scholarly journals An Outcome Study of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion among Iranian Population

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Haghnegahdar ◽  
Mahsa Sedighi

Background and Aim. First-line treatment strategy for managing cervical disc herniation is conservative measures. In some cases, surgery is indicated either due to signs/symptoms of severe/progressive neurological deficits, or because of persistence of radicular pain despite 12 weeks of conservative treatment. Success for treatment of cervical disc herniation using ACDF has been successfully reported in the literature. We aim to determine the outcome of ACDF in treatment of cervical disc herniation among Iranians. Methods and Materials/Patients. In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 68 patients who had undergone ACDF for cervical disc herniation from March 2006 to March 2011. Outcome tools were as follows: (1) study-designed questionnaire that addressed residual and/or new complaints and subjective satisfaction with the operation; (2) recent (one week prior to the interview) postoperative VAS for neck and upper extremity radicular pain; (3) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) (standard Persian version); and (4) follow-up cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and lateral X-ray. Results. With mean follow-up time of 52.93 (months) ± 31.89 SD (range: 13–131 months), we had success rates with regard to ΔVAS for neck and radicular pain of 88.2% and 89.7%, respectively. Except QOL functional score of JOAMEQ, 100% success rate for the other 4 functional scores of JOAMEQ was achieved. Conclusion. ACDF is a successful surgical technique for the management of cervical disc herniation among Iranian population.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3;23 (6;3) ◽  
pp. 325-332
Author(s):  
Ipek Saadet Edipoglu

Background: Foraminal stenosis, defined as a narrowing of the cervical neural foramen, is one of the most common causes of upper extremity radicular pain. Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the effects of the severity of neural foraminal stenosis and spinal herniation level on treatment success in patients treated with interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESI) due to cervical disc herniation-related radiculopathy and their possible predictive roles. Study Design: A retrospective assessment. Setting: A university hospital interventional pain management center. Methods: We performed our study between August 2017 and February 2019, retrospectively. All patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical and demographic data, including pain scores before and after cervical ILESI in the first hour, third week, and third month follow-ups, presence of motor deficits, symptom side, symptom duration before cervical ILESI, and whether there was progression to surgery in the 3-month period after injection, were collected. Results: We evaluated 61 patients in the final analysis. When the spinal herniation levels and foraminal stenosis grades were compared, there was a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.003, P = 0.005). We reported significant correlations between foraminal stenosis grade (odds ratio [OR], –0.425, P = 0.038) and spinal herniation level (OR, –0.925, P = 0.001) and treatment success. Limitations: Our study’s design was retrospective. Conclusions: Cervical ILESI is a reliable treatment option that provides a significant reduction in pain of patients with cervical radiculopathy. However, the success of ILESI treatment may be negatively affected in these patients in the presence of high spinal level cervical disc herniation and severe foraminal stenosis. Therefore considering these 2 parameters in predicting the patient population who will benefit from cervical ILESI is of importance in terms of decreasing potential complications. Key words: Interlaminar epidural steroid injections, foraminal stenosis, spinal level, cervical disc herniation, radicular pain


2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1364-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Joswig ◽  
A. Neff ◽  
C. Ruppert ◽  
G. Hildebrandt ◽  
M. N. Stienen

AimsThe aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation.Patients and MethodsA cohort of 102 patients was prospectively followed, after an epidural steroid injection for radicular symptoms due to lumbar disc herniation, in 57 patients, and cervical disc herniation, in 45 patients. Those patients with persistent pain who requested a second injection were prospectively followed for one year. Radicular and local pain were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional outcome with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPAD), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12).ResultsA second injection was performed in 17 patients (29.8%) with lumbar herniation and seven (15.6%) with cervical herniation at a mean of 65.3 days (sd 46.5) and 47 days (sd 37.2), respectively, after the initial injection. All but one patient, who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, responded satisfactorily with a mean VAS for leg pain of 8.8 mm (sd 10.3) and a mean VAS for arm pain of 6.3 mm (sd 9) one year after the second injection, respectively. Similarly, functional outcome and HRQoL were improved significantly from the baseline scores: mean ODI, 12.3 (sd 12.4; p < 0.001); mean NPAD, 19.3 (sd 24.3; p = 0.041); mean SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) in lumbar herniation, 46.8 (sd 7.7; p < 0.001); mean SF-12 PCS in cervical herniation, 43 (sd 6.8; p = 0.103).ConclusionRepeat steroid injections are a justifiable form of treatment in symptomatic patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation whose symptoms are not satisfactorily relieved after the first injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1364–71.


2018 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. e23-e30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Du ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Jian-Pu Qin ◽  
Thor Friis ◽  
Wei-Jun Kong ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S117
Author(s):  
Cengiz Bahadir ◽  
Burcu Önal ◽  
Feride Ocak ◽  
Vildan Yaman ◽  
Semra Bozkurt

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Faldini ◽  
Danilo Leonetti ◽  
Matteo Nanni ◽  
Alberto Di Martino ◽  
Luca Denaro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
AYŞEGÜL CEYLAN ◽  
İBRAHİM AŞIK

Backgraund and aim: We aimed to compare the effectivity of PDCT (Percutaneous Disc Coagulation Therapy) and L-DISQ (navigable ablation decompression treatment) in patients who were diagnosed with cervical disc herniation. Methods: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Pain Index (NPI) were recorded initially and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months after the procedures. Patient Satisfaction Scale (PSS) were recorded 12th months after the procedures. Results: Mean VAS scores were 7.55 and 3.1 points in PDCT group and 7.6 and 3.00 points in L-DISQ group mean NPI scores were 34.2 and 20.75 points in PDCT group and 34.1 and 20.4 points in L-DISQ group initially and at the 12th month. When compared between months, there was a significant decrease in time-dependent VAS and NPI scores in both PDCT and L-DISQ groups (p=0.001). Some complications include esophageal, vascular and neural injuries, hoarseness, Horner syndrome, infections, dural puncture and muscle spasm. The only difference between groups was the rate of cervical spasm within one month after the procedure; 75% in PDCT group and 15% in L-DISQ group. Conclusion: The diameter of the canal of cervical vertebrae is narrower than of the lumbar and thoracic regions, therefore the smaller part of disc may be sufficient to create clinical signs. The respond to decompression therapies are faster in case cervical percutaneous procedures are performed correctly. Proper patient selection and practitioner’s experience are important in treatment success. Key Words: Navigable ablation, intradiscal decompression, PDCT, cervical herniation


2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Payer ◽  
Daniel May ◽  
Alain Reverdin ◽  
Enrico Tessitore

Object. The authors sought to evaluate retrospectively the radiological and clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy followed by implantation of an empty carbon fiber composite frame cage (CFCF) in the treatment of patients with cervical disc herniation and monoradiculopathy. Methods. Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 men, 13 women, mean age 45 years) with monoradiculopathy due to cervical disc herniation were treated by anterior cervical discectomy followed by implantation of an empty CFCF cage. On lateral flexion—extension radiographs segmental stability at a mean follow up of 14 months (range 5–31 months) was demonstrated in all 25 patients, and bone fusion was documented in 24 of 25 patients. The mean anterior intervertebral body height was 3.4 mm preoperatively and 3.8 mm at follow up in 20 patients. In these patients the mean segmental angle (angle between lower endplate of lower and upper vertebra) was 0.9° preoperatively and 3.1° at follow up. In the remaining five patients preoperative images were not retrievable. Self-scored neck pain based on a visual analog scale (1, minimum; 10, maximum) changed from a preoperative average of 5.6 to an average of 2 at follow up; radicular pain was reduced from 7.7 to 2.1 postoperatively. Analysis of the SF12 questionnaires showed a significant improvement in both the physical capacity score (preoperative mean 32.4 points; follow up 46 points) and the mental capacity score (preoperative mean 45.8 points; follow up 57.5 points). Conclusions. Implantation of an empty CFCF cage in the treatment of cervical disc herniation and monoradiculopathy avoids donor site morbidity associated with autologous bone grafting as well as the use of any supplementary material inside the cage. Restoration or maintenance of intervertebral height and thus segmental lordosis and a very high rate of segmental stability and fusion are achieved using this technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document