scholarly journals Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Portal Vein Thrombosis of Cirrhotic Patients: Only Therapeutic Purposes?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Licinio ◽  
Mariabeatrice Principi ◽  
Giuseppe Losurdo ◽  
Nicola Maurizio Castellaneta ◽  
Enzo Ierardi ◽  
...  

Cirrhosis has always been regarded as hemorrhagic coagulopathy caused by the reduction in the hepatic synthesis of procoagulant proteins. However, with the progression of liver disease, the cirrhotic patient undergoes a high rate of thrombotic phenomena in the portal venous system. Although the progression of liver failure produces a reduction in the synthesis of anticoagulant molecules, a test able to detect the patients with hemostatic balance shifting towards hypercoagulability has not yet been elaborated. The need of treatment and/or prophylaxis of cirrhotic patients is demonstrated by the increased mortality, the risk of bleeding from esophageal varices, and the mortality of liver transplantation, when portal vein thrombosis (PVT) occurs even if current guidelines do not give indications about PVT treatment in cirrhosis. In view of the general feeling that the majority of cirrhotic patients at an advanced stage may be in a procoagulant condition (suggested by the sharp increase in the prevalence of PVT), it is presumable that a prophylaxis of this population could be of benefit. The safety and the efficacy of prophylaxis and treatment with enoxaparin in patients with cirrhosis demonstrated by a single paper suggest this option only in controlled trials and, currently, there are no sufficient evidences for a recommendation in the clinical practice.

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (39) ◽  
pp. 4419-4427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Gîrleanu ◽  
Anca Trifan ◽  
Carol Stanciu ◽  
Cătălin Sfarti

2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552199850
Author(s):  
Omkolsoum Alhaddad ◽  
Maha Elsabaawy ◽  
Omar Elshaaraawy ◽  
Mohamed Elhalawany ◽  
Mohamed Mohamed Houseni ◽  
...  

Portal vein thrombosis is a catastrophe not uncommonly complicating hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis. To estimate its prevalence and clinical characteristics, we investigated 1000 cirrhotic patients by abdominal ultrasound or Doppler study at least. Portal vein thrombosis was found in 21.6%, of whom 157 (72.7%) had malignancy. Complete portal vein thrombosis was found in 70.4%. Half of all these patients had at least one episode of portal hypertensive bleeding, a third had abdominal pain and a quarter presented with jaundice. Portal bilopathy was diagnosed in two cases (0.9%). There was significant association between severity of liver disease, ascites, male gender and site of segmental focal lesion and portal vein thrombosis.


Gut ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 2156-2168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Lv ◽  
Xingshun Qi ◽  
Chuangye He ◽  
Zhengyu Wang ◽  
Zhanxin Yin ◽  
...  

ObjectiveLimited data are available on the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents versus endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding among patients with cirrhosis and PVT.DesignConsecutive cirrhotic patients (94% Child-Pugh class A or B) with PVT who had variceal bleeding in the past 6 weeks were randomly assigned to TIPS group (n=24) or EBL plus propranolol group (EBL+drug, n=25), respectively. Primary endpoint was variceal rebleeding. Secondary endpoints included survival, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), portal vein recanalisation and rethrombosis, other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 30 months in both groups, variceal rebleeding was significantly less frequent in the TIPS group (15% vs 45% at 1 year and 25% vs 50% at 2 years, respectively; HR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.76, p=0.008), with a significantly higher portal vein recanalisation rate (95% vs 70%; p=0.03) and a relatively lower rethrombosis rate (5% vs 33%; p=0.06) compared with the EBL+drug group. There were no statistically significant differences in survival (67% vs 84%; p=0.152), OHE (25% vs 16%; p=0.440), other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events between groups.ConclusionCovered TIPS placement in patients with PVT and moderately decompensated cirrhosis was more effective than EBL combined with propranolol for the prevention of rebleeding, with a higher probability of PVT resolution without increasing the risk of OHE and adverse effects, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01326949.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 1340-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Endo ◽  
Takayoshi Oikawa ◽  
Keisuke Kakisaka ◽  
Akio Tamura ◽  
Shigeru Ehara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. S146
Author(s):  
B. Carney ◽  
C. Zhan ◽  
C. Li ◽  
Y. Zhu ◽  
H. Weinberger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 252-252
Author(s):  
Feifei Hou ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Xiaozhong Guo ◽  
Xingshun Qi

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akin Tekin ◽  
Thiago Beduschi ◽  
Rodrigo Vianna ◽  
Richard S. Mangus

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document