scholarly journals The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neel T. Shah ◽  
Kelly N. Wright ◽  
Gudrun M. Jonsdottir ◽  
Selena Jorgensen ◽  
Jon I. Einarsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cost Minimization ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Robotic Hysterectomy

Objectives. We assess whether it is feasible for robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer to be less expensive to society than traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy or abdominal hysterectomy.Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patient characteristics, operative times, complications, and hospital charges from all () endometrial cancer patients who underwent hysterectomy in 2009 at our hospital. Per patient costs of each hysterectomy method were examined from the societal perspective. Sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were performed using a cost-minimization model.Results. 40 (17.1%) of hysterectomies for endometrial cancer were robotic, 91 (38.9%), were abdominal, and 103 (44.0%) were laparoscopic. 96.3% of the variation in operative cost between patients was predicted by operative time (, ). Mean operative time for robotic hysterectomy was significantly longer than other methods (). Abdominal hysterectomy was consistently the most expensive while the traditional laparoscopic approach was consistently least expensive. The threshold in operative time that makes robotic hysterectomy cost equivalent to the abdominal approach is within the range of our experience.Conclusion. It is feasible for robotic hysterectomy to be less expensive than abdominal hysterectomy, but unlikely for robotic hysterectomy to be less expensive than traditional laparoscopy.

The shift from inpatient to outpatient hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in the United States: trends, enabling factors, cost, and safety

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002192
Author(s):  
Serena Cappuccio ◽  
Yanli Li ◽  
Chao Song ◽  
Emeline Liu ◽  
Gretchen Glaser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Robotic Hysterectomy ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Enabling Factors ◽  
Healthcare Database ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in outpatient versus inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and assess enabling factors, cost and safety.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients aged 18 years or older who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer between January 2008 and September 2015 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. The surgical approach for hysterectomy was classified as open/abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic or robotic assisted. We described trends in surgical setting, perioperative costs and safety. The impact of patient, provider and hospital characteristics on outpatient migration was assessed using multivariate logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 41 246 patients who met inclusion criteria. During the time period studied, we observed a 41.3% shift from inpatient to outpatient hysterectomy (p<0.0001), an increase in robotic hysterectomy, and a decrease in abdominal hysterectomy. The robotic hysterectomy approach, more recent procedure (year), and mid-sized hospital were factors that enabled outpatient hysterectomies; while abdominal hysterectomy, older age, Medicare insurance, black ethnicity, higher number of comorbidities, and concomitant procedures were associated with an inpatient setting. The shift towards outpatient hysterectomy led to a $2500 savings per case during the study period, in parallel to the increased robotic hysterectomy rates (p<0.001). The post-discharge 30-day readmission and complications rate after outpatient hysterectomy remained stable at around 2%.ConclusionsA significant shift from inpatient to outpatient setting was observed for hysterectomies performed for endometrial cancer over time. Minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, facilitated this migration, preserving clinical outcomes and leading to reduction in costs.

Long-term quality of life outcomes of women treated for early-stage endometrial cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002145
Author(s):  
Saira Sanjida ◽  
Andreas Obermair ◽  
Val Gebski ◽  
Nigel Armfield ◽  
Monika Janda
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy

ObjectiveTo compare long-term quality of life in women treated for early-stage endometrial cancer with population norms, and to compare quality of life outcomes of patients who had total laparoscopic or total abdominal hysterectomy.MethodsOnce the last enrolled patient had completed 4.5 years of follow-up after surgery, participants in the Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) clinical trial were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Two instruments—EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General Population (FACT-GP)—were used to determine quality of life. The mean computed EQ-5D-3L index scores for LACE participants at different age categories were compared with Australian normative scores; and the FACT-GP scores were compared between patients treated with surgical treatments.ResultsOf 760 women originally enrolled in the LACE trial, 259 (50.2%) of 516 women consented to provide long-term follow-up data at a median of 9 years (range 6—12) after surgery. On the EQ-5D-3L, long-term endometrial cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of anxiety/depression than normative levels across all age groups (55–64 years, 30% vs 14.9%; 65–74 years, 30.1% vs 15.8%; ≥75 years, 25.9% vs 10.7%). For women ≥75 years of age, the prevalence of impairment in mobility (57.6% vs 43.3%) and usual activities (58.8% vs 37.9%) was also higher than for population norms. For the FACT-GP, the physical (effect size: −0.28, p<0.028) and functional (effect size: −0.30, p<0.015) well-being sub-scale favored the total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy recipients.ConclusionCompared with population-based norms, long-term endometrial cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of anxiety/depression across all age groups, and deficits in mobility and usual activities for women aged ≥75 years. Physical and functional well-being were better among women who were treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy than among those receiving total abdominal hysterectomy.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
Hakan Nazik
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Uterine Leiomyomata

Modern laparoscopic surgery is widely used throughout the world as it offers greater advantages than open procedures. The laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy has evolved over the last 20 years. Hysterectomies are performed abdominally, vaginally, laparoscopically or, more recently, with robotic assistance. Indications for a total laparoscopic hysterectomy are similar to those for total abdominal hysterectomy, and most commonly include uterine leiomyomata, pelvic organ prolapse, and abnormal uterine bleeding. When hysterectomy is going to be performed, the surgeon should decide which method is safer and more cost-effective. This paper aims to make a review of the indications, techniques and advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy as well as the criteria to be used for appropriate patient selection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document