scholarly journals Central Extension of Left Alternative Algebras and the Second Cohomology Group

Author(s):  
Said Boulmane

The purpose of this paper is to prove that the second cohomology group H 2 A , F of a left alternative algebra A over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic 0 can be interpreted as the set of equivalent classes of one-dimensional central extensions of A .

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wende Liu ◽  
Yong Yang

Suppose the ground field [Formula: see text] is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. By means of spectral sequences, the computation of the first cohomology group of the model filiform Lie superalgebra [Formula: see text] with coefficients in the adjoint module is reduced to the computation of the first cohomology group of an Abel ideal and a one-dimensional subalgebra. Then, by calculating the outer derivations, the algebra structure of the first cohomology group of [Formula: see text] is completely characterized.


2002 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
ESTHER BENEISH

Let G be a finite group, and let F be an algebraically closed field. The rational extension of F, F(G) = F(xg : g ∈ G) with G action given by hxg = xhg for g, h ∈ G, is referred to as the Noether setting for G. We show that if G is a group with zero Schur multiplier, then for any central extension G′ of G, F(G′)G′ and F(G)G are stably equivalent over F. That is, F(G)G is stably rational over F if and only if F(G′)G′ is stably rational over F. In particular, if G is a cyclic group or an abelian group with zero Schur multiplier, then F(G′) is stably rational over F.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 2242-2268 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTEO RUGGIERO

We give a classification of superattracting germs in dimension $1$ over a complete normed algebraically closed field $\mathbb{K}$ of positive characteristic up to conjugacy. In particular, we show that formal and analytic classifications coincide for these germs. We also give a higher-dimensional version of some of these results.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (02) ◽  
pp. 309-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Xie ◽  
Yongzheng Zhang

Let 𝔽 be an algebraically closed field and char 𝔽 = p > 3. In this paper, we determine the second cohomology group of the finite-dimensional Contact superalgebra K(m,n,t).


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 639-654
Author(s):  
Hailou Yao ◽  
Guoqiang Han

Let A be a connected minimal representation-infinite algebra over an algebraically closed field k. In this paper, we investigate the simple connectedness and strong simple connectedness of A. We prove that A is simply connected if and only if its first Hochschild cohomology group H1(A) is trivial. We also give some equivalent conditions of strong simple connectedness of an algebra A.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-366
Author(s):  
Pavel Etingof ◽  
Shlomo Gelaki

Abstract We generalize the theory of the second invariant cohomology group $H^{2}_{\textrm{inv}}(G)$ for finite groups G, developed in [3, 4, 14], to the case of affine algebraic groups G, using the methods of [9, 10, 12]. In particular, we show that for connected affine algebraic groups G over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, the map Θ from [14] is bijective (unlike for some finite groups, as shown in [14]). This allows us to compute $H^{2}_{\textrm{inv}}(G)$ in this case, and in particular show that this group is commutative (while for finite groups it can be noncommutative, as shown in [14]).


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Finkelberg ◽  
Sergey Lysenko

AbstractLet k be an algebraically closed field and O = k[[t]] ⊂ F = k((t)). For an almost simple algebraic group G we classify central extensions 1 → $\mathbb{G}_m\to E\to G(\bm{F})\$m → E → G(F) → 1; any such extension splits canonically over G(O). Fix a positive integer N and a primitive character ζ : μN(K) →$\mathbb{Q}}_\ell^*}$ (under some assumption on the characteristic of k). Consider the category of G(O)-bi-invariant perverse sheaves on E with $\mathbb{G}_m$m-monodromy ζ. We show that this is a tensor category, which is tensor equivalent to the category of representations of a reductive group ǦE,N. We compute the root datum of ǦE,N.


1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1092-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Feit ◽  
Jacques Tits

Let G be a finite simple group and let F be an algebraically closed field. A faithful projective F-representation of G of smallest possible degree often cannot be lifted to an ordinary representation of G, though it can of course be lifted to an ordinary representation of some central extension of G. It is a natural question to ask whether by considering non-central extensions, it is possible in some cases to decrease the smallest degree of a faithful projective representation.


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar G. Goodaire ◽  
Roy C. Snell

Let C by a Cayley-Dickson algebra over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic 0. A multiplication table for a basis of this 8-dimensional alternative algebra can be found in [3], page 137, where we take α = β = γ = — 1.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 629-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Klep ◽  
Primož Moravec

We classify all finite-dimensional Lie algebras over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0, whose nonzero elements have abelian centralizers. These algebras are either simple or solvable, where the only simple such Lie algebra is [Formula: see text]. In the solvable case, they are either abelian or a one-dimensional split extension of an abelian Lie algebra.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document