scholarly journals Innovative Method of Traction in a Bilateral Diaphyseal Femur Fracture in a Polytrauma Below-Knee Amputee

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stefan Mitrasinovic ◽  
Georgios Kiziridis ◽  
Shauni Wellekens ◽  
Charline Roslee ◽  
Syed Neshat Anjum

While diaphyseal femoral shaft fractures are common, it is uncommon to see this injury in leg amputees. Traditionally, these fractures are internally fixed using a fracture table with reduction obtained by traction and adequate rotation exerted on a slightly abducted extremity. Special considerations need to be given in the management of patients with leg amputations. We report the case of a 24-year-old gentleman with bilateral diaphyseal femoral shaft fractures and a previous right below-knee amputation, who was transferred to our centre following a road traffic collision. We highlight important planning that needs to be undertaken for appropriate positioning, ease of reduction, and fracture fixation. We have reviewed the literature to highlight the methods that have been previously described and our use of skeletal traction through the amputation stump that can be utilised by other surgeons in challenging situations like this.

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Jae Kim ◽  
Yong Gab Jeong ◽  
Kwang Hwan Jung ◽  
Soo Sung Park ◽  
Eu Gene Kim

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Axelrod ◽  
Herman Johal ◽  
Kim Madden ◽  
Francesc Marcano ◽  
Carlos Prada

Background: Femoral Shaft fractures are devastating and life threatening injuries. Femoral shaft fractures are most commonly treated with intramedullary fixation. Malrotation of the injured limb after fixation is a common and significant complication following femoral shaft fractures. During the operation, patients can be positioned either supine or in a lateral position. Additionally, patients can be placed on a standard radiolucent operating room table, or placed on a fracture table with traction statically applied to the operative limb throughout the case. Previous case series and cohort studies have shown equivalence between study groups, but choice between positioning options remains controversial. Methods: This represents a protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. We will be compared lateral positioning with use of manual traction to supine positioning with use of a fracture table. Primary outcomes will be in assessment for feasibility for a future full scale randomized trial, including evaluating patient recruitment, patient compliance with followup, contamination between treatment arms and others. Results: The primary outcome will be feasibility for a future trial. Secondary outcomes will include malrotation as measured through postoperative computed tomography scans and gait analysis at 6 months.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Jay Agarwal-Harding ◽  
Louise Atadja ◽  
Linda Chokotho ◽  
Leonard Ngoie Banza ◽  
Nyengo Mkandawire ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is a growing burden of musculoskeletal trauma in Malawi, and a lack of surgical capacity to manage common, debilitating injuries like femoral shaft fractures (FSFs). Non-operative treatment with skeletal traction remains the standard of care, with surgery available only at central hospitals. Patients experience myriad barriers to care, which can result in delayed treatment and complications. We sought to understand how patients navigate the Malawian health system and the barriers they face while seeking care. Methods: We performed in-depth, semi-structured interviews of 15 adults with closed FSFs during their inpatient hospitalization at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), a public referral hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. We additionally interviewed one patient who left KCH to seek care at a private hospital. An English-speaking study investigator performed all interviews accompanied by a Chichewa-speaking medical interpreter. Interviews focused on patients’ pathways from injury to present treatment (health system navigation); impressions of the hospital and care received; and the effects of injury/treatment on patients and their families. Interviews were audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed in English. We coded the transcripts and performed a thematic analysis. Results: We identified 6 themes: high variability in health system navigation; frustrations with the biopsychosocial effects of hospitalization; lack of participation in decision-making and uncertainty about treatment course; preference for surgery (vs. traction) based on patients’ own experiences and observations; frustrations with the inequitable provision of surgery ; and patients’ resignation, acceptance, and resilience in the face of hardship. Many patients receiving non-operative treatment described the devastating financial burden imposed upon them and their families by their injury and prolonged hospitalization. They felt they were receiving inferior treatment compared to surgery and suspected that richer patients were receiving more timely care. Conclusion: This qualitative study suggests a need to standardize care for FSF in Malawi, increase availability and timeliness of surgery, and increase transparency and communication between providers and patients. These remedies should focus on improving quality of care and achieving equity in access to care.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Axelrod ◽  
Herman Johal ◽  
Kim Madden ◽  
Francesc Marcano ◽  
Carlos Prada

Background: Femoral Shaft fractures are devastating and life threatening injuries. Femoral shaft fractures are most commonly treated with intramedullary fixation. Malrotation of the injured limb after fixation is a common and significant complication following femoral shaft fractures. During the operation, patients can be positioned either supine or in a lateral position. Additionally, patients can be placed on a standard radiolucent operating room table, or placed on a fracture table with traction statically applied to the operative limb throughout the case. Previous case series and cohort studies have shown equivalence between study groups, but choice between positioning options remains controversial. Methods: This represents a protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. We will be compared lateral positioning with use of manual traction to supine positioning with use of a fracture table. Primary outcomes will be in assessment for feasibility for a future full scale randomized trial, including evaluating patient recruitment, patient compliance with followup, contamination between treatment arms and others. Results: The primary outcome will be feasibility for a future trial. Secondary outcomes will include malrotation as measured through postoperative computed tomography scans and gait analysis at 6 months.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document