scholarly journals Effects of Carotid Artery Stent and Carotid Endarterectomy on Cognitive Function in Patients with Carotid Stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Pan Huang ◽  
Xiao-ying He ◽  
Min Xu

Background. Carotid artery stenosis is closely related to cognitive dysfunction, in which decreased cerebral perfusion is one of the important factors. Both carotid artery stent implantation and carotid endarterectomy can relieve stenosis and increase cerebral perfusion. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of carotid artery stent implantation and endarterectomy on cognitive function. Methods. A total of 98 patients with carotid artery stenosis hospitalized in our hospital from July 2015 to January 2017 were included. Among them, 50 cases underwent carotid artery stent implantation treatment as stent implantation group (CAS group), and 48 cases underwent carotid artery endarterectomy treatment as carotid endarterectomy group (CEA group). Using the Mini-Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE Scale) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA Scale), the cognitive function scores of the two groups of patients before and after 3 and 6 months of operation were measured, and the patients were also measured before and after surgery, after the serum NSE, hs-CRP content. Results. The serum NSE, hs-CRP content, MMSE score, and MoCA score of the two groups before treatment were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05 ). The MMSE score and MoCA score of the two groups of patients before treatment were lower than the normal value, suggesting carotid artery stenosis combined with different degrees of cognitive dysfunction. Carotid artery stenosis is different, and patients’ cognitive function is also different. The MMSE score and MoCA score of the two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation were higher than before treatment, and there was a statistically significant difference between 6 and 3 months after operation ( P < 0.05 ), but at each time There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). The NSE content of the two groups of patients after operation decreased compared with that before treatment, and the decrease in 6 months after operation was more obvious than that in March ( P < 0.05 ). However, the difference between the two groups at each time point was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05 ). The content of hs-CRP in the two groups of patients was higher than that before the operation, and the CAS group was significantly higher than the CEA group; the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Carotid artery stent and carotid endarterectomy are effective in improving the cognitive function of patients with carotid stenosis, but there is no significant difference between the two.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhua Wan ◽  
Yiran Li ◽  
Jiasheng Xu ◽  
Shasha Wan ◽  
Riwei Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To explore the mid-and long-term clinical efficacy analysis of carotid artery stenosis treated with carotid endarterectomy.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 89 cases of patients with carotid artery stenosisundergoing carotid endarterectomy from our center from Jan,2013 to June,2017. To gather the hospitalization data of patients including the general information, the past medical history, preoperative conditions, the situation during surgery, postoperative situations. All the patients were followed up from 16 months to 63 months, and to make survival analysis on the follow-up status.Results:Among the 89 cases, 22cases of mild stenosis ,67cases of severe stenosis. 5 cases had postoperation wound hemorrhage or hematoma, 2 cases of cranial nerve injury, 2cases of cerebral stroke. Among the 62 cases of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis,48cases have been improved in term of their clinical symptoms with improvement rate of 77.4%. The Nonparametric test of mRS scores before and after surgery showed that there was significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative scores(P<0.05).Conclusion: The mid-and long-term clinical efficacy of carotid artery stenosis treated with carotid endarterectomy is good. The previous history of coronary heart disease and peripheral vascular diseases are the influence factors for the mid- and long-term adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Takaiwa ◽  
Naoya Kuwayama ◽  
Naoki Akioka ◽  
Kunikazu Kurosaki ◽  
Nakamasa Hayashi ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Turk ◽  
I. Chaudry ◽  
V.M. Haughton ◽  
B.P. Hermann ◽  
H.A. Rowley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
James Hu ◽  
◽  
Andy Sohn ◽  
Justin George ◽  
Rajesh Malik ◽  
...  

Carotid artery atherosclerotic disease impacts over 2 million Americans annually. Since the advent of the carotid endarterectomy by Debakey in 1953, the surgical management of carotid artery stenosis has prevented cerebrovascular accidents. The technology utilized to manage carotid artery stenosis continued to evolve with the utilization of carotid artery stenting in 1989 and more recently transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). This review discusses the modern management of carotid artery stenosis with an emphasis on transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and reversal of flow for reversal of flow for embolic protection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document