scholarly journals Ciliated Hepatic Foregut Cyst: A Report of a Case Incidentally Discovered during Transplant Evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Thomas Enke ◽  
Wuttiporn Manatsathit ◽  
Shaheed Merani ◽  
Kurt Fisher

Ciliated hepatic foregut cyst (CHFC) is a rare benign cyst of the liver derived from an embryonic remnant of foregut epithelium. CHFC is typically asymptomatic and is found incidentally. Recent reports of malignant transformation may warrant surgical removal of CHFC. We present the case of a 54-year-old male who was discovered to have a CHFC while undergoing kidney transplant evaluation.

1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1115-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan J. Vick ◽  
Zachary D. Goodman ◽  
Kamal G. Ishak

Abstract Ciliated hepatic foregut cysts are rare congenital lesions derived from the embryologic foregut. They are considered benign, and a review of 64 published cases revealed no instances of malignant transformation. We report a case of squamous cell carcinoma arising in a ciliated hepatic foregut cyst in a 51-year-old man. The tumor was found during a routine cholecystectomy and involved the adjacent mesentery and duodenal wall. There was histologic evidence of perineural and perivascular involvement. Despite an en bloc resection of the tumor and contiguous areas of gross involvement, the patient died 2 months later. Although aspiration of cyst contents is an accepted treatment for asymptomatic lesions, this case suggests that most ciliated hepatic foregut cysts should be excised, especially when radiologic studies yield equivocal results.


2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyu Chan Oh ◽  
Won Kyu Park ◽  
Jay Chun Jang ◽  
Joon Hyuk Choi ◽  
Dong Shik Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samira Farouk ◽  
Sarah Atallah ◽  
Kirk N Campbell ◽  
Joseph A Vassalotti ◽  
Jaime Uribarri

Abstract Background: Kidney transplantation remains the optimal therapy for patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), though a small fraction of patients on dialysis are on organ waitlists. An important barrier to preemptive kidney transplantation and successful waitlisting is timely referral to a kidney transplant center. We implemented a quality improvement strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals in a single center academic outpatient nephrology clinic. Methods: Over a 3 month period (July 1 - September 30, 2016), we assessed the baseline kidney transplantation referral rate at our outpatient nephrology clinic for patients 18 - 75 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 20 mL/min/1.73m 2 (2 values over 90 days apart). Charts were manually reviewed by two reviewers to look for kidney transplant referrals and documentation of discussions about kidney transplantation. We then performed a root cause analysis to explore potential barriers to kidney transplantation. Our intervention began on July 1, 2017 and included the implementation of a column in the electronic medical record (EMR) which displayed the patient's last eGFR as part of the clinic schedule. Physicians were given a document listing their patients to be seen that day with an eGFR of < 20 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Results: 54 unique patients with eGFR ≤ 20 ml/min/1.73 m 2 were identified who were seen in the Clinic between July 1, 2016 and September 30, 2016. 29.6% (16) eligible patients were referred for kidney transplantation evaluation. 69.5% (37) of these patients were not referred for kidney transplant evaluation. 46.3% (25) did not have documentation regarding kidney transplant in the EMR. Following the intervention, 66 unique patients met criteria for eligibility for kidney transplant evaluation. Kidney transplant referrals increased to 60.6% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our pilot implementation study of a strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals showed that a free, simple, scalable intervention can significantly improve kidney transplant referrals in the outpatient setting Next steps include further study of the impact of early referral to kidney transplant centers on preemptive and living donor kidney transplantation as well as successful waitlisting.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Patzer ◽  
Jennie P. Perryman ◽  
Stephen Pastan ◽  
Sandra Amaral ◽  
Julie A. Gazmararian ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e024671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mira Keddis ◽  
Dawn Finnie ◽  
Wonsun (Sunny) Kim

ObjectiveNative Americans suffer from lower rates of kidney transplantation compared with whites. Our goal was to elicit patients’ perceptions of and attitudes about kidney transplant and the impact of financial burden and cultural taboos.DesignThis is an exploratory qualitative interview study of 12 Native American patients recruited after completion of the kidney transplant evaluation.SettingSemistructured interviews were conducted. Interviews were coded using inductive methods, followed by interpretive coding by the investigators.ResultsThematic analysis revealed the following themes: (1) experience with kidney transplant education by the healthcare team; (2) cultural beliefs regarding kidney transplant; (3) personal motivation and attitude towards kidney transplant; (4) financial burden of kidney transplant and post-transplant care and (5) attitude about living donation.Most participants were educated about transplant as a treatment option after dialysis initiation. All patients in this study recognised that some taboos exist about the process of organ procurement and transplantation; however, the traditional views did not negatively impact their decision to pursue kidney transplant evaluation. Patients shared the common theme of preferring an organ from a living rather than a deceased person; however, the majority did not have a living donor and preferred not to receive an organ from a family member. Most patients did not perceive transplant-related cost as negatively impacting their attitude about receiving a transplant even for patients with below poverty level income.ConclusionsNative American patients presenting for kidney transplant were less likely to be educated about transplant before dialysis initiation; did not perceive financial burden and cultural beliefs were not discussed as obstacles to transplant. While a living donor was the preferred option, enthusiasm for living donation from family members was limited.


2015 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 1463-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh Anne Dageforde ◽  
Amanda Box ◽  
Irene D. Feurer ◽  
Kerri L. Cavanaugh

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1180-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Stringer ◽  
Matthew O. Jones ◽  
Helen Woodley ◽  
Judy Wyatt

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 840
Author(s):  
G. Vitiello ◽  
M. Wardenburg ◽  
S. Perez ◽  
K. Ogan ◽  
N. Turgeon

Hepatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 386-388
Author(s):  
Ioannis A. Ziogas ◽  
Dirk J. Windt ◽  
Gregory C. Wilson ◽  
Alessandro Furlan ◽  
Michael A. Nalesnik ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 2818-2821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharad Sharma ◽  
Ayumi Corn ◽  
Vivek Kohli ◽  
Harlan I. Wright ◽  
Anthony Sebastian ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document