Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Nonvitrectomized and Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Two-Year Retrospective Analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. The medical records of 28 eyes (11 vitrectomized and 17 nonvitrectomized) of 28 patients (mean age, 59.0 ± 9.6 years; male to female ratio 1 : 1) who were diagnosed with DME and had received IVR treatment were reviewed retrospectively. The indications of vitrectomy in 11 vitrectomized eyes were intravitreal hemorrhage (n = 8) and epiretinal membrane (n = 3). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and total macular volume (TMV) were measured at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of the follow-up. The number of IVR injections, the duration between diagnosis of DME and IVR injection, and the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at baseline were also recorded. Baseline demographics, HbA1c, BCVA, CMT, and TMV values were similar between two groups (p>0.05). The duration between diagnosis of DME and IVR injections was similar in both groups (16 ± 5 months vs. 13 ± 4 months, respectively; p=0.11). IVR injection was performed 6.3 times in vitrectomized eyes and 6.1 times in nonvitrectomized eyes during the 24-month period (p>0.05). The mean BCVA improved significantly during the 24-month period in both groups. The improvements in BCVA, in CMT, and in TMV were more significant at month 6 (p=0.036) group, at month 12 (p=0.013), at month 12 (p=0.021), and month 24 (p=0.021) in nonvitrectomized eyes, respectively, while there was no difference in improvements of BCVA, CMT, and TMV in vitrectomized group at each visit. Treatment effected by time in terms of BCVA, CMT, and TMV values in all groups (p=0.0004, p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively), not by time-group interaction and group (all p values >0.05). In conclusion, IVR treatment for DME is equally effective in both groups. However, the response to treatment is seen earlier in nonvitrectomized eyes compared to vitrectomized eyes.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Nonvitrectomized and Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Two-Year Retrospective Analysis

10.21203/rs.2.9466/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Ozgun Melike Gedar Totuk ◽

Ayse Yagmur Kanra ◽

Mohammed Nadim Bromand ◽

Guler Kilic ◽

Sevil Ari Yaylali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Medical Records ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Female Ratio ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

Baseline Values ◽

Male To Female

Abstract Background: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. Methods: The medical records of 30 eyes (13 vitrectomized, 17 nonvitrectomized) of 28 patients (mean age, 59.09.6 years; male to female ratio 1:1) who were diagnosed with DME and had received IVR treatment were reviewed retrospectively. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and total macular volume (TMV) were measured at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of the follow-up. The number of IVR injections, the duration between diagnosis of DME and IVR injection, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at baseline were also recorded. Results: Baseline demographics, HbA1c, BCVA, CMT, and TMV values were similar between the vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized groups (p>0.05). The duration between diagnosis of DME and IVR injections was longer in the nonvitrectomized group than in the vitrectomized group (165 years vs. 134 years, respectively; p=0.045). IVR injection was performed 6.3 times in vitrectomized eyes and 6.1 times in nonvitrectomized eyes during the 24-month period (p>0.05). BCVA improved significantly during the 24-month period in both groups. The improvement in BCVA was significant at month 6 in nonvitrectomized eyes, while there was no significant improvement in vitrectomized eyes before month 18. Compared to the baseline values, the decrease in both CMT and TMV was significant in months 6, 12, 18, and 24 in the nonvitrectomized group (p<0.05). In the vitrectomized group both CMT and TMV improved significantly only in months 18 and 24 (p<0.05). Conclusion: IVR treatment for DME is equally effective in both vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. However, the response to treatment is seen later in vitrectomized eyes compared to nonvitrectomized eyes.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Nonvitrectomized and Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Two-Year Retrospective Analysis

10.21203/rs.2.9466/v2 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Ozgun Melike Gedar Totuk ◽

Ayse Yagmur Kanra ◽

Mohammed Nadim Bromand ◽

Guler Kilic ◽

Sevil Ari Yaylali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Female Ratio ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

Baseline Values ◽

The Mean ◽

Male To Female

Abstract Background: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. Methods: The medical records of 30 eyes (13 vitrectomized, 17 nonvitrectomized) of 28 patients (mean age, 59.0±9.6 years; male to female ratio 1:1) who were diagnosed with DME and had received IVR treatment were reviewed retrospectively. The indications of vitrectomy in 13 vitrectomized eyes were intravitreal hemorrhage (n=8), vitreomacular traction (n=1), and epiretinal membrane (n=4). The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and total macular volume (TMV) were measured at baseline and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of the follow-up. The number of IVR injections, the duration between diagnosis of DME and IVR injection, and hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) level at baseline were also recorded. Retreatment criteria included persistence of submacular fluid, intraretinal cysts, or CMT of more than 300 μm. Results: Baseline demographics, HbA1c, BCVA, CMT, and TMV values were similar between the vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized groups (p>0.05). The duration between diagnosis of DME and IVR injections was longer in the nonvitrectomized group than in the vitrectomized group (16±5 months vs. 13±4 months, respectively; p=0.045). IVR injection was performed 6.3 times in vitrectomized eyes and 6.1 times in nonvitrectomized eyes during the 24-month period (p>0.05). The mean BCVA improved significantly during the 24-month period in both groups (for vitrectomized group from 0.51±0.26 logMAR to 0.40±0.22 logMAR; for nonvitrectomized group from 0.72±0.28 logMAR to 0.50±0.22 logMAR). The improvement in BCVA was significant at month 6 in nonvitrectomized eyes, while there was no significant improvement in vitrectomized eyes before month 18. Compared to the baseline values, the decrease in both CMT and TMV was significant in months 6, 12, 18, and 24 in the nonvitrectomized group (p<0.05). In the vitrectomized group both CMT and TMV improved significantly only in months 18 and 24 (p<0.05). Conclusion: IVR treatment for DME is equally effective in both vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. However, the response to treatment is seen later in vitrectomized eyes compared to nonvitrectomized eyes.

Download Full-text

Effect of Calcium Dobesilate (CaD) on Diabetic Macular Edema Treated by Intravitreal Ranibizumab

10.21203/rs.3.rs-830956/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Dongxuan Wang ◽

Hui Wang ◽

Shuang Wu ◽

Xueqiu Yang ◽

Jiansen Xu

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Calcium Dobesilate ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

The Mean ◽

Pro Re Nata ◽

Dose Injection ◽

Control Study

Abstract Background: Calcium dobesilate (CaD) had been used in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR) due to its potential in protecting against retinal vascular damage. However, it did not reduce the risk of development of diabetic macular edema (DME). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CaD plus intravitreal ranibizumab in the treatment of DME.Methods: This retrospective, observational, consecutive case control study enrolled patients newly diagnosed with DME who received intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) administration with 3-monthly loading dose injection followed by pro re nata (3+PRN) regimen with or without CaD orally daily for at least 12-month follow-up. Medical records and optical coherence tomography (OCT) results were reviewed and compared at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after injection.Results: A total of 102 eyes from 102 patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-four patients received IVR combined with CaD orally (IVR+CaD group), while forty-eight patients received IVR solely (IVR group). No statistically significant differences were found in the general condition of patients between the two groups at baseline (P > 0.05). At every follow-up, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved and the central macular thickness (CMT) decreased in both groups when compared with those at baseline (P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences in BCVA improvement and CMT reduction between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean number of ranibizumab injections in R+C group was significantly lower than that in R group (5.4 ± 1.1 injections versus 6.7 ± 1.6 injections, P<0.05) within 1-year treatment. No adverse events were found in neither groups.Conclusions: Adding oral CaD to intravitreal ranibizumab was demonstrated to have similar effectiveness and safety for improving visual function and restoring the anatomy of the retina in macular with fewer injections in DME patients.

Download Full-text

Comparisons of Efficacy of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2017/1747108 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2017 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Norihiro Shimizu ◽

Toshiyuki Oshitari ◽

Tomoaki Tatsumi ◽

Yoko Takatsuna ◽

Miyuki Arai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Medical Records ◽

Serous Retinal Detachment ◽

Central Macular Thickness ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽

The Mean ◽

Better Than

We compared the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) to intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). The medical records of 49 eyes of 36 patients who were diagnosed with DME and had received IVR and 46 eyes of 40 patients who had received IVA treatment were reviewed. The central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured at the baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the IVR or IVA. The mean number of injections of IVR was 2.6±1.1 and of IVA was 2.7±1.4. At 6 months, the CMT was significantly thinner than the baseline after IVR and after IVA. The mean BCVA was significantly better than the baseline after IVR only at 1 and 3 months and after IVA at 1 and 6 months. The BCVA of eyes with serous retinal detachment (SRD) was significantly better at 1 month after the IVR and at 1 month and 6 months after the IVA. The BCVAs improved more significantly in the SRD+ group than in the SRD− group. The effects of IVA persist longer than that of IVR. The effectiveness of both IVR and IVA was not dependent on the presence of SRD (IRB#2107).

Download Full-text

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema in Vitrectomized and Nonvitrectomized Eyes

Ophthalmologica ◽

10.1159/000446992 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 236 (2) ◽

pp. 67-73 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Yoshito Koyanagi ◽

Shigeo Yoshida ◽

Yoshiyuki Kobayashi ◽

Yuki Kubo ◽

Muneo Yamaguchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Visual Acuity ◽

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Treatment Option ◽

Central Macular Thickness ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

The Mean ◽

The Difference ◽

Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME) between eyes with and without previous vitrectomy. Procedures: We prospectively assessed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) after IVR for 6 months. Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline BCVA and CMT between both groups. In the nonvitrectomized group (n = 15), the mean changes of BCVA and CMT from baseline to month 6 were significant (p < 0.01). In the vitrectomized group (n = 10), the improvement appeared to be slower, and the mean BCVA improvement was not significant (p = 0.5), although the mean CMT decrease was significant (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of BCVA and CMT between both groups at 6 months. Conclusions: The difference in the effectiveness of IVR between both groups was not significant. IVR can be a treatment option even for vitrectomized DME eyes.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab following Initial Treatment with Ranibizumab in Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1155/2018/4171628 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2018 ◽

pp. 1-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Ali Demircan ◽

Zeynep Alkin ◽

Ceren Yesilkaya ◽

Gokhan Demir ◽

Burcu Kemer

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Medical Records ◽

Poor Response ◽

Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽

The Mean ◽

Retrospective Comparative Study ◽

Switch Group ◽

Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose. To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) who switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept with those who continued with previous ranibizumab therapy. Methods. In this retrospective comparative study, medical records of consecutive patients with center-involved DME ≥ 350 μm who had at least three recent consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections followed by as-needed therapy with either aflibercept or ranibizumab were reviewed. Data were collected at presentation (preinjection), at the intermediary visit, and at the last visit (at the end of the follow-up period). Results. Forty-three eyes of 43 patients were divided into two groups: the switch group (n=20) and the ranibizumab group (n=23). Though no significant improvement was found in the mean BCVA from the intermediary visit to the last visit, there was a difference in the mean CMT in the switch group and the ranibizumab group (p<0.001 and p=0.03, resp.). The mean CMT decreased after the intermediary visit by 188.6 ± 120.5 μm in the switch group and by 60.3 ± 117.1 μm in the ranibizumab group (p=0.003). Conclusions. Both aflibercept and ranibizumab decreased CMT in patients with persistent DME who showed a poor response to ranibizumab injections. However, switching to aflibercept provided only morphologic improvement.

Download Full-text

Comparison of aflibercept and ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema associated with subretinal detachment

European Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1177/1120672119827855 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 30 (2) ◽

pp. 363-369 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Abdullah Ozkaya ◽

Gokhan Demir ◽

Asli Kirmaci

Keyword(s):

Visual Acuity ◽

Retinal Detachment ◽

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽

Best Corrected Visual Acuity

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Methods: This is a retrospective, comparative study. The treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients who had diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment and underwent intravitreal aflibercept or intravitreal ranibizumab treatment were included. The patients were treated on a pro re nata treatment regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and the follow-up time was 12 months. The primary outcome measure of this study was the presence of subfoveal retinal detachment after treatment at different time points. The secondary outcome measures were the change in best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Results: A total of 46 eyes of 46 patients were included. The aflibercept group consisted of 20 and the ranibizumab group consisted of 26 eyes. During the follow-up period of 12 months, subfoveal retinal detachment was completely resolved in 75% versus 57.7% of the eyes at month 3 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 76.9% at month 6 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 65.4% at month 9 (p = 0.05), and 100% versus 80.8% at month 12 (p = 0.03) in the intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab groups. The change in best corrected visual acuity was not statistically different between the groups at months 3, 6, 9, and 12, respectively (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Both intravitreal aflibercept and intravitreal ranibizumab were effective in regards to anatomical and functional outcomes of diabetic macular edema patients associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Interestingly, intravitreal aflibercept seemed more effective than intravitreal ranibizumab in the resolution of subfoveal retinal detachment at month 12.

Download Full-text

Success of Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization After 2 Years of Treatment

Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases ◽

10.1177/2474126416687681 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 122-125 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Beatriz Abadia ◽

Pilar Calvo ◽

Antonio Ferreras ◽

Gloria Lopez ◽

Jesús Leciñena ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Choroidal Neovascularization ◽

Medical Records ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Retinal Thickness ◽

Pathological Myopia ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

The Mean ◽

Pro Re Nata

Purpose: To analyze the anatomical and functional outcomes in patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathological myopia (PM). Methods: Retrospective review of the medical records of 40 patients with CNV secondary to PM treated exclusively with intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and at least 24 months of follow-up. The initial dose comprised 1 or 3 monthly injections followed by a pro re nata regimen. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ocular and systemic adverse event were recorded. Results: Mean patient age was 62.5 ± 12.5 years. The mean spherical equivalent refractive error was −12.3 ± 6.9 diopters, and a single intravitreal injection was initially performed in 72.5% of cases. Mean baseline BCVA was 0.33 ± 0.20 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/60), and mean CRT by OCT was 340.65 ± 80 µm. Both BCVA and OCT revealed significant improvement compared to baseline at all established cutoff points ( P < .001). Final BCVA was 0.50 ± 0.3 logMAR (Snellen, 20/40), and final CRT was 255.69 ± 47.7 µm ( P < .001). The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 2.75 ± 1.97. No cases of endophthalmitis or retinal detachments were reported, and no serious adverse systemic events were identified. Conclusion: Excellent anatomical and functional outcomes were obtained after treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab for CNV secondary to PM.

Download Full-text

Renal Biomarkers for Treatment Effect of Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal of Diabetes Research ◽

10.1155/2020/7239570 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Ivan Pochou Lai ◽

Wei-Lun Huang ◽

Chung-May Yang ◽

Chang-Hao Yang ◽

Tzyy-Chang Ho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽

Foveal Thickness ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

Visual Improvement ◽

Renal Biomarkers ◽

One Year ◽

Ranibizumab Treatment

Aims. To investigate the correlations between renal biomarkers and the treatment outcomes of ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. This hospital-based study retrospectively enrolled 88 eyes from 67 patients who had received one-year intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for DME. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and during the follow-up period were recorded. BCVA and OCT characteristics at baseline and their changes after ranibizumab treatment were compared between different proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups. Results. Of the 88 eyes studied, those with moderately increased proteinuria had a thicker central subfield foveal thickness (CFT) and a higher proportion of intraretinal cysts than those with no proteinuria (P=0.012 and 0.045, respectively) at baseline. After one year of ranibizumab treatment, the reduction in CFT was greater in patients with severely increased proteinuria than those with normal to mildly increased proteinuria (P=0.030). On the other hand, patients with an eGFR <30 tended to have poorer visual improvements than those with normal eGFR (P=0.044). Conclusions. After ranibizumab treatment for DME, patients with severe proteinuria tended to gain better anatomical improvement, while those with poor eGFR tended to have poorer visual improvement.

Download Full-text

Vitreomacular interface after anti-VEGF injections in diabetic macular edema

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous ◽

10.1186/s40942-021-00295-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Carlos E. Veloso ◽

Daniel N. Brocchi ◽

Rishi P. Singh ◽

Márcio B. Nehemy

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Retinal Thickness ◽

Short Term ◽

Vitreomacular Adhesion ◽

Corrected Visual Acuity ◽

Anti Vegf ◽

Vitreomacular Interface ◽

The Mean

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) release after anti-VEGF therapy for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate further changes in outcome. Methods This was a retrospective study that enrolled 66 eyes of 66 patients with DME who presented with VMA diagnosed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline. VMA was classified as focal (attachment: ≤ 1500 μm) or broad (attachment: > 1500 μm). All patients received at least three monthly intravitreal injections of an anti-VEGF agent. Follow-up visits were performed 1 month after each injection to evaluate the incidence of VMA release. Results The mean patient age was 61.4 years (range: 29 to 78 years), and 72.7 % were male. The mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.62 logMAR, and the mean central retinal thickness (CRT) was 473 μm at baseline. The mean length of follow-up was 18.5 months, and the mean number of injections was 5.8. The intravitreal drugs used were aflibercept (40.9 %), ranibizumab (37.9 %) and bevacizumab (21.2 %). Forty-seven eyes had broad VMA, and 19 had focal VMA. Twenty-two eyes (33.3 %) developed VMA release following a mean of 5.7 injections (range: 3–13). Sixteen eyes (72.7 %) with focal VMA and 6 eyes (27.3 %) with broad VMA at baseline developed VMA release. Twenty-one eyes that developed VMA release showed an improvement in CRT following VMA release (mean: -106 μm; range: 22 to 289 μm). Conclusions VMA release occurs in approximately 1/3 of patients with DME following anti-VEGF therapy. Most of them show a short-term decrease in CRT.

Download Full-text