces low-threshold receptive field (RF) size and enhances responses of some spinal dorsal horn neurons to noxious stimulation in cats. To better understand the effects of general anesthetics on spinal sensory processing, this study was designed to determine if intravenous propofol and ketamine have similar effects.

Descending inhibitory influences from periaqueductal gray, nucleus raphe magnus, and adjacent reticular formation. II. Effects on medullary dorsal horn nociceptive and nonnociceptive neurons

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 948-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Dostrovsky ◽  
Y. Shah ◽  
B. G. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Periaqueductal Gray ◽  
Nucleus Raphe Magnus ◽  
Nucleus Reticularis ◽  
Medullary Dorsal Horn ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Raphe Magnus ◽  
Somatosensory Responses ◽  
Wdr Neurons

1. This study examined the inhibitory effects elicited by brain stem stimulation on the somatosensory responses of trigeminal medullary dorsal horn (subnucleus caudalis of the spinal trigeminal nucleus) neurons. Single-unit extracellular recordings were obtained in chloralose-anesthetized cats. Neurons were classified as wide dynamic range (WDR), nociceptive specific (NS), or low-threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM). Conditioning stimuli were delivered to the periaqueductal gray (PAG), nucleus cuneiformis (CU), nucleus raphe magnus (NRM), nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (NGC), and nucleus reticularis magnocellularis (NMC). 2. Over 97% of the neurons tested could be inhibited by stimulation in all regions except PAG. Stimulation in the PAG inhibited 91% of the neurons tested. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of inhibition of WDR and NS nociceptive (noci) neurons and the LTM nonnociceptive (nonnoci) neurons. 3. Mean stimulation intensities necessary to produce inhibition were determined for each neuron from each stimulation site. The current thresholds necessary to inhibit the responses of noci neurons were found to be significantly lower, on the average, than those of nonnoci neurons at stimulation sites in the PAG, CU, and NGC. 4. Inhibition of the responses of WDR neurons required a lower mean current than for NS neurons but was statistically significant only for PAG and NGC. Thresholds for inhibiting the responses of NS neurons were similar to those for inhibiting the responses of LTM neurons for all regions except CU, where LTM thresholds were markedly but not significantly higher. 5. Stimulation thresholds were found to be lowest in NMC, while in NGC, NRM, and CU they were all similar and slightly higher. Stimulation in the PAG required the highest currents to produce inhibition. 6. These results indicate that stimulation in NRM and PAG not only inhibits the responses of noci neurons but also those of nonnoci neurons. Furthermore, stimulation in reticular regions adjacent to NRM and PAG is frequently even more effective in inhibiting the responses of both noci and nonnoci neurons. In addition, WDR neurons are more effectively inhibited than NS or LTM neurons. These results are compared with those obtained using similar methods in cat lumbar dorsal horn.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document