scholarly journals The experiences of adult patients receiving treatment for femoral shaft fractures at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Malawi: a qualitative analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Jay Agarwal-Harding ◽  
Louise Atadja ◽  
Linda Chokotho ◽  
Leonard Ngoie Banza ◽  
Nyengo Mkandawire ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is a growing burden of musculoskeletal trauma in Malawi, and a lack of surgical capacity to manage common, debilitating injuries like femoral shaft fractures (FSFs). Non-operative treatment with skeletal traction remains the standard of care, with surgery available only at central hospitals. Patients experience myriad barriers to care, which can result in delayed treatment and complications. We sought to understand how patients navigate the Malawian health system and the barriers they face while seeking care. Methods: We performed in-depth, semi-structured interviews of 15 adults with closed FSFs during their inpatient hospitalization at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), a public referral hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. We additionally interviewed one patient who left KCH to seek care at a private hospital. An English-speaking study investigator performed all interviews accompanied by a Chichewa-speaking medical interpreter. Interviews focused on patients’ pathways from injury to present treatment (health system navigation); impressions of the hospital and care received; and the effects of injury/treatment on patients and their families. Interviews were audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed in English. We coded the transcripts and performed a thematic analysis. Results: We identified 6 themes: high variability in health system navigation; frustrations with the biopsychosocial effects of hospitalization; lack of participation in decision-making and uncertainty about treatment course; preference for surgery (vs. traction) based on patients’ own experiences and observations; frustrations with the inequitable provision of surgery ; and patients’ resignation, acceptance, and resilience in the face of hardship. Many patients receiving non-operative treatment described the devastating financial burden imposed upon them and their families by their injury and prolonged hospitalization. They felt they were receiving inferior treatment compared to surgery and suspected that richer patients were receiving more timely care. Conclusion: This qualitative study suggests a need to standardize care for FSF in Malawi, increase availability and timeliness of surgery, and increase transparency and communication between providers and patients. These remedies should focus on improving quality of care and achieving equity in access to care.

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Jain ◽  
A Aggarwal ◽  
D Gulati ◽  
MP Singh

The management of femoral shaft fractures in children is largely directed by the age and built of the child. There is wide consensus on the non operative treatment of children less than six years of age. Operative treatment is recommended for children more than 12 years of age, only the surgical options vary. The age group of 6-12 years remains a controversial area with multiple studies advocating different lines of treatment.We studied the literature on treatment of femoral shaft fractures in 6 to 12 year age group over the past 25 years through PubMed search and found 79 studies dealing with management of paediatric shaft femur fractures in this age group. Studies dealing with other age groups, animal studies and languages other than English were excluded. The treatment modalities included early or immediate hip spica, traction alone, external fixator, plating (open/minimally invasive), intramedullary nailing- rigid/flexible and intramedullary Kirschner wire. The short listed articles were studied for rate and time of union, complications such as non-union and malunion, leg length discrepancy, infection, implant impingement, refracture and cost analysis.Operative treatment is usually the preferred treatment option in this age group, as it decreases hospitalization time, decreases morbidity and allows early return of child to school. Flexible intramedullary nailing is recommended for length stable fractures. Submuscular bridge plating (minimally invasive) is reserved for comminuted fractures. External fixator is reserved for open fractures and initial stabilization of femoral shaft fractures in polytrauma pediatric patients. Intramedullary K wire is a viable option in resource contrained centres where specialized implants and instrumentation is not available.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.12(1) 2014: 77-84


1992 ◽  
Vol &NA; (283) ◽  
pp. 270???275
Author(s):  
PETR HAVR??ANEK ◽  
JOHAN NATHORST WESTFELT ◽  
BJ??URN HENRIKSON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document