scholarly journals Morphological Diversity of Pretibial Myxedema and Its Mechanism of Evolving Process and Outcome: A Retrospective Study of 216 Cases

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changgui Lan ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Xia Zeng ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Xiaoxi Zou
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Morphological Diversity ◽  
Process And Outcome ◽  
Local Trauma ◽  
Large Case Series ◽  
Pretibial Myxedema ◽  
Chronic Course ◽  
Perivascular Infiltration ◽  
Large Case ◽  
Cd4 Lymphocytes

Background. Pretibial myxedema (PTM) is a rare dermopathy. The morphologic features and mechanism of its evolving process are not reported in large case series.Methods. 216 cases with PTM were retrospectively reviewed to analyze demographics, history, lesional morphology and its evolving process, histopathology and immunohistochemistry, serum TRAb levels, treatment, and outcome.Results. First appearing lesions evolved into 6 variants that were correlated with serum TRAb levels. Subvariants were caused by different kinds and frequencies of local trauma. The evolving process could be classified into 4 stages that were correlated with serum TRAb levels and perivascular infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocytes. Serum TRAb levels at remission and in nonrecurred cases became lower than those before therapy and in recurred cases, respectively, but increased when PTM relapsed. TRAb level in nodule variant went down invariably with the extension of course and its autoimmune activity had a trend to stop but in other 5 variants TRAb levels fluctuated. Their autoimmune activities had no trends to stop and clinically worsen through intermittent repeats of active and stable stages.Conclusions. In the chronic course of PTM, nodule variant is self-limited and other 5 variants are not self-limited. PTM needed early treatment to avoid severe variants.

Myelopathy Due to CAR-T Related Neurotoxicity Treated with Siltuximab

2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001078
Author(s):  
Yasmin Aghajan ◽  
Alison Yu ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
Austin I. Kim ◽  
Leslie Kean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Car T ◽  
Large Case Series ◽  
Large Case

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy is highly effective for relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancy [1,2]; however, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity are observed in up to 77% of patients [3]. In large case series, the most common presentations of neurotoxicity were encephalopathy (57%), headache (42%), tremor (38%) and aphasia (35%). CART mediated spinal cord toxicity is not well characterized. Structural neurologic damage (stroke and intracranial hemorrhage) was only observed in 1-2% and seizures were seen in 1%-8% of cases [3, 4]. Neuroimaging findings in patients with neurotoxicity are rare and not specific.

scholarly journals Donor Screening for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Han Hee Lee ◽  
Young-Seok Cho
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Screening Process ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Donor Screening ◽  
Large Case Series ◽  
Large Case

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which has been established as the standard treatment for recurrent <i>Clostroides</i> difficile infection, may also play a role in the management of other diseases associated with dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. To ensure efficacy and safety of FMT, an appropriate donor screening process is required. The main purpose of donor screening is to check for infectious diseases that could be transmitted to the recipient. The screening process involves a medical history questionnaire, and blood and stool testing. Several randomized clinical trials and large case series on FMT reported no, or few, adverse events related to infection by following this donor screening process. However, there is still concern over the transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In addition, a low donor acceptance rate due to rigorous screening makes donor recruitment difficult, and also imposes a significant cost burden. A consensus on the most crucial elements of donor screening is needed for wide application of FMT.

Comparison of auricular and rectal temperature measurement in normothermic, hypothermic, and hyperthermic dogs

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Kruse ◽  
R. Müller ◽  
C. Stockhaus ◽  
K. Hartmann ◽  
A. Wehner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Temperature ◽  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Temperature Measurement ◽  
Rectal Temperature ◽  
Environmental Temperature ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Large Case Series ◽  
Healthy Dogs ◽  
Large Case

Summary Objective: Measurement of rectal temperature is the most common method and considered gold standard for obtaining body temperature in dogs. So far, no study has been performed comparing agreement between rectal and auricular measurements in a large case series. The purpose of the study was to assess agreement between rectal and auricular temperature measurement in normothermic, hypothermic, and hyperthermic dogs with consideration of different environmental conditions and ear conformations. Materials and methods: Reference values for both methods were established using 62 healthy dogs. Three hundred dogs with various diseases (220 normothermic, 32 hypothermic, 48 hyperthermic) were enrolled in this prospective study. Rectal temperature was compared to auricular temperature and differences in agreement with regard to environmental temperature, relative humidity, and different ear conformations (pendulous versus prick ears) were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Correlation between rectal and auricular temperature was significant (r: 0.892; p < 0.01). However, Bland-Altman plots showed an inacceptable variation of values (bias: 0.300 °C; limits of agreement: –0.606 to 1.206 °C). This variation was above a maximal clinical tolerance of 0.3 °C, which was established by experts’ opinion (n = 16). Relative humidity had a significant influence (p = 0.001), whereas environmental temperature did not. Conclusion: Variation between the two methods of measuring body temperature was clinically unacceptable. Clinical relevance: Although measurement of auricular temperature is fast, simple, and well tolerated, this method provides a clinically unacceptable difference to the rectal measurement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document