scholarly journals Comparison of Electroacupuncture and Moxibustion for Relieving Visceral Hypersensitivity in Rats with Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Meng Zhao ◽  
Liu Chen ◽  
Ci-Li Zhou ◽  
Yin Shi ◽  
Yu-Wei Li ◽  
...  

Aim. To compare whether there is different effect between electroacupuncture (EA) and moxibustion (Mox) on visceral hypersensitivity (their analgesic effects) in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (C-IBS).Methods. EA at 1 mA and 3 mA and Mox at 43°C and 46°C were applied to the Shangjuxu (ST37, bilateral) acupoint in rats with C-IBS and normal rats. An abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) score was used to assess visceral hypersensitivity. Toluidine blue staining was used to assess mast cell (MC) activity in colon of rats. Immunochemistry was used to measure 5-HT and 5-HT4 receptor expression in the colon.Results. AWR scores in all EA (1 mA and 3 mA) and Mox (43°C and 46°C) treatment groups after colorectal distention (CRD) stimulation pressure of 20, 40, 60, and 80 mmHg were significantly lower than those of the model (MC) group (Pall < 0.01). The MC counts and degranulation rates in the colon of all EA and Mox treatment groups and the MC group were significantly higher than those of the NC group (Pall < 0.01). MC degranulation rates in the colon of all EA and Mox treatment groups were lower than those of the MC group (Pall < 0.05). 5-HT expression in colon of all EA and Mox treatment groups was significantly lower than that of the MC group (Pall < 0.01), and 5-HT4R expression in colon of both EA groups was significantly higher than that of the MC group (Pboth < 0.01).Conclusion. EA and Mox treatments may both ameliorate visceral hypersensitivity at different degree in rats with C-IBS, and EA treatment was better than Mox.

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (01) ◽  
pp. 77-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Fang Song ◽  
Li-Xia Pei ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
Hao Geng ◽  
Meng-Qian Yuan ◽  
...  

Post inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS), a subset of IBS, is characterized by symptoms of visceral pain, bloating, and changed bowel habits that occur post initial episode of intestinal infection. Gut microbial dysbiosis or inflammation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of abdominal hypersensitivity of PI-IBS. Electroacupuncture (EA) stimulation results in an alleviated PI-IBS-associated symptom. This study investigated the effect of EA on IL-18 and gut microbial dysbiosis in one visceral hypersensitive rat models with PI-IBS. A trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced visceral hypersensitivity rat model was developed. EA stimulation was applied to the ST25 and ST36 acupoints. Animals were assessed using abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) scores to determine the development of colonic visceral hypersensitivity. The 16S rRNA was used to correlate microbial diversity. IL-18 expression in colon was quantified by quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting. We identified that model rats had an increased visceral hypersensitivity to colorectal distention at different distention pressures compared with the normal group. Sensitivity to colorectal distention decreased after EA stimulation. The composition of the fecal microbiota was different between groups. Specifically, in the model group Empedobacter, Psychrobacter, Enterococcus, Butyricimonas, Vampirovibrio, Kurthia, Intestinimonas, Neisseria, Falsiporphyromonas, Bilophila, Fusobacterium, Alistipes, Veillonella, Flavonifractor, Clostridium XlVa were more abundant affected genera, whereas Lactobacillus was enriched in normal rats. EA stimulation was correlated with significant decrease in the phyla of Fusobacteria. The mRNA and protein levels of IL-18 were higher in the model group. Meanwhile, EA stimulation attenuated this response. In a word, our findings suggest that PI-IBS is associated with significant increase in IL-18 levels as well as an alteration in microbiome diversity. These changes can be reversed with EA treatment. EA stimulation has a positive effect in alleviating symptoms of visceral hypersensitivity and protecting the gastrointestinal tract.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
І. М. Skrypnyk ◽  
I. H. Kryvoruchko ◽  
O. F. Gopko ◽  
N. P. Prykhodko

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhu DONG ◽  
Duo Wu ZOU ◽  
Zhao Shen LI ◽  
Xiao Ping ZOU ◽  
Ai Yong ZHU ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1127-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Keszthelyi ◽  
F. J. Troost ◽  
D. M. Jonkers ◽  
H. M. van Eijk ◽  
J. Dekker ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 448-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Qing Qi ◽  
Fei Xue Chen ◽  
Dong Yan Zhao ◽  
Li Xiang Li ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document